{"id":1257,"date":"2008-01-18T17:30:25","date_gmt":"2008-01-18T17:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/?p=1257"},"modified":"2008-01-18T17:30:25","modified_gmt":"2008-01-18T17:30:25","slug":"under_construction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/2008\/01\/18\/under_construction\/","title":{"rendered":"Under Construction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.aolcdn.com\/aolmovies\/star-trek-uss-enterprise-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"J.J. Abrams' take on the &lt;i&gt;Enterprise&lt;\/i&gt;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/images\/startrek_reboot_enterprise.jpg\" width=\"550\" height=\"234\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This image is the first official still released from the upcoming feature-film reboot of <i>Star Trek<\/i>, and our first glimpse of what the good ship <i>Enterprise<\/i> is going to look like in this all-new take on the classic TV series. Just consider it the photo that launched a thousand blog posts. Click on it to be taken to a nice, big, magnifiable version that we can all obsess over.<br \/>\nAs you can see, it depicts our old friend under construction. It&#8217;s a powerful image, capable of inducing Pavlovian drool responses in old-school fanboys like myself, not to mention the spontaneous generation of truly astounding levels of geeky analysis.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>(I could mention, for example, that this &#8220;rebooted&#8221; <i>Enterprise<\/i> appears to have the same contours as the original television starship, but the surface detailing of the version that appeared in <i>Star Trek: The Motion Picture<\/i>. It&#8217;s a compromise the pleases me greatly, as I&#8217;ve been concerned that the producers would do horrible things to the old girl that would leave her barely recognizable. However, I will say that I&#8217;m not liking the apparent coloration of the ship. Granted, this is a very dark scene, but the Big E looks to be the dark and gloomy gray of the ships in later incarnations of the long-running franchise, like the last couple of <i>Next Gen<\/i> movies and the disastrous final spin-off series, <i>Enterprise<\/i>, and it&#8217;s a look I don&#8217;t care for. Yes, I could mention all this&#8230; but I won&#8217;t. Because that would be too revealing of the depths of my geekiness&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>The image is also symbolic of the philosophy that apparently lies behind this movie, which is that we&#8217;re literally starting over at square one, beginning with the building of the most famous starship in all of science fiction. It&#8217;s a very clever marketing strategy, when you think about it. Releasing this particular image first simultaneously reassures the older fanbase that J.J. Abrams isn&#8217;t retooling things so drastically, but it also entices the young kids with the &#8220;kewl&#8221; factor. And it is, in my not-so-humble opinion, a pretty damn cool picture.<\/p>\n<p>(The trailer from which this image comes is pretty cool, too; it&#8217;s apparently playing in front of this weekend&#8217;s big monster-movie release <i>Cloverfield<\/i>, which is also an Abrams flick. I don&#8217;t know of any official version of the trailer out there on the web, but I have seen <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=lhZePr-R-PU&amp;eurl=http:\/\/www.badastronomy.com\/\">a bootleg<\/a> that was shot by some guy with his phone-cam or something. It&#8217;s good enough quality to tell what you&#8217;re looking at, if you&#8217;re curious; the audio tracks of famous historical &#8220;space recordings,&#8221; culminating in the familiar fanfare as we pull out to reveal the <i>Enterprise<\/i> hull, raised the hair on this old fanboy&#8217;s arms. Can&#8217;t wait to see a decent-rez version.)<\/p>\n<p>That said, however, I&#8217;m still not very excited about this movie. A lot of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.badastronomy.com\/\">other<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/screenrant.com\/\">bloggers<\/a> are, but I just can&#8217;t muster much enthusiasm for a movie that I think is totally unnecessary. As much as I love <i>Star Trek<\/i>, I think the premise was mined out long ago &#8212; what can possibly be left to say about or within this particular universe after five long-running series and ten feature films? And that&#8217;s not even mentioning all the other series that have been heavily informed by the <i>Trek<\/i> premise. (I&#8217;m thinking specifically of <i>Stargate SG-1<\/i>, which was essentially <i>Trek<\/i> without a ship.)<\/p>\n<p>I also think &#8212; no, I <i>know<\/i> &#8212; that I&#8217;m going to have a hard time accepting a new cast playing the iconic <i>Trek<\/i> characters. Sorry, kids, but William Shatner is always going to be The One True Kirk. I really wish the fans who won&#8217;t let the franchise die and the producers who are always eager to squeeze a little more blood out of the turnip would just back off and let <i>Trek<\/i> be what it&#8217;s always been: a 40-year-old television series that was remarkable in many ways, which inspired a remarkable phenomenon, but is ultimately, as Shatner said in that infamous <i>SNL<\/i> sketch, <i>just an old TV show<\/i>. It&#8217;s over, and it ought to be allowed to be over and stay over. We&#8217;ll always have our DVDs (preferably the original, unaltered versions)&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This image is the first official still released from the upcoming feature-film reboot of Star Trek, and our first glimpse of what the good ship Enterprise is going to look like in this all-new take on the classic TV series. Just consider it the photo that launched a thousand blog posts. Click on it to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-star-trek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1257"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jasonbennion.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}