{"id":1354,"date":"2008-04-04T11:12:47","date_gmt":"2008-04-04T11:12:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/?p=1354"},"modified":"2008-04-04T11:12:47","modified_gmt":"2008-04-04T11:12:47","slug":"dont_eat_the_snow_in_hawaii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/2008\/04\/04\/dont_eat_the_snow_in_hawaii\/","title":{"rendered":"Don&#8217;t Eat the Snow in Hawaii"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To my knowledge, I&#8217;ve never really had a genuine, honest-to-gosh <i>nemesis<\/i>, but I&#8217;m beginning to think it just might be Matthew McConaughey. Yes, <i>that<\/i> Matthew McConaughey, the naked-bongo-playing goodtime-funboy with the perfect six-pack abs and the spotty box-office record.<\/p>\n<p>And why, you may ask, would I elevate this inoffensively goofy would-be movie star to the level of &#8220;nemesis&#8221;? Well, first, he brought his special kind of blandness to <a title=\"Movie Review: Sahara\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/2005\/05\/film_review_sahara\/\">Dirk Pitt<\/a>, the literary swashbuckler whose adventures I devoured as a youth. Now, <a href=\"http:\/\/screenrant.com\/archives\/mcconaughey-pi--1530.html\">according to ScreenRant.com<\/a>, he may be in line to transform another of my puberty-era heroes into one of his signature sleepy-eyed slacker doofuses (doofi?): Thomas Magnum, a.k.a. Magnum, P.I., the Ferrari-driving, Hawaii-based TV detective played in the 1980s by Tom Selleck.<\/p>\n<p>Sigh.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not that I <i>hate<\/i> the guy or anything &#8212; the mere sight of his face doesn&#8217;t make me want to strangle him, not like, say, Adam Sandler. Indeed, he seems like he&#8217;d probably be an okay guy to have sitting on the barstool next to you on a Friday afternoon at your favorite beer tavern. But as an actor, as a movie star, I just don&#8217;t understand why people like Matthew McConaughey. He&#8217;s got a pretty body and a face best described as &#8220;cute,&#8221; but no charisma, no spark, no &#8220;It.&#8221; At least not in my opinion. I find him utterly boring, to be honest.<\/p>\n<p>As to this specific role, Magnum is a better fit for him than Dirk Pitt was, but still not a <i>good<\/i> fit. He can easily handle the beach-bum aspect of the character, but the thing that no one seems to remember about Magnum is that he could be a right bastard when he had to be, especially in the episodes that had anything to do with his Vietnam experiences or the unfinished business thereof, and I just can&#8217;t see McConaughey being able to pull off the cold-blooded stuff. He&#8217;s too much of a lightweight. His portrayal of Dirk Pitt suffered from the same problem; he&#8217;s just not credible as a guy who&#8217;s supposed to be made of tempered steel underneath the tan.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, it&#8217;s entirely possible that a big-screen <i>Magnum<\/i> remake will be played for laughs, as so many other TV-to-movie projects have been, obviating the need for McConaughey to be convincingly tough. I&#8217;m sure any of my long-time readers can guess where I stand on <i>that<\/i> idea.<\/p>\n<p>In case you&#8217;re wondering about the title of this entry, &#8220;Don&#8217;t Eat the Snow in Hawaii&#8221; was the title of the original <i>Magnum P.I.<\/i> pilot movie. However, in this context, when we&#8217;re faced with the possibilities both of Matthew &#8220;Mc-Bora-hey&#8221; trying to fill Tom Selleck&#8217;s Top-Siders and of a spoof <i>Magnum<\/i> rather than a respectful updating, well, then the title takes on a somewhat different connotation. Because the snow in this case has a distinctly yellowish tinge, if you take my meaning.<\/p>\n<p>As long as I&#8217;m all revved up anyhow, and at great risk of sounding like a whiny old poop, when is this trend of remaking every damn thing going to end anyhow? I&#8217;m getting really tired of all the stuff I loved as a kid being &#8220;reimagined&#8221; into pale imitations of their former selves. The one saving grace of these exercises in branding &#8212; because that&#8217;s what remakes really are as far as the studio suits are concerned, just familiar and exploitable names rather than ideas that really need to be updated &#8212; is that they seem to magically fade from memory as you&#8217;re walking out of the theater, so it&#8217;s not like they displace the originals. They&#8217;re as insubstantial and ultimately harmless as soap bubbles. But still, it&#8217;s annoying to think that somebody out there thinks that stuff like old <i>Magnum<\/i> episodes &#8212; which are readily available on DVD &#8212; aren&#8217;t good enough for modern audiences.<\/p>\n<p>Look, I love Hollywood. I love Hollywood movies. I used to get angry with the snobs who decreed that nothing that came from a big studio could possibly be as good or as original as some impenetrable Hungarian <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cin%C3%A9ma_v%C3%A9rit%C3%A9\">cinema-verite<\/a> bauble about unemployed fisherman who sit in darkened rooms and smoke all day long. But these days I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if maybe those film-school types had a point about Hollywood being out of ideas. I mean, come on&#8230; a big-screen version of every television show ever? A <a href=\"http:\/\/io9.com\/375484\/bill-and-teds-completely-unnecessary-remake\">remake of frickin&#8217; <i>Bill and Ted<\/i><\/a>, for god&#8217;s sake? Yeah, that movie is a little dated now, but what possible reason is there for going back to it, other than the crass belief that people will go see anything that has a familiar-sounding title?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To my knowledge, I&#8217;ve never really had a genuine, honest-to-gosh nemesis, but I&#8217;m beginning to think it just might be Matthew McConaughey. Yes, that Matthew McConaughey, the naked-bongo-playing goodtime-funboy with the perfect six-pack abs and the spotty box-office record. And why, you may ask, would I elevate this inoffensively goofy would-be movie star to the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-film-studies","category-the-glass-teat"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1354\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}