{"id":1454,"date":"2008-06-27T23:19:31","date_gmt":"2008-06-27T23:19:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/?p=1454"},"modified":"2008-06-27T23:19:31","modified_gmt":"2008-06-27T23:19:31","slug":"top_100_of_the_last_25","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/2008\/06\/27\/top_100_of_the_last_25\/","title":{"rendered":"Top 100 of the Last 25"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Great, more lists. This time we&#8217;re looking at <i>Entertainment Weekly<\/i>&#8216;s Top 100 Movies and Top 100 Books of the last 25 years. I&#8217;m not going to quibble with the actual rankings of these titles, since such things are almost entirely subjective in my opinion. My super-bestest faves aren&#8217;t likely to be yours, after all. But what I will do is follow in <a href=\"http:\/\/byzantiumshores.blogspot.com\/2008\/06\/ewwwwww.html\">Jaquandor<\/a>&#8216;s footsteps and bold the titles I&#8217;ve seen or read, with occasional commentary when I have something to say.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nMovies first:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><i><b>Pulp Fiction<\/b><\/i> (1994)<br \/>\nOkay, I guess I will quibble with placement, at least when it comes to this one. I so completely do <i>not<\/i> understand the affection so many hold for this flick. I think it&#8217;s an impossibly overrated, disturbingly amoral gimmick film. Tarantino reminds me of the obnoxious kid in grade school who was always disrupting class in a desperate effort to get the teacher&#8217;s attention, but when she finally acknowledged him, he had nothing to say. In that sense, <i>Pulp Fiction<\/i> is a perfect reflection of its creator. I <i>loathe<\/i> this flick and wouldn&#8217;t even have it in my top 100 list, let alone as <i>number one<\/i>.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Lord of the Rings<\/b><\/i> trilogy (2001-03)<br \/>\nA magnificent accomplishment. Even with all the recognition these films received, I don&#8217;t think most people understand how really good they are, how complete a job of world-building was done, or how unlikely it was that they&#8217;d turn out good at all.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Titanic<\/b><\/i> (1997)<br \/>\nAs I said in the previous entry, I really don&#8217;t get the backlash against this movie. <i>I<\/i> liked it. I <i>still<\/i> like it. And I&#8217;m man enough to admit it, too!<\/li>\n<li><i>Blue Velvet<\/i> (1986)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Toy Story<\/b><\/i> (1995)<br \/>\nCuriously, there seems to be something of a backlash building against this movie, too; I&#8217;ve read a lot of blogs lately that have said it&#8217;s not as good as Pixar&#8217;s later films. I disagree &#8212; I find this one eminently re-watchable, certainly superior to the seemingly better-liked <i>Toy Story 2<\/i>, and it is, of course, historically significant for being the first all-CG feature. It deserves its place on any &#8220;top&#8221; list.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Saving Private Ryan<\/b><\/i> (1998)<br \/>\nA good enough movie, for the most part, but vastly overrated. And William Goldman is right: the frame story is an outright lie. The movie would&#8217;ve been better without it.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Hannah and Her Sisters<\/b><\/i> (1986)<br \/>\nRemember seeing it, but don&#8217;t remember the movie.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Silence of the Lambs<\/b><\/i> (1991)<br \/>\nStill brilliant and chilling, even if Hannibal has been watered down by sequels, prequels, and countless stand-up routines.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Die Hard<\/b><\/i> (1988)<br \/>\nIt set the mold for a host of imitators, but still one of the greatest action movies ever.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Moulin Rouge<\/b><\/i> (2001)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>This Is Spinal Tap<\/b><\/i> (1984)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Matrix<\/b><\/i> (1999)<br \/>\nMeh. I never did get the fuss over this one. Entertaining enough, but ultimately kind of stupid. I&#8217;m with Joey Pants&#8217; character: is it so bad to be a slave in a tube if you think you&#8217;re eating real steak instead of gray glop? And wouldn&#8217;t Keanu have had zero muscle definition if he&#8217;d spent his entire life in a tube prior to getting flushed? It&#8217;s the little niggling questions like these that cause this movie to unravel for me.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>GoodFellas<\/b><\/i> (1990)<br \/>\nI <i>love<\/i> this movie. That said, I&#8217;m not one of those who thinks Scorsese got robbed by Costner on Oscar night. <i>Dances with Wolves<\/i> was a great flick, too, just different. Apples and oranges.<\/li>\n<li><i>Crumb<\/i> (1995)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Edward Scissorhands<\/b><\/i> (1990)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Boogie Nights<\/b><\/i> (1997)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Jerry Maguire<\/b><\/i> (1996)<br \/>\nUgh. Another one I do <i>not<\/i> get. Obnoxious in just about every way. Renee Zellweger squints through the entire flick, her kid is annoying, and the &#8220;you complete me&#8221; line is truly gag-worthy. Cameron Crowe is really hit or miss for me; this one is a tremendous miss. In a just universe, <i>Almost Famous<\/i> would be his most acclaimed flick.<\/li>\n<li><i>Do the Right Thing<\/i> (1989)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Casino Royale<\/b><\/i> (2006)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Lion King<\/b><\/i> (1994)<br \/>\nOverrated. <i>Beauty and the Beast<\/i> is the best of Disney&#8217;s output in the &#8217;90s.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Schindler&#8217;s List<\/b><\/i> (1993)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Rushmore<\/b><\/i> (1998)<\/li>\n<li><i>Memento<\/i> (2001)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>A Room With a View<\/b><\/i> (1986)<br \/>\nI <i>think<\/i> I&#8217;ve seen this. In truth, the Merchant-Ivory movies blur together in my mind&#8230;<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Shrek<\/b><\/i> (2001)<br \/>\nMeh. All the pop-cultural references are already dated, and am I the only one who thinks it would&#8217;ve been a more powerful movie if the princess had remained human and opted to be with Shrek regardless?<\/li>\n<li><i>Hoop Dreams<\/i> (1994)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Aliens<\/b><\/i> (1986)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Wings of Desire<\/b><\/i> (1988)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Bourne Supremacy<\/b><\/i> (2004)<br \/>\nHave I mentioned how much I hate the shaky-cam?<\/li>\n<li><i><b>When Harry Met Sally&#8230;<\/b><\/i> (1989)<br \/>\nA romantic movie that works for men <i>and<\/i> women. Why don&#8217;t they make &#8217;em like this more often?<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Brokeback Mountain<\/b><\/i> (2005)<br \/>\nBeautiful and heart-breaking.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Fight Club<\/b><\/i> (1999)<br \/>\nA good movie, but not nearly as profound as its cultish fans believe. And I hate the dreary, humid <i>dankness<\/i> of it all. This and <i>Seven<\/i> are responsible for a decade of truly <i>ugly<\/i> filmmaking.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Breakfast Club<\/b><\/i> (1985)<br \/>\nA classic for we people of a certain age. I wonder if today&#8217;s teens would still relate to it?<\/li>\n<li><i>Fargo<\/i> (1996)<br \/>\nI need to see this.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Incredibles<\/b><\/i> (2004)<br \/>\nPossibly the best cartoon ever made for grown-ups. Love everything about it, from the groovy &#8217;60s spy-movie production design to the voice work to the genuinely funny jokes and tear-jerking pathos.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Spider-Man 2<\/b><\/i> (2004)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Pretty Woman<\/b><\/i> (1990)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind<\/b><\/i> (2004)<br \/>\nMeh.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Sixth Sense<\/b><\/i> (1999)<br \/>\nI think this one holds up quite well, even if you figure out the twist or have seen it before. It&#8217;s some of Bruce Willis&#8217; finest work. Too bad M. Night Shyamalan has turned out to be something of a one-trick pony.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Speed<\/b><\/i> (1994)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Dazed and Confused<\/b><\/i> (1993)<br \/>\n<i>Love<\/i> this one&#8230; my teen years were in the &#8217;80s instead of the &#8217;70s, but so much of this still ran true and looked familiar. And it&#8217;s the only movie where I&#8217;ve actually <i>liked<\/i> Matthew McConnaughey, so that&#8217;s got to be worth <i>something<\/i>.<\/li>\n<li><i>Clueless<\/i> (1995)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Gladiator<\/b><\/i> (2000)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Player<\/b><\/i> (1992)<br \/>\nSaw it, don&#8217;t remember it.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Rain Man<\/b><\/i> (1988)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Children of Men<\/b><\/i> (2006)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Men in Black<\/b><\/i> (1997)<br \/>\nI&#8217;m with Jaquandor on this one: it&#8217;s a pleasant little comedy, but one of the best of the last quarter century? How do you get that?<\/li>\n<li><i>Scarface<\/i> (1983)<br \/>\nI need to see this one, too.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon<\/b><\/i> (2000)<br \/>\nNeed to see this one again, since I don&#8217;t remember much.<\/li>\n<li><i>The Piano<\/i> (1993)<\/li>\n<li><i>There Will Be Blood<\/i> (2007)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad<\/b><\/i> (1988)<br \/>\nI&#8217;ve never been very fond of this variety of humor, the absurd-slapsticky thing. Leslie Neilson is an appealing lead, though.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Truman Show<\/b><\/i> (1998)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Fatal Attraction<\/b><\/i> (1987)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Risky Business<\/b><\/i> (1983)<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s so strange to watch this now and see how natural and unaffected Tom Cruise&#8217;s performances used to be. I miss the real Tom instead of the android that now uses his face.<\/li>\n<li><i>The Lives of Others<\/i> (2006)<\/li>\n<li><i>There\u2019s Something About Mary<\/i> (1998)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Ghostbusters<\/b><\/i> (1984)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>L.A. Confidential<\/b><\/i> (1997)<\/li>\n<li><i>Scream<\/i> (1996)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Beverly Hills Cop<\/b><\/i> (1984)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>sex, lies and videotape<\/b><\/i> (1989)<br \/>\nI know I saw this back in the day, but couldn&#8217;t even tell you the premise now. I remember thinking it was weird and not my cup of tea. I suppose I ought to give it another look&#8230;<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Big<\/b><\/i> (1988)<br \/>\nAnother flick I thought everybody liked but which seems to be developing a backlash. I still like it&#8230;<\/li>\n<li><i>No Country For Old Men<\/i> (2007)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Dirty Dancing<\/b><\/i> (1987)<br \/>\nAs I&#8217;ve said before, one of my personal classics.<\/li>\n<li><i>Natural Born Killers<\/i> (1994)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Donnie Brasco<\/b><\/i> (1997)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Witness<\/b><\/i> (1985)<br \/>\nPossibly Harrison Ford&#8217;s best performance, if not his best movie. Someone in college once told me that this was just another example of imperial-colonialist filmmaking, i.e., a movie that requires an average white guy to serve as our access point into a little-understood culture. This conversation was my first inkling that I didn&#8217;t fit into the world of academe as well as I had hitherto imagined.<\/li>\n<li><i>All About My Mother<\/i> (1999)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Broadcast News<\/b><\/i> (1987)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Unforgiven<\/b><\/i> (1992)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Thelma &amp; Louise<\/b><\/i> (1991)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Office Space<\/b><\/i> (1999)<\/li>\n<li><i>Drugstore Cowboy<\/i> (1989)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Out of Africa<\/b><\/i> (1985)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Departed<\/b><\/i> (2006)<\/li>\n<li><i>Sid and Nancy<\/i> (1986)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Terminator 2: Judgment Day<\/b><\/i> (1991)<br \/>\nIf we&#8217;re talking &#8220;best movies,&#8221; the first <i>Terminator<\/i> is by far superior to this one.<\/li>\n<li><i>Waiting for Guffman<\/i> (1996)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Michael Clayton<\/b><\/i> (2007)<br \/>\nWha? I thought this was a good-enough movie, largely because Clooney delivers a strong performance, but it wasn&#8217;t anything all that special. It was a plot we&#8217;d basically seen before&#8230;<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Moonstruck<\/b><\/i> (1987)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Lost in Translation<\/b><\/i> (2003)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Evil Dead 2: Dead by Dawn<\/b><\/i> (1987)<br \/>\nAn unexpected choice for this list, but glad to see it here. Sam Raimi and Bruce Campbell rock&#8230;<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Sideways<\/b><\/i> (2004)<br \/>\nAn excellent movie, and also a really damn depressing one if you happen to be a man of a certain age who still hasn&#8217;t achieved the goals you thought you&#8217;d have reached long before that age&#8230;<\/li>\n<li><i>The 40 Year-Old Virgin<\/i> (2005)<\/li>\n<li><i>Y Tu Mam\u00e1 Tambi\u00e9n<\/i> (2002)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Swingers<\/b><\/i> (1996)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery<\/b><\/i> (1997)<br \/>\nI maintain that you if you took the best bits from all three Austin Powers movies and cut them together, you might &#8212; <i>might<\/i> &#8212; end up with one consistently good one.<\/li>\n<li><i>Breaking the Waves<\/i> (1996)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Napoleon Dynamite<\/b><\/i> (2004)<br \/>\nUgh. The most painfully unfunny movie of the last 25 years, perhaps. Why is this thing so popular? I never will understand it&#8230;<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Back to the Future<\/b><\/i> (1985)<br \/>\nThe little movie that could. It never gets old.<\/li>\n<li><i>Menace II Society<\/i> (1993)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Ed Wood<\/b><\/i> (1994)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Full Metal Jacket<\/b><\/i> (1987)<\/li>\n<li><i>In the Mood for Love<\/i> (2001)<\/li>\n<li><i>Far From Heaven<\/i> (2002)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>Glory<\/b><\/i> (1989)<br \/>\nMakes me cry every time.<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Talented Mr. Ripley<\/b><\/i> (1999)<\/li>\n<li><i><b>The Blair Witch Project<\/b><\/i> (1999)<br \/>\nGarbage! Garbage, garbage, garbage! Shrill, unlikable characters and nausea-inducing camera work that leave you ultimately feeling exhausted, rather than scared or exhilirated. Just goes to show you what a lot of hype can do for your box-office returns. And how far the horror genre has fallen.<\/li>\n<li><i>South Park: Bigger Longer &amp; Uncut<\/i> (1999)<br \/>\nOn my &#8220;to see&#8221; list. I nearly gambled and bought it from the five-dollar bin the other night, for whatever that&#8217;s worth&#8230;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>So what&#8217;s missing from this list? Jaquandor mentioned <i>The Shawshank Redemption<\/i>, which I&#8217;d probably include, and <i>Braveheart<\/i>, which I probably would not. (I remember liking this when it first came out but haven&#8217;t had any desire to revisit it, which leads me to think my initial response may have been more to the hype than the film. Or it may be because I&#8217;ve lost so much respect for Mel Gibson in recent years. With the exception of <i>The Road Warrior<\/i>, I find it very hard to watch him anymore.) I&#8217;d also add <i>Almost Famous<\/i>, as I mentioned above, and <i>Wonder Boys<\/i>, a wonderful movie that went criminally unnoticed due to (I believe) a lousy marketing campaign. It includes some of Michael Douglas&#8217; best work; if you haven&#8217;t seen it, you should. And finally, where&#8217;s the love for <i>Dances with Wolves<\/i>? This, like <i>Titanic<\/i>, seems to be a victim of its own success &#8212; everybody loved it at first, then suddenly started resenting the fact that everybody loved it. Well, I <i>still<\/i> love it. So there.<\/p>\n<p>Moving on to books now&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>[Ed. note: Given the length of these lists, I decided to chop this into two parts. Check the next entry for the top 100 books, according to EW, and my thoughts on some of them&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Great, more lists. This time we&#8217;re looking at Entertainment Weekly&#8216;s Top 100 Movies and Top 100 Books of the last 25 years. I&#8217;m not going to quibble with the actual rankings of these titles, since such things are almost entirely subjective in my opinion. My super-bestest faves aren&#8217;t likely to be yours, after all. But [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-film-studies","category-memes-and-quizzes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1454"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1454\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}