<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Simple Tricks and Nonsense</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://jasonbennion.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2011-03-08:/4</id>
    <updated>2013-05-15T17:49:10Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The official website of R. Jason Bennion. Mostly I&apos;m just an analog kind of guy lost in a digital world...</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 5.12</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Trailer for The Boys at the Bar</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/trailer-for-the-boys-at-the-bar.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3094</id>

    <published>2013-05-15T17:05:19Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-15T17:49:10Z</updated>

    <summary>This morning, director Richard Dutcher and Project 23 have made the trailer for The Boys at the Bar, the movie I discussed in the previous entry, available to the public. (Previously, you could only see it by invitation.) Take a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="project23" label="Project 23" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="richarddutcher" label="Richard Dutcher" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="theboysatthebar" label="The Boys at the Bar" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[This morning, director Richard Dutcher and Project 23 have made the trailer for <i>The Boys at the Bar</i>, the movie I discussed in the previous entry, available to the public. (Previously, you could only see it by invitation.) Take a look:<br /><br /><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HVJrZ7jrQ1Q" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="281" width="500"></iframe><br /><br />Like I said last night, it appears to be a rambling but amiable kind of affair, the sort of movie where nothing much happens, but you end up feeling like you've just spent a couple hours hanging out with people you like... I'm thinking of something like <i>Diner </i>or Richard Linklater's sublime <i>Before Sunrise</i>, both of which I liked very much. And hey, this flick has both a hot redhead <i>and </i>a monkey! How can that not entice you even a little bit?<br /><br />Just as a reminder, the <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2076544505/the-boys-at-the-bar-a-richard-dutcher-film">Kickstarter campaign</a> to fund post-production and marketing for <i>The Boys at the Bar</i> is winding down soon and could use your help. I hear that the highest donor between 8 AM and midnight tonight will win a highly realistic replica of Ving Rhames' decapitated head, used in Dutcher's horror movie <i>Evil Angel</i>. Imagine what you could do with that come Halloween! <br /><br /><br /> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Help Richard Dutcher Finish His Latest Movie</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/help-richard-dutcher-finish-his-latest-movie.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3093</id>

    <published>2013-05-15T04:00:06Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-15T14:16:39Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[I'm not sure if the name "Richard Dutcher" means anything outside of Utah, but he's pretty well-known here in my home state. A writer, director, and producer of independent films, he single-handedly invented so-called "Mormon cinema"&nbsp; with his 2000 effort,...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="filmmaking" label="filmmaking" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="movies" label="movies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="project23" label="Project 23" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="richarddutcher" label="Richard Dutcher" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="theboysatthebar" label="The Boys at the Bar" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[I'm not sure if the name "Richard Dutcher" means anything outside of Utah, but he's pretty well-known here in my home state. A writer, director, and producer of independent films, he single-handedly invented so-called "Mormon cinema"&nbsp; with his 2000 effort, <i>God's Army</i>, a semi-autobiographical movie about LDS missionaries struggling with questions of faith. The relative success of <i>God's Army</i> kicked off a fad of locally made movies that Dutcher would eventually disavow, as it became increasingly clear that their makers weren't interesting in seriously exploring the Mormon experience... or even in making their movies accessible to anyone except the faithful. Dutcher himself, meanwhile, was drifting into increasingly edgy territory in his subsequent films, earning the enmity of many people who'd considered him a hero only a few years before. <br /><br />His latest venture is something far less controversial than those films, though. It's called Project 23, an exercise in guerrilla filmmaking intended to teach its participants the entire process of making a movie, from concept through distribution. The end result of this exercise is a feature called <i>The Boys at the Bar</i>, a warm-hearted, character-based comedy starring Dutcher himself, Bo Hopkins (a well-known character actor, possibly best remembered as the leader of the Pharaohs gang in George Lucas' <i>American Graffiti</i>), and a former Playboy model named Scarlett Keegan. <br /><br /><i>The Boys at the Bar</i> is now in post-production and, getting to the point already, Project 23 needs money to finish their movie. Like everybody else trying to do something creative these days without involving The Man, they've been running a <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2076544505/the-boys-at-the-bar-a-richard-dutcher-film">Kickstarter campaign</a> to raise funding. Only now the campaign is coming down to the wire, and it's looking like they're going to fall short of their goal... which, given the way Kickstarter works, means they won't get <i>anything</i>. Not one penny.<br /><br />I've seen a trailer for this film, and I think it looks like a lot of fun, in the same rambling, shaggy-dog vein as <i>Diner</i>, one of my personal favorites. I'd like to see it get completed, because I'd like to see it. And I have a personal connection to it, as well. It just so happens that two friends of mine -- one of my high-school classmates and, in a brilliant example of how small this state can be sometimes, one of my high-school teachers -- are part of Project 23. They worked on <i>The Boys at the Bar</i>. And I want to support them in their efforts to fulfill one of their dreams.<br /><br />So here's where I make everybody reading this all uncomfortable and squirmy by asking you to please go to the <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2076544505/the-boys-at-the-bar-a-richard-dutcher-film">Kickstarter page for </a><i><a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2076544505/the-boys-at-the-bar-a-richard-dutcher-film">The Boys at the Bar</a> </i>and donate whatever you can to the cause. It doesn't have to be much. Even five bucks will help, the price of a latte. Just go to the page, watch the video there, read the copy, and at least give it some thought. But don't think too long. As of this writing, there are only four days left until the deadline...<br /><br />(If you'd like to know some more about this whole deal before you donate, <a href="http://filmmakermagazine.com/70438-richard-dutcher-on-project-23-and-the-boys-at-the-bar/">here</a>'s a good article in <i>Filmmaker Magazine</i>.)<br />

]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>I Knew I Liked This Guy... </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/i-knew-i-liked-this-guy.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3091</id>

    <published>2013-05-14T20:06:41Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-15T03:51:29Z</updated>

    <summary>Frank Darabont, who wrote and directed three of the best cinematic adaptations of the curiously difficult-to-film work of Stephen King -- The Shawshank Redemption, The Green Mile, and The Mist -- said something the other day that made me smile.Following...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="bladerunner" label="Blade Runner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="deckard" label="Deckard" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="frankdarabont" label="Frank Darabont" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[Frank Darabont, who wrote and directed three of the best cinematic adaptations of the curiously difficult-to-film work of Stephen King -- <i>The Shawshank Redemption</i>, <i>The Green Mile</i>, and <i>The Mist</i> -- <a href="http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/the-mist-frank-darabont-thomas-jane-on-angry-bleak-ending/#/0">said</a> something the other day that made me smile.<br /><br />Following a film-festival screening of <i>The Mist</i>, an audience member asked the movie's star, Thomas Jane, and Darabont about the movie's incredibly bleak ending, specifically whether there was any right choice Jane's character could have made under the circumstances. Darabont's answer went like this:<br /><br /><blockquote>"Whatever your 
interpretation is, that's the right one. That's why I made the movie. 
What do you think? Guess what, that's the right answer. ... Except for anyone who thinks that Rick Deckard is a replicant, they're ...
 wrong."<br /></blockquote>I love it when a pro validates my opinion. Especially when it involves one movie director calling out another one for not really understanding his own damn movie.<br /><br />(If you have no idea what I'm talking about, you must not be much of a <i>Blade Runner</i> fan. Ridley Scott, the director of that film, has long been pushing the notion that Deckard -- the film's protagonist, played by Harrison Ford -- is himself a replicant, i.e., one of the synthetic people Deckard spends the movie hunting down and killing. But that interpretation completely invalidates the whole bloody <i>point</i> of that movie. <i>Blade Runner</i> is about <i>empathy</i>, about learning to put yourself in the shoes of somebody else and see the similarities instead of the differences. Deckard gradually comes to understand that the "skin 
jobs" he's "retiring" are as human as he is, so he has no moral justification for murdering them, and in the end, he throws in his lot with the last of them by running away with Rachel. It's a very humanistic movie... assuming that the lead character is, in fact, a human being. If Deckard is just another replicant, he experiences no moral growth, and the movie's subtle, sensitive theme gets sacrificed for a cheap <i>Twilight Zone</i>-style twist. At least that's how I see it.)<br /><blockquote> 

</blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Amusing Literary Quip of the Day</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/amusing-literary-quip-of-the-day.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3092</id>

    <published>2013-05-14T17:24:23Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-14T18:09:24Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Being cranky about a Dan Brown book not being high literature is like yelling at a cupcake for not being a salad.&quot; -- John Scalzi(For the record, I&apos;m not a fan of Dan Brown. I&apos;ve never read any of his...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="danbrown" label="Dan Brown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="literarysnobs" label="literary snobs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="literature" label="literature" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA["Being cranky about a Dan Brown book not being high literature is like yelling at a cupcake for not being a salad." -- John Scalzi<a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2013/05/14/reminder-on-getting-signed-human-divisions-thoughts-on-dan-brown/"></a><br /><div align="right"><div align="left"><br />(For the record, I'm not a fan of Dan Brown. I've never read any of his stuff, so I have no opinion whatsoever about him, his stories, or his writing abilities. I will say that, from what I know about <i>The Da Vinci Code</i> and its sequels, I don't think he'd be my particular pint of beer. Nevertheless, I <i>do</i> seem to have a history of defending low-brow entertainment over serious art, whether we're talking about pulp versus Literature-with-a-capital-L, Hollywood blockbusters compared to indie darlings, or '80s pop metal against "important" music, so Scalzi's <a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2013/05/14/reminder-on-getting-signed-human-divisions-thoughts-on-dan-brown/">comment</a> -- made in the context of refusing to slam Brown for being immensely successful while not being generally considered a "good" writer --&nbsp; found a sympathetic ear with me. I've never understood the disdain that so many people seem to hold for simple escapism. Sometimes you really do just want to hear a story, or have a good time, and what's wrong with that?)<br /></div></div> 



]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>My Latest Acquisition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/my-latest-acquisition.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3088</id>

    <published>2013-05-12T19:36:28Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-13T05:05:49Z</updated>

    <summary>What you see up there at the top of this post is the cover of one of my favorite novels when I was around 11 or 12 years old -- middle-school age. While my friends were discovering Tolkien, I was...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="anniversary" label="anniversary" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="artwork" label="artwork" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="borisvallejo" label="Boris Vallejo" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="flashgordon" label="Flash Gordon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="illustration" label="illustration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div align="center"><img style="margin-top: 49px;" id="irc_mi" src="http://farm9.static.flickr.com/8024/7506090512_11f884ae6a.jpg" height="500" width="305" /></div><br />What you see up there at the top of this post is the cover of one of my favorite novels when I was around 11 or 12 years old -- middle-school age. While my friends were discovering Tolkien, I was devouring pulpier, frankly trashier stuff: Edgar Rice Burroughs' Barsoom tales, Doc Savage reprints, Alan Dean Foster movie novelizations, and anything relating to Flash Gordon, the space-adventure hero who started in a newspaper comic strip when my grandparents were still children, and who seems destined to undergo periodic revivals every couple of decades. (The latest, a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_Gordon_%282007_TV_series%29">misfire</a> of a TV series, came and went in 2007.)<br /><br /><i>Massacre in the 22nd Century</i> was the first of a series of six Flash novels that came out in 1980 and '81. They were written by a guy named David Hagberg, although I never learned that until decades later, after the Internet came along, because his name curiously does not appear anywhere in the books themselves. While I remember them as entertaining reads, their connection to the universe originally conceived by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Raymond">Alex Raymond</a> is tenuous at best. There is no Ming the Merciless in Hagberg's books, no planet Mongo. And even though the characters at the center of this series are named Flash Gordon, Dale Arden, and Dr. Zarkov, they are significantly "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-model">off-model</a>." I won't bore you with the details of how Hagberg deviates from the traditional Flash backstory; suffice it to say, I've long theorized that these books began as fairly generic space-opera adventures and some editor convinced him to change his protagonists' names in an attempt to cash in on the notoriously campy <i>Flash Gordon</i> movie that was released around the same time. (Christopher Mills, who runs the incredible <a href="http://space1970.blogspot.com/">Space: 1970</a> blog, <a href="http://space1970.blogspot.com/2011/05/flash-gordon-art-by-boris.html">asserts</a> that the Hagberg novels bear <i>some</i> resemblance to a Flash television series that was done in the 1950s, but I've never seen that version myself, so I can't say.)<br /><br />Even so, I have very fond memories of the first two books in Hagberg's series (somehow I never got around to reading the others). And one of the things I <i>especially</i> loved about them was their cover art by the master illustrator Boris Vallejo. In general, I've always gravitated more toward the work of Frank Frazetta; his style generally has a rougher, wilder edge to it, and his fleshier women push my buttons a bit more than Vallejo's, which seem to me a bit too smooth and perfect to be believably human. But the covers for the Hagberg books really appealed to me for some reason. I'm not ashamed to admit I spent long evenings during my adolescence closely studying the one above, lusting for Boris' lovely red-haired take on Dale, and imagining myself as the bare-chested, noble-looking hero standing protectively behind her. It was an ideal I could never meet, of course... but even today, this image evokes so much aspirational yearning in me. It reminds me of who I wanted to be before I discovered who I actually was.<br /><br />A few months ago, I stumbled across the <a href="http://www.imaginistix.com/">website</a> of Boris Vellejo and his wife Julie Bell -- who is also a commercial illustrator of some note -- and I learned that prints of pretty much every cover piece he ever painted are available for purchase... and Boris will even sign them for no extra charge! I've been babbling to The Girlfriend about this discovery ever since, certain that I wanted to get <i>something</i> from the site, but vacillating indecisively between the art from <i>Massacre </i>-- which Boris incongruously titled "Future Land" -- and the cover of the second book in Hagberg's series, <i>War of the Citadels</i> (officially called "<a href="http://www.imaginistix.com/details.cfm?Id=638">Flash Gordon</a>"), of which I'm also very fond.<br /><br />Well, I guess she finally grew tired of my dithering, because she took the decision out of my hands and surprised me for our 20th anniversary with this:<br /><br /> <div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/r_jasonbennion/8731900857/" title="My latest acquisition by jason.bennion, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7286/8731900857_be983c1f15.jpg" alt="My latest acquisition" height="500" width="357" /></a><br /><br /><div align="left">She made a good call, from the choice of the print to the red matte (her pick again -- I was thinking of a plain white one, myself, but in retrospect, she was right about the red making the colors in the painting pop). I absolutely adore this, and can't wait to hang it up. Anne may not be Dale Arden, and god knows I'm a <i>long </i>way from anything resembling Flash Gordon... but she awakens many of the same yearnings this painting always has. I'm thankful she's still standing with me in this strange future land in which we've found ourselves...<br /></div></div>

]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Friday Evening Videos: &quot;Willin&apos;&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/friday-evening-videos-willin.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3087</id>

    <published>2013-05-10T19:57:51Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-11T02:19:34Z</updated>

    <summary>So, this song popped into my head a couple days ago, as these things do from time to time, and it hasn&apos;t left yet. After having a fairly amusing conversation about it with my friend Anastasia, I thought maybe I&apos;d...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="lindaronstadt" label="Linda Ronstadt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="musicvideos" label="music videos" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nostalgia" label="nostalgia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[So, this song popped into my head a couple days ago, as these things do from time to time, and it hasn't left yet. After having a fairly amusing conversation about it with my friend Anastasia, I thought maybe I'd share it with all you fine people, too. You can thank me later.<br /><br />The song is called "Willin'," and I was frankly amazed that Anastasia --
 or anyone else in my circle of friends -- actually knew it, as I've always thought of it as somewhat obscure. It was originally 
recorded by the band Little Feat, and I like <a href="http://youtu.be/iguLpoV0SXc">their version</a> fine, but it is Linda Ronstadt's 1974 cover 
that's been on a continuous loop in my brain this week. Probably because her version was my first exposure to it. I'll talk about that in a moment, but first... the song: <br /><br /><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZRqHWDys5qE" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" width="480"></iframe><br /><br />I first encountered "Willin'" in a fairly unlikely context: you can hear about 10 seconds of it in one scene of James Cameron's film <i>The Abyss</i>. If you don't know that one, much of the story takes place inside an experimental underwater oil-drilling platform on the bottom of the ocean. In the scene in question, the rig is being towed to a new location, and as the camera zooms in on the cockpit of the "tug sub," the overalls-wearing pilot is singing along to this tune -- coming from a boombox duct-taped above her seat -- at the top of her lungs. Specifically, the line about driving every kind of rig that's ever been made. It's a cute gag -- what's a sub, after all, but another kind of rig? -- that serves to illustrate the earthy, blue-collar, average-jane-and-joe aspect of the movie's characters. They're roughnecks and truck drivers, despite their science-fictiony surroundings. <br /><br />Well, that brief snippet of incidental music was enough to pique my curiosity. It took me a long time to identify the song and track it down, and when I heard it all the way through for the first time, I loved it. But I also thought it was kind of weird. After all, here was a woman signing longingly about another woman, that beautiful girl back in Dallas... The song made a lot more sense when I learned it had been written for a man. Of course, this was in the early '90s, before I developed a taste for Melissa Etheridge and Joan Jett, and got used to the idea of women singing love songs about women.<br /><br />MTV-style music videos were still several years in the future when Linda Ronstadt recorded "Willin'," so all the clips I found of it were concert recordings. But that's fine, considering her skill with live performance. This particular one was made at the New Victoria Theatre in London, in November 1976, when Ronstadt was in her heyday as a rock-and-roll artist. She was also (I think) incredibly sexy at the time. The look on her face when she first says "willin'" about 20 seconds in... well, it does happy things for me. <br /><br />I remember I used to have a poster of her that I won at a county fair midway game. This would've been in the mid '80s, by which time Linda was moving past her rocker persona and starting to explore traditional songbook pop, so I've long suspected the carnie was trying to move some very old stock. Regardless, I had no idea then of who she was... but I hung the poster anyway because I liked her looks. I recall she was wearing a lot of bangles and a button-down shirt in the picture, and generally looked very soft and feminine in the way that 1970s "rocker chicks" had, and which went away in the more harshly-styled '80s. (I'll be honest, even though I tend to rhapsodize a great deal about the '80s -- the decade in which I was a teenager -- I generally think women's looks were sexier in the the '70s.) <br /><br />I'm just rambling at this point, so I'll leave you with the song and bid you all a good weekend. I'm going to head home now. And when I get there, I think maybe I'll fire up my old turntable and listen to some vintage Linda Ronstadt LPs... <br />


]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Star Destroyers Over Coruscant</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/star-destroyers-over-coruscant.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3085</id>

    <published>2013-05-07T19:29:53Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-08T04:17:10Z</updated>

    <summary>Nothing much to say here, I just wanted to repost some cool artwork I encountered over the weekend, when &quot;Star Wars Day&quot; was generating a feverish amount of related material: Click to see it in its full-sized glory.If it&apos;s not...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="artwork" label="artwork" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="stardestroyer" label="Star Destroyer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="starwars" label="Star Wars" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="starwarsexpandeduniverse" label="Star Wars Expanded Universe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[Nothing much to say here, I just wanted to repost some cool artwork I encountered over the weekend, when "<i>Star Wars</i> Day" was generating a feverish amount of related material:<br /><br /><a href="http://jasonbennion.com/images/star-wars_destroyers-over-coruscant.jpg"><img alt="star-wars_destroyers-over-coruscant.jpg" src="http://jasonbennion.com/assets_c/2013/05/star-wars_destroyers-over-coruscant-thumb-500x376-282.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="376" width="500" /></a> <div>Click to see it in its full-sized glory.<br /><br />If it's not immediately obvious to you, what we have here is a fleet of 
Imperial Star Destroyers in orbit around Coruscant, the galactic capital
 world seen in the prequel trilogy ("...the entire planet is one big 
city"). Besides being a wonderfully rendered piece of kick-ass imagery (pretty much <i>
anything</i> featuring a Star Destroyer is going to kick some ass), it's also
 a nice visual bridge between the two trilogies... certainly more elegant than the ham-fisted revisionism that substituted Hayden Christensen's youthful self for the more venerable Sebastian Shaw in the "holy trinity" of Force ghosts at the end of <i>Return of the Jedi</i>!<br /><br />I imagine the more casual fans in our audience might be wondering about the ship in the bottom left of this picture, the one that looks like a Star Destroyer suffering from boils. Unless I miss my guess, that's an Interdictor, a class of ship that's appeared in a number of Expanded Universe novels and comics. Interdictors are capable of generating an intense gravity field that yanks passing starships out of hyperspace, so they can be easily detained or destroyed by Imperial forces. Of course, postulating such technology opens a big old can of worms, namely, why didn't Darth Vader's battle fleet have an Interdictor when it was trying to blockade Hoth? Things would have gone very differently for Luke Skywalker and Friends if they'd been unable to jump to lightspeed! (God, I'm such a nerd!)<br /><br />Sadly, I don't have any info on who created this image, whether it's digital or a painting, or what context it originally appeared in, so I don't know if it's a fan-made piece or a licensed piece created for Lucasfilm. It's cool, regardless...<br /><br />Tip of the hat to Jaquandor for <a href="http://byzantiumshores.blogspot.com/2013/05/may-fourth-be-with-you.html">posting</a> this one, along with a lot of other fun stuff, on the Fourth. <br /></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Protesting... Something... But Doing It Fiercely</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/protesting-something-but-doing-it-fiercely.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3083</id>

    <published>2013-05-06T15:59:28Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-08T04:04:18Z</updated>

    <summary>Last Wednesday was just a weird day, man. It started with that phone call I told you about. It ended with a scene that was almost surreal enough for a Fellini movie. Almost.I had to work late that night. Not...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="protest" label="protest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="protesters" label="protesters" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="worklifebalance" label="work/life balance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[Last Wednesday was just a weird day, man. It started with that phone call <a href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/perspective-1.html">I told you</a> about. It ended with a scene that was almost surreal enough for a Fellini movie. Almost.<br /><br />I had to work late that night. Not terribly late, really, just a little under a couple of hours; the sun was still in the sky when I descended from the 13th Floor and exited out through the Mall. But the thing you have to understand about Salt Lake City is that very few people remain in the downtown area after 6 o'clock. Unlike other cities, few people live there, and there's just not much in the way of night life, despite the repeated attempts of mayor after mayor to find <i>some</i> way of coaxing dedicated suburbanites to stick around and spend their money in SLC proper, instead of fleeing to their outlying bedroom communities after the quitting bell rings. Which meant I had the platform all to myself as I waited for the next train heading toward my own bedroom community. There were a few passersby on the sidewalks across the street, outside the Mall, but the hum of activity that defines this block during the middle of the day had faded like an oven cools after you turn it off. There were no cars driving along Main Street, and a thick tide of silence seemed to descend the sides of the surrounding building one step ahead of the deepening shadows. <br /><br />I briefly considered dipping into my messenger bag for my book, but, as much as it pains me to admit this, I find I really don't enjoy reading anymore. Not after doing it at work all day long. That's something I probably ought to write about in more depth one of these days. But the important thing for now is that I was standing alone on a train platform in the middle of an eerily deserted city that felt something like a post-apocalyptic film from the early '70s. (Think of Charlton Heston's <i><a href="http://youtu.be/KvgF3cL10Fg">Omega Man</a></i>.)<br /><br />And that's when I heard it. An indistinct, rhythmic chanting. I tried to make out what the chanters were saying, but I'm not very good at that -- the cries of "DE-FENSE" at basketball games inevitably sound like "Sieg Heil!" to my ears. I tried to identify where it was coming from, but it was echoing off the concrete and glass canyons of the city, seeming to originate from everywhere and nowhere all at once. The only thing I was sure of was that it was coming closer. (I found myself thinking of <i>The Omega Man</i> again...)<br /><br />Then the cops arrived. Several police cruisers rolled into the intersection at one end of the block, their lightbars flashing. They parked so as to halt any traffic that might come along -- not likely -- and the officers threw open their car doors, stepped out into the street, and waited. <br /><br />A few moments later, a crowd of people appeared on one of the cross-streets, turning the corner past the police cordon onto Main and marching right past me. The marchers were all young, college age it looked like, and most of them were dressed in black. Many of them had covered their faces with black bandanas. Incongruously, there was a pretty blonde girl on a bicycle in their midst, as if she'd just been out for an evening ride, seen the protest, and thought it might be fun to tag along. The two protesters in the lead had a long black banner strung between them, the only sign I could see in the entire group. It read "End Capitalism," and had a dollar sign with a slash through it. <br /><br />Their chant was clear to me now. They were shouting "No justice, no peace... f**k the police!"&nbsp; The police standing by their cruisers in the intersection took this provocation rather calmly, I thought. <br /><br />As protests go, this one was pretty small. It took only a minute for the entire crowd to file past me, up to the end of Main Street, and turn westward around another corner, trailed by a slowly creeping cop car.<br /><br />They had just vanished from my view when two stragglers came after them, a couple of guys wearing the stylized <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Fawkes_mask">Guy Fawkes mask</a>s that have been <i>de rigueur</i> for protesters ever since the movie <i>V for Vendetta</i> was released in 2005. One of the cops called after them: "You know, your protest might be more effective if you all stuck together." The would-be Vs both turned and showed the cop their middle fingers, then took up the "f**k the police" chant.<br /><br />I remember thinking, "It might be more effective if people actually knew what the hell your protest is <i>about</i>."<br /><br />And then it was all over. The cops got back in their cars and drove away. The sound of the chanting faded away. And I was alone on a train platform at quarter-of-eight at the end of a very weird Wednesday, waiting for my ride home.<br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>It&apos;s a Silly Thing...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/its-a-silly-thing.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3084</id>

    <published>2013-05-04T15:54:24Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-04T15:58:16Z</updated>

    <summary>...this made-up fanboy holiday in celebration of our favorite space-opera movie saga of all time. As our colleague Jaquandor points out this morning, it would actually make more sense to reflect on the glory that is Star Wars on May...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="fanboy" label="fanboy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="maythefourthbewithyou" label="May the Fourth Be with You" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="starwars" label="Star Wars" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[...this made-up fanboy holiday in celebration of our favorite space-opera movie saga of all time. As our colleague Jaquandor <a href="http://byzantiumshores.blogspot.com/2013/05/may-fourth-be-with-you.html">points out</a> this morning, it would actually make more sense to reflect on the glory that is <i>Star Wars</i> on May 25, the day the original film was actually released. But hey, who am I to rain on the parade? People like their puns, after all, so...<br /><br /><br /><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-120002" alt="lg3XyH9" src="http://geek-news.mtv.com//wp-content/uploads/geek/2013/05/lg3XyH9.gif" height="500" width="500" /><br /> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>It&apos;s Like We&apos;re Living in the Future, Part XXVIII</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/its-like-were-living-in-the-future-part-xxviii.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3082</id>

    <published>2013-05-03T17:00:01Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-03T23:31:57Z</updated>

    <summary>The movie Blade Runner seems to be one of those polarizing flicks that either works for you or it doesn&apos;t. Despite its wide reputation as a classic that rose from the ashes of its initial failure at the box office,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="bladerunner" label="Blade Runner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cars" label="cars" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="edsel" label="Edsel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="futurism" label="futurism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[The movie <i>Blade Runner</i> seems to be one of those polarizing flicks that either works for you or it doesn't. Despite its wide reputation as a classic that rose from the ashes of its initial failure at the box office, I know a number of people who just don't understand the fuss that gets made over this one. And you know, that's perfectly valid. I feel the same way about <i>Pulp Fiction</i> myself. It's immensely popular, critically acclaimed, massively influential... and it does absolutely nothing for me. In fact, it actively repelled me the one and only time I actually watched it. So, yeah, <i>Blade Runner</i> critics, I hear you. But I don't agree with you.<br /><br />Personally, I find <i>Blade Runner</i> endlessly fascinating, especially its incredibly dense production design. The first time I saw the movie when I was about 13 or thereabouts, I didn't understand a lick about its themes of weary existentialism ("tears in the rain") or its defiant romanticism ("it's too bad she won't live... but then again, who does?"), but its depiction of a 21st century Los Angeles mesmerized me. Even now, when I watch it, I sometimes find myself slipping into a kind of reverie, not paying attention to what's happening on-screen so much as <i>where </i>it's happening. There are so many details in every shot, everything from brand logos to buzzing neon signs to weirdly menacing technology to plain old dirt and grime to that insane, dazzling blimp floating through shots as it shills for the Off-World Colonies. All this stuff builds on itself, layer after layer, to finally accrete into -- in my opinion -- one of the most realistic futuristic environments ever presented on screen. <br /><br />One little detail I particularly love is the lumbering juggernaut of an automobile you can see in one of the street scenes, an early-Sixties something I've never quite been able to identify  -- you get a pretty good look at it in <a href="http://youtu.be/4lj2ISTrfnE">this clip</a>, at about the 0:32 mark -- mingling with all the bubble-topped <a href="http://bladerunner.wikia.com/wiki/Spinner">Spinners</a> and boxy utilitarian transports of the imaginary year 2019. Growing up around old cars and the people who love them, I understand and believe in the idea that some folks will never let go and will find a way to keep their beloved old beasts on the road as long as possible. <br /><br />I found myself thinking of that scene this morning as I drove to the train station. I got stuck, as I so often do, in the middle of a morning convoy, a two-lane-wide "Mormon blockade," as we call them around here (because they so often consist of mothers taking their multiple children to school). But today, right there alongside all those boxy, utilitarian SUVs and aerodynamic, bubble-topped sedans and hybrids, was an Edsel station wagon from the late 1950s. <br /><br />Our real-world 2015 doesn't much resemble the dystopian 2019 of <i>Blade Runner</i> -- at least, not yet -- but that doesn't mean that life doesn't imitate art! At least closely enough to make a fortysomething nerd smile and write a blog entry about it...<br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Perspective</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/05/perspective-1.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3081</id>

    <published>2013-05-03T05:12:52Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-03T16:20:07Z</updated>

    <summary>I was just on my way out the door for work yesterday when my phone rang. My landline, to be specific. (Yes, I still have a landline. It suits my purposes to do so. Don&apos;t hate.) Figuring that it was...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="julieannjorgenson" label="Julie Ann Jorgenson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="juliejorgenson" label="Julie Jorgenson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="shaneroygillette" label="Shane Roy Gillette" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[I was just on my way out the door for work yesterday when my phone rang. My landline, to be specific. (Yes, I still have a landline. It suits my purposes to do so. Don't hate.) Figuring that it was most likely one of my parents at that hour, I answered it. A voice I didn't recognize asked, "Is this the blogger Jason Bennion?"<br /><br />"Excuse me?"<br /><br />"Are you the Jason Bennion who writes a blog?"<br /><br />A little uncertain of where this was going or whether I should answer, I finally said, "Um, yeah, I suppose I am. Who's this?"<br /><br />The man on the other end identified himself as the brother of Shane Gillette, then immediately launched into a diatribe about how wrong I'd been to make his brother out to be such a dirtbag, because it just wasn't true. Shane was a good person, the man asserted, who'd battled demons for years, who'd been up for four days hearing voices and was convinced the cops were chasing him that horrible morning, but he's taking his medication now and he's just <i>not </i>the dirtbag I describe, he's <i>not</i>. The man on the phone sounded very emotional about all of this, and was speaking very rapidly, but he finally gave me an opportunity to confess that I didn't have the slightest idea what or who he was talking about.<br /><br />"You were a friend of Julie Jorgenson, weren't you?" he asked. <br /><br />Ah. Yes. Now I understood. Julie. My coworker who was <a href="http://jasonbennion.com/2011/01/it-never-ceases-to-amaze-me.html">killed</a> in a car accident a little over two years ago. This man's brother -- Shane Roy Gillette -- was responsible for her death. <br /><br />The man on the phone continued in the same vein as before, repeating over and over that his brother had been misrepresented by the media, that he'd been out of his head and <i>not </i>high on drugs the morning his pickup truck slammed into the rear of Julie's car with such terrible force, that he hadn't even known there was marijuana in the truck and that there's a difference between the inactive THC found in his bloodstream and <i>active </i>THC (I have no idea if this is correct), and that I'd been wrong to write all those things I'd written. I let him talk, not knowing what else to do or say. The man eventually explained that Shane's attempts to plea-bargain were being denied, and he -- the brother who was talking to me -- had been googling for information on the case when something from my blog popped up in his search results. (I'm guessing it was probably <a href="http://jasonbennion.com/2011/01/rumors-confirmed.html">this entry</a>, in which I said some <i>very </i>unkind things indeed about Shane Gillette.) The man hadn't appreciated what he read... understandably so, I have to admit.<br /><br />He was running out of steam now, talking slower and repeating himself more, and I felt like I had to say <i>something</i> to him. "Look, I wrote those things two years ago," I began. "I was angry, and I was just going on what I'd read in the news. I hope things turn out for your brother."<br /><br />The man apparently had been ready for an argument, had expected me to be more defensive or belligerent or something, because I got the distinct impression that the wind had just fallen out of his sails. He mumbled a suggestion that I ought to take down my blog posts, or edit them, and then he said he'd just had to get all this off his chest. I thanked him for offering his perspective. Then he hung up. <br /><br />I've been thinking about the incident ever since. I'm more than a little shaken that he tracked me down at my home. I've never made any effort to conceal my real-world identity or location during my online activities, but I also haven't put my phone number here on my blog and invited disgruntled readers to call or stop by the house. If I were the paranoid type, I'd be locking my doors, hunkering down behind the couch, and jumping at every shadow that flashes across the window shades. Thankfully, this guy didn't seem to be threatening me or suggesting he wanted to do violence to me. He was just upset that I'd ripped on his brother. As I said, I understand. If I had a brother and stumbled across some smart-ass blogger calling him dirty names, I'd be upset too. However, the caller also expressed a lot of sympathy for Julie's family, which helped allay some of my worries that he might be waiting behind a bush somewhere. He's not lacking in empathy.<br /><br />And neither am I. So I find myself troubled by how easily I'd overlooked the possibility that Shane Roy Gillette might have a family and people who are hurting for him as much as the people who knew Julie are hurting. That Shane himself might not be a monster, but just a guy with problems who had an accident and now has to live with the consequences. I like to think of myself as such a fair-minded person, a genuine liberal all-people-are-essentially-good bleeding heart... but in Gillette's case, my sense of empathy totally deserted me. <br /><br />I don't mean to trivialize this situation in any way, but I keep thinking of the <i>Star Trek </i>episode "Arena." If you don't know it, briefly, it begins with an alien lizard race called the Gorn attacking a Federation outpost for no apparent reason. The <i>Enterprise</i> pursues the Gorn ship, intent on destroying it. But when the two ships pass through an unexplored star system, a third race -- the mysterious, god-like Metrons -- stops them dead in their tracks and sends Kirk and the Gorn captain to a barren desert environment to fight one-on-one... to the death. Naturally, Kirk eventually gets the best of the Gorn and prepares to do him in, but when he has his knife at the creature's throat, he has a change of heart. He refuses to kill the alien, conceding that maybe the Gorn had had their reasons for attacking the outpost, that perhaps they'd thought they were defending themselves against intruders. The lesson, of course, is that there are two (or more) sides to every story. It's all a matter of perspective. And we should be willing to exercise a little mercy in light of that fact. By realizing this before he took the Gorn's life, Kirk passed a test being conducted by the Metrons to determine just how advanced these two combatant species really were. But of course he passed... he's the hero. I fear that I failed essentially the same test two years ago. <br /><br />I'm not going to retract or apologize for anything I said about Shane Gillette in the past. Blogs are essentially a stream of consciousness, and I wrote what I wrote at the time I wrote it. I was angry then, and I see my expression of that anger as an act of honesty. I'm <i>still</i> angry about what happened to Julie. Whether Gillette was high or delusional really makes no difference in the big picture -- he shouldn't have been behind the wheel of that truck, and a beautiful young woman died because he was. But I do regret that in my anger, I caused more hurt to people who already had a boatload of it to deal with. I shall try not to make that mistake in the future. <br /><br />If nothing else, that phone call was a valuable reminder that words have power, and the online world is not so insulated from the real world as we all like to believe. <br />



]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Tomorrow Is Yesterday</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/04/tomorrow-is-yesterday.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3075</id>

    <published>2013-04-20T08:00:36Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-20T14:54:33Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s been a hell of a week, hasn&apos;t it? What say we enter the weekend on a more positive note, something that speaks of human curiosity and wonder rather than bloodshed? Something like... a photograph that looks like it came...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="spacecraft" label="spacecraft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spaceflight" label="spaceflight" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spaceshiptwo" label="SpaceShipTwo" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="virgingalactic" label="Virgin Galactic" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[It's been a hell of a week, hasn't it? What say we enter the weekend on a more positive note, something that speaks of human curiosity and wonder rather than bloodshed? Something like... a photograph that looks like it came from a science fiction movie, but was in fact taken from the Mojave Desert on April 3:<br /><br /><a href="http://jasonbennion.com/images/spaceshiptwo-moon.jpg"><img alt="spaceshiptwo-moon.jpg" src="http://jasonbennion.com/assets_c/2013/04/spaceshiptwo-moon-thumb-500x436-262.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="436" width="500" /></a>This was floating around the web a couple weeks ago, so my apologies if you've already seen it, but I'm just blown away by this. I'll confess, I haven't been nearly as enthusiastic about this vehicle -- Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo -- as I have with the other commercial spacecraft currently in development (or, in the case of the SpaceX Dragon, in operation!). While SpaceShipTwo <i>is</i> technically a spaceship -- it's designed to fly above the 62-mile altitude that's commonly held to be the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A1rm%C3%A1n_line">boundary of space</a> -- it's incapable of reaching the ISS or achieving even low-Earth orbit. Its flightplans will consist, essentially, of big parabolic hops. And its missions will be little more than tourist larks for the wealthy, rather than anything really practical or that furthers human exploration or expansion into space. In my mind, it's more of a toy than a real ship.<br /><br />That said, though, it is a <i>pretty </i>machine, and we may learn much from it once it goes into operation. Also, it will keep manned spaceflight -- of a sort -- in the public eye, which I think is of vital importance. And of course, it will provide photo ops like this one, which is just spectacular. I think a big part of its appeal is that, to old-school nerds such as myself, it's so <i>familiar </i>from our cinematic fantasies -- a friend of mine said when he saw this photo, his first thought was of the Starship <i>Enterprise</i> hanging in the sky in the original <i>Star Trek</i> episode "Tomorrow Is Yesterday," and I immediately knew <a href="http://youtu.be/oL8O2Cfc2P4?t=31s">what he was talking about</a> -- but it's <i>real</i>. The future is happening <i>now</i>.&nbsp; And that's pretty damn cool... <br /><br />The photo's source and a lot more information about SpaceShipTwo can be found <a href="http://www.space.com/20530-spaceshiptwo-virgin-galactic-test-flight.html">here</a>. Have a good weekend, everyone!<br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>In Memoriam: Carmine Infantino</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/04/in-memoriam-carmine-infantino.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3072</id>

    <published>2013-04-18T14:38:53Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-21T22:26:14Z</updated>

    <summary>August, 1978. I&apos;m eight years old, only a month away from my ninth birthday and the start of another school year. But that&apos;s still weeks in the future, an eternity in kid time. For now, it&apos;s summer vacation, it&apos;s hot,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="carmineinfantino" label="Carmine Infantino" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="comicbooks" label="comic books" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="marvelcomics" label="Marvel Comics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="obituary" label="obituary" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="starwars" label="Star Wars" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div align="center"><div align="left"><div align="center"><img class="decoded" alt="http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/155717_10151509030318376_1609857129_n.jpg" src="http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/155717_10151509030318376_1609857129_n.jpg" /><br /></div><br /><i>August, 1978. I'm eight years old, only a month away from my ninth birthday and the start of another school year. But that's still weeks in the future, an eternity in kid time. For now, it's summer vacation, it's hot, and my days are my own in a way they never will be again. I pedal my candy-apple-red Schwinn bicycle -- the one with the upswept handle bars and the banana seat -- to the old Riverton Drug Store. Inside the cool, air-conditioned hush of the store, near the big front windows that look out on the town's main drag (such as it is), I jangle the change in my pocket as I peruse the latest arrivals. I turn the wire spin-rack slowly, giving myself time to search, and to savor the quest. My eyes slide past the run-of-the-mill stuff: Superman, Batman, Richie Rich, Bugs Bunny, Casper the Lame-O Ghost. Those books are all fine, in their own ways, and I'll buy plenty of them on other days, but today I'm after something in particular. I've been hanging on the edge of a cliff for a month now, and I've </i>got <i>to know what happens next. There's a civil war about to explode on the water-planet Drexel, and Han Solo and Luke Skywalker are right smack in the middle of it... on opposite sides, naturally... And there it is! Issue number 14, "The Sound of Armageddon!" I have no idea what "armageddon" means -- I'll look it up in the family dictionary later -- but the cover takes my breath away. All my star-warrior heroes and friends reunited again after a long period of separate, parallel storylines... blasterfire, tension, action, whatever those funky reddish-pink ray things in the background are supposed to be! I can tell already that I'm looking at a 32-page, four-color epic! I make my purchase from the kindly man at the counter, roll up the comic, and stuff it in my back pocket. (This is long before we worried about whether or not something was "collectible," and there was no easier way to carry a comic or a paperback around.) Then I race for home, pumping my legs madly, closing the distance in a some kind of record time -- my own personal little Kessel Run. Dropping my bike on the back lawn, I dash for my treehouse, my sanctum, the one place on the whole Bennion Compound where I can be certain I'll be uninterrupted for a while, and, with the drowsy sounds of a stifling summer day in Utah pressing against my ear drums, I settle in to read my way back to that galaxy far, far away... </i><br /><br />The death of legendary comic-book artist Carmine Infantino two weeks ago today -- the same day as Roger Ebert -- wasn't quite the gut-punch that Ebert's passing was, but it definitely gave me pause. Another of the creative minds who contributed so much richness to the flavor of my childhood... gone. <br /><br />The official obituaries (typical example <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/06/arts/carmine-infantino-who-revamped-batman-and-the-flash-dies-at-87.html?_r=1&amp;">here</a>) all seemed to focus on Infantino's role in kicking off the so-called <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_Age_of_Comic_Books">Silver Age</a> of comics with his reinvention of The Flash -- a character created in 1940 who'd fallen into obscurity by the late '50s -- as well as his updating of the venerable Batman, which some credit with leading to the classic <i>Batman </i>television series of the 1960s. The Silver Age was, of course, an immensely significant time in comic-book history. As I understand it (which admittedly might not be fully, because I've always been a comics dilettante, as opposed to a true fan), comic books had been very popular throughout the Depression and World War II, but sales plummeted in the years after the war. The simplistic storytelling and often crude artwork of the Golden Age lost its appeal as Modernism took hold, and the form seemed to be on the verge of dying out. (It probably didn't help that this was also the time period when the comics industry came under attack by anti-communist witch-hunters and prudes like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fredric_Wertham">Frederic Wertham</a>.) But the work of Infantino and others brought a new level of relative sophistication to the medium, and changes in the business side of the industry reinvigorated sales, especially of superhero titles, setting the stage for the decades of success and evolution comics have enjoyed since. So, yeah, that's a big deal, and it's entirely proper that the obits lead with all that stuff. <br /><br />But for me <i>personally </i>-- and I'm sure this won't be the slightest surprise to anyone reading this blog -- what <i>really </i>matters was Carmine Infantino's work on the<i> Star Wars</i> comics of the late 1970s. <br /><br />It's probably hard to remember (or imagine, depending on your age) what it was like back then, during that strange interregnum between <i>Star Wars</i> (1977) and <i>The Empire Strikes Back</i> (1980), when the world was not yet completely awash in <i>Star Wars</i>-branded merchandise and tie-in media. (You&nbsp; know, that time when dinosaurs ruled the earth and we had to walk through the snow, uphill both ways, to get to school.) Back then, there was no Expanded Universe, no Internet forums or conventions, no animated spin-offs on TV. Darth Vader was not yet Luke Skywalker's father (my own suspicion is that he wasn't even Luke's father in George Lucas' mind, but that's another blog entry). We knew next to nothing about the characters of <i>Star Wars</i>, or the Old Republic or the Jedi. <i>Everything</i> was open for speculation, because all we had to go on was a single, two-hour movie, which, let's be honest, was pretty light on details. And we first-generation fanboys -- girls too, although fannish tendencies in the '70s were more pronounced in the male of the species than the female -- were <i>hungry </i>for more. Hungry in a way I don't think I've ever experienced since. We <i>ached </i>to know more about the backstory of our favorite movie, and to revisit the places and characters that had seized our young imaginations in a ferocious kung-fu grip. We wanted more <i>Star Wars</i>, more, <i>more</i> I say! More in any form we could get it... toys, games, posters... and most especially<i> more stories</i>. It was during this period that the Marvel Comics Group began publishing its officially licensed <i>Star Wars</i> monthly. For a long time, this was the <i>only</i> source of new SW adventures. Which means they loom very large in the memory and imagination of fans my age. Or at least in <i>my </i>memory and imagination. <br /><br />The first six issues of the Marvel series were a straightforward adaptation of the movie, but starting with issue #7, the comics started offering up all-new storylines that saw our heroes swashbuckling their way through fantastic space-opera scenarios and settings. I've heard the Marvel writers were given no real guidelines on what they could or couldn't do, other than a prohibition against Luke and Vader confronting each other directly (Lucas already knew that would have to happen in <i>Empire</i>). They were therefore free to invent pretty much anything they wanted... and they did, fleshing out a vast and diverse galactic civilization that, in retrospect, bears little resemblance to what we now understand as the <i>Star Wars</i> universe. But at the time, we star-kids accepted it all as gospel, from <a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Jaxxon">seven-foot-tall green humanoid rabbit</a>s to <a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Hoojib">energy-sucking furrball</a>s with human-sized intelligence and telepathic voices. I'll be honest: even though the Marvel series has long been considered apocryphal by Lucasfilm and is generally dismissed  as silly by modern fans, many of its details and events are every bit as "real" to me as anything we saw in the recent prequel movies.<br /><br />The series endured until 1986, three years beyond the release of <i>Return of the Jedi</i>, and it eventually comprised 107 issues, plus three double-sized "annuals." However, my own interest in it waned following the release of <i>The Empire Strikes Back</i>. The Marvel writers struggled to figure out how to handle Han Solo's absence -- remember, he was frozen in carbonite between the two movies, with an uncertain fate ahead of him -- and the comics just weren't the same without my favorite character in the mix. I never have gotten around to reading the later issues. But the issues published between the first two movies, in particular the story arcs involving the waterworld Drexel and a giant casino in space known as The Wheel, remain among my very favorite of all <i>Star Wars</i> stories. As it happens, this span coincides with the bulk of Carmine Infantino's <a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Carmine_Infantino">work</a> on the series. <br /><br />Infantino served as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penciller">penciler</a> on the interior art, meaning he was responsible for the overall look of the comics he worked on. He also did quite a few of the covers, including the one pictured above, the one I remember being so excited about when I was eight. His style was somewhat peculiar -- I remember one snarky letter-to-the-editor that asked if the artist used a T-square to draw everybody's jawlines -- but it was effective. His renditions of Our Heroes looked nothing like the actors who played them on screen,&nbsp; but they did look like the <i>characters</i>, if that makes sense. At least they did to me. During that interminably long gap between the movies, his Han Solo, Luke Skywalker, and Princess Leia were more vividly those characters in my mind than Harrison Ford, Mark Hamill, and Carrie Fisher were. I owe him a tremendous debt for helping to make that delay tolerable... and for giving me so many great images that I still carry with me today.<br /><br />I had a really great childhood, when I think about it.<br /><br />For more information on Carmine Infantino's career and an analysis of his art, see this excellent <a href="http://herocomplex.latimes.com/comics/carmine-infantino-an-appreciation-by-mark-waid/#/8">piece </a>from the <i>LA Times</i>. And until next time... Make Mine Marvel!<br /></div></div> 









]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Refuse to Be Terrorized</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/04/not-an-existential-threat.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3078</id>

    <published>2013-04-16T23:44:40Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-18T19:21:12Z</updated>

    <summary>Bruce Schneier is an acclaimed security expert whose commentary has informed much of my own thinking on what we ought to be doing in response to terrorism, and why much of what we have done has been pointless, if not...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="bostonmarathon" label="Boston Marathon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="bruceschneier" label="Bruce Schneier" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="securitytheater" label="security theater" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="terrorism" label="terrorism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="waronterror" label="War on Terror" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.schneier.com/">Bruce Schneier</a> is an acclaimed security expert whose commentary has informed much of my own thinking on what we ought to be doing in response to terrorism, and why much of what we have done has been pointless, if not downright harmful (e.g., the entire ridiculous kabuki act we have to endure to get on an airplane these days). He's written an <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/04/the-boston-marathon-bombing-keep-calm-and-carry-on/275014/">essay</a> for <i>The Atlantic</i> in response to the Marathon bombings that I think ought to be required reading for everyone in the country. Definitely click <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/04/the-boston-marathon-bombing-keep-calm-and-carry-on/275014/">the link</a> and peruse the whole thing -- don't worry, it's not very long -- but here are the highlights:<br /><div class="article-content"><blockquote><div><i><br />Terrorism, even the terrorism of radical Islamists and right-wing extremists and lone actors all put together, is not an "<a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66186/john-mueller-and-mark-g-stewart/hardly-existential">existential threat</a>"
 against our nation. Even the events of 9/11, as horrific as they were, 
didn't do existential damage to our nation. Our society is more robust 
than it might seem from watching the news.  We need to start acting that
 way.&nbsp;</i></div><div><i><br /></i></div><div><i>There are <a href="http://www.schneier.com/essay-315.html">things we can do</a> to make us safer, mostly around <a href="http://www.schneier.com/essay-292.html">investigation, intelligence, and emergency response</a>, but we will never be 100-percent safe from terrorism; we need to accept that.&nbsp;
</i></div><div><i><br /></i></div><div><i>How well this attack succeeds depends much 
less on what happened in Boston than by our reactions in the coming 
weeks and months.  Terrorism isn't primarily a crime against people or 
property. It's a crime against our minds, using the deaths of innocents 
and destruction of property as accomplices.  When we react from fear, 
when we change our laws and policies to make our country less open, the 
terrorists succeed, even if their attacks fail. But when we refuse to be
 terrorized, when we're indomitable in the face of terror, the 
terrorists fail, even if their attacks succeed.&nbsp;</i></div><div><i><br /></i></div><div><i>Don't
 glorify the terrorists and their actions by calling this part of a "war
 on terror."  Wars involve two legitimate sides.  There's only one 
legitimate side here; those on the other are criminals.  They should be 
found, arrested, and punished.  But we need to be vigilant not to weaken
 the very freedoms and liberties that make this country great, 
meanwhile, just because we're scared.&nbsp;</i></div></blockquote></div>In other words, as tiresome and cliche'd as the expression has become in the past few years, keep calm and carry on. It's what I wish we'd collectively done 12 years ago instead of what we <i>did </i>do (the PATRIOT Act, the Iraq War, Gitmo, torture). It's what we seem to be doing now. I hope I'm right... <br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Boston</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://jasonbennion.com/2013/04/boston.html" />
    <id>tag:jasonbennion.com,2013://4.3077</id>

    <published>2013-04-16T20:12:58Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-16T22:25:48Z</updated>

    <summary>My first thoughts were of my old friend Andy and his wife Krickett. I met both of them during my Cinemark days, when I was working at that multiplex movie theater I reminisce about all the time. Andy was an...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Bennion</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonbennion.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="bostonmarathon" label="Boston Marathon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cinemark" label="Cinemark" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="multiplex" label="multiplex" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nostalgia" label="nostalgia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="pattonoswalt" label="Patton Oswalt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="politics" label="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="terrorism" label="terrorism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jasonbennion.com/">
        <![CDATA[My first thoughts were of my old friend Andy and his wife Krickett. I met both of them during my Cinemark days, when I was working at that multiplex movie theater I reminisce about all the time. Andy was an usher, a skinny kid with hair so meticulously combed and gelled that we used to tease him about being an android (or, as the android character Bishop in <i>Aliens </i>dubs himself, an "artificial person"), because no natural human could possibly have had such perfect hair. Krickett was a candy girl. I imagine they probably call them "concessionists" or some other politely neutral term these days, and I've noticed there's no longer a gender-based distinction in theater jobs as there was in my day, when boys were ushers and girls were behind the counter. But just keep in mind that my day was the Pleistocene, and all the way back then, in the dim mists of pre-history, we had <i>candy girls</i>. Anyway, Krickett was cute and vivacious and kinda-sorta resembled Julia Roberts, back when the whole world had a crush on Julia Roberts. She and Andy were almost immediately besotted with each other. <i>Hopelessly </i>besotted. They were also very young, just 16 I think, and being a wise old jaded cynic at the age of twentysomething, I honestly didn't think they were going to last. <br /><br />I lost track of Andy and Krickett for a long time after I finally left the projection booth for good, but of course I eventually came across the two of them on Facebook, as you inevitably do in the 21st century, and I was pleased to learn I'd been wrong about them. It turned out their teenage romance had had a happy ending after all. They got married, had some kids, and are still together and still happy after two decades. As it happens, Andy has become a long-distance runner in that time and -- I'm sure you can see where this is going -- he was in the Boston Marathon yesterday, fulfilling one of his "bucket list" goals. On his wife's birthday, no less. So when news of the explosions came flashing across the InterWebs, my immediate reaction was to hope the two of them were safe.<br /><br />They were, thankfully. Andy checked in with me later in the afternoon and reported that he had already completed the race and they were both back at their hotel when the bombs went off. I felt a surprising amount of relief, considering I haven't actually seen either of them in the flesh since <i>Jurassic Park</i> was in theaters the first time. <br /><br />I'm also relieved to see that, so far anyway, the country doesn't seem to be going bananas over this. The Marathon bombings were an obvious act of terrorism, and in the minds of many people, that means Muslims. I read this morning that every major Muslim group in America has already issued press releases condemning the attack, essentially trying to pre-empt the hysteria that inevitably gets directed their way following a terrorist attack. It depresses me that these groups feel it necessary to do this, but I understand why they do. Personally, I think it's just as likely what happened in Boston yesterday was perpetrated by some self-proclaimed "patriot," a white, Christian, anti-government, Timothy McVeigh-type protesting against income taxes or something. (It strikes me as significant that yesterday was April 15, tax deadline day.) Or it could have been a nondescript nutbag with no particular cause at all, other than to hurt some people and create mayhem. We just don't know yet. But regardless of who the eventual suspect(s) turn(s) out to be, it gladdens me that I'm not encountering a lot of paranoid, xenophobic, reactionary chatter online. In fact, other than pro bloggers and news sites, I'm not seeing a lot of chatter about the bombings at all. People are tweeting and blogging and Facebooking about the same old stuff... movies and hobbies and jobs and family, what they had for lunch and what funny things are happening to them. Normal life. Could it be that finally, twelve years after everything changed on 9/11, we're <i>finally </i>beginning to heed the wisdom of that old slogan, "Keep calm and carry on?" Maybe so. (Of course, there could be <i>lots </i>of chatter happening that I'm not seeing due to what I personally choose to follow online. I prefer to think otherwise, though.)<br /><br />I don't have much else to say about this whole terrible event. What is there to say, really? Any remaining sentiments of mine were already better expressed by the comedian Patton Oswalt anyhow. The comments he <a href="https://www.facebook.com/pattonoswalt/posts/10151440800582655">posted</a> on Facebook yesterday have already been disseminated far and wide, but they're so eloquent, so on-target, that I'm going to repeat them here as well, just in case somebody reading this hasn't seen them yet:<br /><br /><blockquote><i>Boston. Fucking horrible.<br /><br />I remember, when 9/11 went down, my reaction was, "Well, I've had it with humanity."<br /><br />But I was wrong. I don't know what's going to be revealed to be behind all of this mayhem. One human insect or a poisonous mass of broken sociopaths.<br /><br />But here's what I DO know. If it's one person or a HUNDRED people, that number is not even a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent of the population on this planet. You watch the videos of the carnage and there are people running TOWARDS the destruction to help out. (Thanks FAKE Gallery founder and owner Paul Kozlowski for pointing this out to me). This is a giant planet and we're lucky to live on it but there are prices and penalties incurred for the daily miracle of existence. One of them is, every once in awhile, the wiring of a tiny sliver of the species gets snarled and they're pointed towards darkness.<br /><br />But the vast majority stands against that darkness and, like white blood cells attacking a virus, they dilute and weaken and eventually wash away the evil doers and, more importantly, the damage they wreak. This is beyond religion or creed or nation. We would not be here if humanity were inherently evil. We'd have eaten ourselves alive long ago.<br /><br />So when you spot violence, or bigotry, or intolerance or fear or just garden-variety misogyny, hatred or ignorance, just look it in the eye and think, "The good outnumber you, and we always will."</i><br /></blockquote>Amen, brother.<br /><blockquote> </blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
