{"id":201,"date":"2005-03-17T16:16:38","date_gmt":"2005-03-17T16:16:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/?p=201"},"modified":"2005-03-17T16:16:38","modified_gmt":"2005-03-17T16:16:38","slug":"neogalactica_part_2_the_rant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/2005\/03\/17\/neogalactica_part_2_the_rant\/","title":{"rendered":"Neo-Galactica, Part 2: The Rant"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Before I proceed with my long-promised review of the new <i>Battlestar Galactica<\/i> remake series, there&#8217;s something I want to get off my chest: I am really sick and tired of the way every article I read about the new show starts out by trashing the original series. What is it about American culture that we can&#8217;t complement one thing without denigrating something else? It&#8217;s almost like one of Newton&#8217;s laws &#8212; for every positive word spoken there must be an equal and opposite insult.<br \/>\n<i>TV Guide<\/i> is especially guilty of this kind of needless hostility. For example, in next week&#8217;s issue, critic Matt Roush begins his comments about the new show&#8217;s season ender by saying, &#8220;If anyone had predicted a year ago that I&#8217;d be hooked on a new version of <i>Battlestar Galactica<\/i> &#8212; that cheesily juvenile and insipid &#8216;Star Wars&#8217; wannabe from the late &#8217;70s &#8212; I&#8217;d have laughed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That sort of remark is all too common in the press on Neo-G, and it really pisses me off.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>For one thing, the original <i>Battlestar<\/i> (Paleo-G?) was <i>not<\/i> a <i>Star Wars<\/i> rip-off, despite what most people seem to think. Yes, there are some superficial similarities between the two, but they really don&#8217;t mean much in my book. Consider two very important facts. First, <i>Galactica<\/i> was in the development stage well before <i>Star Wars<\/i> hit the movie theaters. It&#8217;s just a coincidence that two big space-opera projects were in the works at about the same time. (A new <i>Star Trek<\/i> series was under development then as well, but nobody accuses that project &#8212; which eventually morphed into <i>Star Trek: The Motion Picture<\/i> &#8212; of being a rip-off. For whatever reason, pop culture in the mid-70s was just naturally drifting toward adventures set in space.)<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, George Lucas and 20th Century Fox lost a lawsuit against Glen Larson and Universal because they couldn&#8217;t legally prove their accusations of plagiarism. Fox&#8217;s attorneys had compiled a long list of plot and visual elements that were supposedly unique to <i>Star Wars<\/i> and which Larson had supposedly copied from <i>Galactica<\/i>&#8216;s big-screen rival. The judge in the case was unimpressed, rightfully noting that most of the cited elements did not correspond as closely as the attorneys claimed they did. If the court determined that Paleo-G was not a rip-off of SW, then that&#8217;s good enough for me.<\/p>\n<p>(Incidentally, there&#8217;s an amusing footnote to that story: Universal, which produced <i>Galactica<\/i>, countersued Fox, claiming that Lucas had stolen his cute little <i>Star Wars<\/i> robot, R2-D2, from the cute little robots in Universal&#8217;s <i>Silent Running<\/i>. That was an even more ridiculous notion than Fox&#8217;s claims &#8212; SR&#8217;s Huey, Dewey and Louie look nothing like Artoo, for one thing &#8212; and I&#8217;m not sure the suit even made it into court. However, in an interesting coincidence, it turns out that <i>Galactica<\/i>&#8216;s special-effects wizard, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imageworks.com\/company\/bios\/jdykstra.html\">John Dykstra<\/a>, did reuse footage he&#8217;d shot for <i>Silent Running<\/i> on Paleo-G, specifically the domed &#8220;agro-ships&#8221; that are seen in several episodes. And if that isn&#8217;t incestuous enough for you, it also turns out that Dykstra worked on <i>Star Wars<\/i>, which to my mind is all the explanation you need for the visual similarities between the two. I don&#8217;t think it was a case of copying his earlier work so much as just building on prior experience.)<\/p>\n<p>In any event, it&#8217;s not as if <i>Star Wars<\/i> is such an original piece of work either. The plot is basically lifted from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.criterionco.com\/asp\/release.asp?id=116\">Kurosawa&#8217;s <i>The Hidden Fortress<\/i><\/a> with a few Western motifs and some World War II aerial dogfighting thrown in, while the film&#8217;s most memorable location &#8212; the desert planet Tatooine &#8212; bears a striking resemblance to Frank Herbert&#8217;s Arrakis, a.k.a. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dunenovels.com\/books\/dune.html\"><i>Dune<\/i><\/a>. That&#8217;s why I tend to dismiss accusations of artists ripping off one another. Everything is synthesized from something else, so there&#8217;s little point to these pissing contests over who borrowed what from whom. Especially in this case when it should be obvious to anyone who&#8217;s ever watched the damn show that it <i>isn&#8217;t<\/i> about the same things that <i>Star Wars<\/i> is about, once you get past the spaceships and things that go &#8220;boom.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now, as to Roush&#8217;s other insulting opinions about Paleo-G, there&#8217;s not much I can say about the charge that the show was juvenile. It was, and I freely admit that. But it was juvenile by design. As I explained in <a title=\"Neo-Galactica, Part 1\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/2005\/01\/neogalactica_part_1\/\">my first entry<\/a> on this subject, the network suits wanted it that way, because the show was running in primetime on Sunday evenings and because in their tiny little reptillian brains, &#8220;science fiction&#8221; meant &#8220;kid-stuff.&#8221; It&#8217;s hardly to fair to slam a twenty-five-year-old for being exactly what it was intended to be.<\/p>\n<p>When it comes to calling <i>Galactica<\/i> &#8220;cheesy&#8221; and &#8220;insipid,&#8221; I say it was no better or worse in that regard than any of its contemporaries. Just about <i>every<\/i> popular television show of the late &#8217;70s and early &#8217;80s can be called cheesy and insipid (although I personally wouldn&#8217;t, because I happen to like stuff from that era; yeah, it was generally pretty silly, but it was also generally a lot more entertaining than the programming we have now). I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again: context is key, people. Back in college, I hated the way certain professors insisted that historical context meant nothing when considering a novel, and I hate the way so many modern TV and film viewers do the same when they bash an older show.<\/p>\n<p>But even if the original <i>Galactica<\/i> is every bit as bad as modern viewers seem to find it, I don&#8217;t see why it&#8217;s necessary to constantly harp on that point. Yeah, Roush, we get it: you like the new show more than the old. So why don&#8217;t you just focus on the new, then, and leave the old one out of it, because believe it or not, there <i>are<\/i> still people out there who like the &#8217;70s version. It&#8217;s not like we&#8217;re a reluctant majority that has to be overcome, either. It&#8217;s pretty obvious we old-school fans are irrelevant to the development or success of the new show. Neo-G has already been renewed for a second season and, judging from the buzz on the message boards, just about everybody thinks it&#8217;s the televisual equivalent of the Second Coming. So why is it still necessary to begin every article on the new by giving the finger to the original?<\/p>\n<p>Enough, already!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Before I proceed with my long-promised review of the new Battlestar Galactica remake series, there&#8217;s something I want to get off my chest: I am really sick and tired of the way every article I read about the new show starts out by trashing the original series. What is it about American culture that we [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gripes-and-grumbles","category-the-glass-teat"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}