{"id":453,"date":"2006-01-19T17:49:37","date_gmt":"2006-01-19T17:49:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/?p=453"},"modified":"2006-01-19T17:49:37","modified_gmt":"2006-01-19T17:49:37","slug":"soderbergh_on_changing_paradig","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/2006\/01\/19\/soderbergh_on_changing_paradig\/","title":{"rendered":"Soderbergh on Changing Paradigms"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following up on something I mentioned in last night&#8217;s <a title=\"A Little Hollywood Rambling\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/2006\/01\/a_little_hollywood_rambling\/\">rambling entry<\/a> on the movie business, I&#8217;ve found an <a href=\"http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/bpwpo\">interview<\/a> that director Steven Soderbergh gave to <i>Wired<\/i> magazine about his plans to release his new film on DVD, HD-cable TV, and in theaters all at the same time. Relevant to my purposes:<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><b>WIRED: Why did you decide to release <i>Bubble<\/i> in all formats at once?<\/b><br \/>\nSODERBERGH: Name any big-title movie that&#8217;s come out in the last four years. It has been available in all formats on the day of release. It&#8217;s called piracy. Peter Jackson&#8217;s <i>Lord of the Rings<\/i>, <i>Ocean&#8217;s Eleven<\/i>, and <i>Ocean&#8217;s Twelve<\/i> &#8211; I saw them on Canal Street on opening day. Simultaneous release is already here. We&#8217;re just trying to gain control over it.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>So this is a way to combat piracy?<\/b><br \/>\nIt can be. Warner Bros. has talked about going out with low-cost DVDs simultaneously in China because piracy is so huge there. It will be a while before bigger movies go out in all formats; in five years, everything will.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Will people keep going to theaters?<\/b><br \/>\nAlways. You&#8217;re going to see attendance plateau a bit, but it&#8217;s still the number one date destination. That&#8217;s never going away.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I find this interesting because, first of all, Soderbergh agrees with me that theatrical exhibition is not going to vanish, and it&#8217;s always nice to have a pro back me up. But I&#8217;m also intrigued by his reasoning that a so-called &#8220;day and date&#8221; release strategy will help to curb piracy. Now, for the record, I think all this concern over piracy is just Hollywood working itself into a tizzy over something that isn&#8217;t that big a problem. I suspect that no one living outside of New York or LA has ever seen the kind of operation that Soderbergh is referring to &#8212; we certainly have no sidewalk-huckster equivalent to Canal Street in Salt Lake, at least not one I&#8217;m familiar with &#8212; and I don&#8217;t know anyway who has ever purchased a bootleg tape or DVD of a film that is otherwise available for viewing. (Copies of films that are otherwise unavailable &#8212; as in out-of-print or never released on home video &#8212; are another matter.) Regardless of how widespread the problem actually is, however, the industry has certainly convinced itself that it&#8217;s a problem, and the resulting hysteria is creating some genuine inconveniences for the average movie fan, starting with those overwrought anti-piracy PSAs that are now running before the feature in some theaters and scaling up from there. If Soderbergh&#8217;s simultaneous release scheme can soothe the industry&#8217;s fears in a simple manner that doesn&#8217;t involve all kinds of restrictions on the consumer end of things, then I say it&#8217;s worth a try. And maybe, just maybe, it may even lead to some improvements, both in how the industry is doing things and in what it&#8217;s producing. And besides, there are always movies that I&#8217;m interested in seeing but which don&#8217;t demand the big-screen experience, for one reason or another; now maybe I won&#8217;t have to wait so long to see them. It&#8217;s going to be an interesting experiment, if nothing else.<\/p>\n<p>I am, however, less supportive of one of Soderbergh&#8217;s other ideas:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I&#8217;d like to do multiple versions of the same film. I often do very radical cuts of my own films just to experiment, shake things up, and see if anything comes of it. I think it would be really interesting to have a movie out in release and then, just a few weeks later say, &#8220;Here&#8217;s version 2.0, recut, rescored.&#8221; The other version is still out there &#8211; people can see either or both.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I gotta say, I just don&#8217;t see the appeal of multiple versions. I hear a lot of talk about them from circles that combine an interest in technology with an interest in entertainment media &#8212; the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boingboing.net\/\">Boing Boing<\/a> crowd, for instance, which thrives on news of end-user remixes, mash-ups, and other altered versions of pre-existing art &#8212; and, of course, we&#8217;re all familiar with the director&#8217;s cuts, extended cuts, restored versions, unrated versions, and special editions that turn up on DVD. But with very, <i>very<\/i> few exceptions, I never like the revised versions as much as the original release version. (The only exceptions that come to mind are the <i>Lord of the Rings<\/i> Extended Editions and Francis Coppola&#8217;s recent <a href=\"http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/aeczl\">recut of <i>The Outsiders<\/i><\/a>, all of which drastically deepened their respective stories. However, you can make a pretty good argument that even these rare, successful cases suffer from new problems that weren&#8217;t there before the tinkering. There are added scenes in the lengthened <i>Return of the King<\/i>, for example, that I think actually <i>harmed<\/i> the film.) And that&#8217;s just talking about the variants produced by professionals; I have even less interest in the versions generated by amateurs, no matter how talented they may be, because they had nothing to do with the original production of the film.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps my inflexibility on this is just a sign of my advancing geezerdom, but I am deeply troubled by the increasing fluidity of our culture&#8217;s art, as well as by the fact that so many younger people actually <i>prefer<\/i> it this way and are pushing for even more &#8220;interactivity.&#8221; Everything that surrounds us these days is impermanent; worse, it&#8217;s all deliberately made to be disposable, consumed and then thrown aside. Personally, I like to think that there is some continuity <i>somewhere<\/i>, even if it&#8217;s only in something as superficial as watching a movie I loved in high school and knowing that it&#8217;s the <i>same<\/i> movie I saw in high school, with the same run-time, number of scenes, thematic emphasis, and now-outdated special effects. Even better, I like to think that when I watch a movie made in 1942, it&#8217;s the same movie that an audience of 1942 would&#8217;ve seen. This doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m opposed to restoration, or the inclusion of deleted scenes on DVDs for archival purposes, or even necessarily to remakes. I just think the original package ought to remain unaltered.<\/p>\n<p>At least Soderbergh, to his credit, says he&#8217;d like to see both versions remain available to the audience. That&#8217;s what really gets to me about all these recuts &#8212; when the director&#8217;s cut comes out, the original cut usually falls into oblivion. (George Lucas, I am talking to you!) And that&#8217;s just wrong&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following up on something I mentioned in last night&#8217;s rambling entry on the movie business, I&#8217;ve found an interview that director Steven Soderbergh gave to Wired magazine about his plans to release his new film on DVD, HD-cable TV, and in theaters all at the same time. Relevant to my purposes:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-film-studies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=453"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}