{"id":9117,"date":"2017-06-26T10:55:22","date_gmt":"2017-06-26T16:55:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/?p=9117"},"modified":"2017-06-26T10:55:22","modified_gmt":"2017-06-26T16:55:22","slug":"renown-um-no","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/2017\/06\/26\/renown-um-no\/","title":{"rendered":"“Renown?” Um, No"},"content":{"rendered":"

Okay, kids, it’s time for another fun-filled episode of Copy Editor Pet Peeves<\/em> with your charmingly curmudgeonish host, me<\/em>.<\/p>\n

I was just reading an article on “bad movies that are fun to watch” (you know the type) and I saw this sentence referring to the iconic Patrick Swayze vehicle Road House<\/em>:<\/p>\n

“…let\u2019s act like America is a country where club bouncers are revered and renown<\/strong> like celebrities…” [emphasis mine]<\/p>\n

Um, no.<\/p>\n

No, no, no, no.<\/p>\n

NO.<\/p>\n

The word is not<\/em> “renown.” Not in this context, anyhow. I’ve been seeing this error a lot recently, almost as if it’s just suddenly and spontaneously become a thing, and it’s driving me nuts. For the record — and write this down, you will<\/em> be graded — it’s “renowned” with an “-ed” at the end. RenownED.<\/p>\n

“Renown” is a noun meaning “acclaim.” It’s something you possess or are given. If you are fortunate enough to have someone give you renown, then you are renowned, just as you are “acclaimed” when you receive acclaim. Simple, right? And yet people are blowing it all the time… even in a sentence where it’s preceded by the correct past participle “revered.” Didn’t it look strange to have one action-word ending in “-ed” but not the other?<\/p>\n

Sigh. “Renowned,” not “renown.”<\/p>\n