« July 2007 | Main | September 2007 »

August 29, 2007

Coming to the Defense of Classic Galactica

Speaking of remakes, I've run across a potentially interesting LiveJournal that, aside from one entry on the new Flash Gordon series, seems to be predicated around a defense of the original Battlestar Galactica and a denunciation of the "reimagined" version that's attracted so much love the last couple years. So far, Countess Baltar (as the LJ author is calling herself) hasn't made an argument in her own words, preferring instead to let carefully selected quotations from Ron Moore, Glen Larson, and various literary critics make her points for her. It's an interesting approach, although I would like to hear more from the Countess herself as to what, specifically, she dislikes about the remake.

Despite giving the new series a grudging thumbs-up after seeing a few episodes, I have to admit that I've never warmed to it, and indeed I've never watched more than just those first few installments. I can't deny that the series appeared to be well-made and intelligent, but it simply didn't appeal to me. It wasn't my Battlestar, and those weren't my Apollo, Starbuck, and Adama. The reimagined versions of those characters may have shared the same names as characters played by Richard Hatch, Dirk Benedict, and Lorne Greene -- well, sort of, since these exotic monikers have been turned into "call signs" in the new show, rather than actual names -- but there was very little else about them I found familiar.

Whatever Countess Baltar's specific gripes -- and I look forward to finding out more about those -- I certainly echo her concise statement of opinion in the "about me" sidebar:

Battlestar Galactica (1978)?:
Yes

Battlestar Galactica (2003)?:
No

Starbuck (male)?:
Yes

Starbuck (female)?:
No

Baltar, Count?:
Yes

Baltar, Gaius?:
Hell, no!

Remake Round-up

Genre fans like myself have done a lot of groaning in recent days over the news that Hollywood -- which lately seems to be more interested in leveraging recognizable brands (i.e., churning out new versions of properties whose names are already familiar to movie-goers) than in filming original screenplays -- is forging ahead with a remake of Escape from New York and that Keanu will be playing Klaatu in a new version of The Day the Earth Stood Still. (Actually, he'll probably be just fine in that role; he even has a passing resemblance to Michael Rennie. It's just the principle of remaking an undisputed classic like Day that bothers me.) So it came as a pleasant surprise to read about an interview with the eternally awesome Bruce Campbell in which the Brucester puts to rest a number of rumors that have been causing me some concern:

  • Campbell will not be reprising his role as Old Elvis/Sebastian Haff in a sequel to the charmingly goofy Bubba Ho-Tep. (The sequel -- supposed to be called Bubba Nosferatu -- may still go ahead without him, but I don't see how anyone could hope to fill those porkchop sideburns the way Bruce did.)
  • There will be no lame-ass mash-up of Freddy (A Nightmare on Elm Street), Jason (the Friday the 13th series), and Bruce's signature character Ash (The Evil Dead trilogy).
  • There will not be an Evil Dead 4. (Really, what could possibly be left to do after the utter silliness of Army of Darkness?)
  • And finally -- saving the best for last -- there will be no remake of the original Evil Dead starring Ashton Kutcher as Ash. Said Campbell: "The feedback from the fans was 90 percent negative. It's going nowhere."

It's nice to hear that, occasionally, rarely, common sense prevails...

August 26, 2007

Perspective: Downsizing the Bennion Archives

The sharp-eyed among you may have noticed that one of the descriptors I assign myself up there at the top of this page is "pack rat." As long as I can remember, I've had an almost existential dread of throwing away anything that might later prove to have some sentimental or historical value. That's why I still have a comic book my dad bought for me when I was six years old.

In addition to this natural tendency toward hoarding, I also picked up a collecting hobby in college. Tracking down, acquiring, and owning all manner of pop-culture memorabilia has proven to be immensely gratifying, for a number of reasons. But there's a big downside to being a collector, and that's the difficulty of storing and protecting all your possessions. This point was driven home rather forcefully a little over a year ago, when I experienced an event I like to think of as The Great Water-Filter Containment Failure and Basement Flood of 2006. Briefly, if you don't recall and/or don't want to follow the link, my water filter developed a major leak in the middle of the night, and by the time I woke up and noticed it, I had several inches of water throughout the entire basement. This would've been disastrous enough if the only possessions down there were my own, but I was also storing a lot of stuff my parents left behind when they built their new house. And most of that was sitting in stacks and heaps right there on the floor, right in the water.

My parents and I lost a lot of belongings that day. I can honestly say without exaggeration, that the flood was one of the most traumatic events of my life, at least in recent years. But in a way it was also a good thing. It was a tipping point that finally started the three of us on the long-procrastinated job of getting rid of our respective junk and organizing whatever was left over. My folks also stepped up their efforts to move the last of their things out to the new house. And, for me personally, the flood provided a much-needed dose of perspective.

I realized, you see, that it wasn't the collectibles I was most worried about saving from the waters that day. The action figures still in their original packaging, the Franklin Mint art plates and trading cards and first-issue comics with the foil-variant covers -- none of that stuff even crossed my mind. What really made me feel sick to my stomach was the possibility that I might have lost the letters from my first love, or my high school yearbooks, or the Miami Vice poster that hung in my bedroom when I was fifteen, or that tattered old copy of Marvel Team-Up #41 that my dad brought home from the drugstore one day when I was six.

I've thought a lot about that realization in the months since the flood, as well as the fantasies I used to have about what I was ultimately going to do with my collections someday. I used to think it'd be neat to have my own personal version of uber-fan Forrest J. Ackerman's famous Ackermansion, a residence-cum-museum stuffed to the rafters with every imaginable piece of memorabilia and monuments to all the movies and events that he has deemed significant in his life. But you know what? I don't think I want that any more, at least not on that kind of scale.

I never thought I'd say this, but the time has come to let go of some of my stuff. There are many, many mementos and collectibles down in the basement that still mean too much to me to get rid of. But there are many more that I bought simply as investments, or because I was struck by a passing fancy, or just because I felt like going down to Toys R Us and spending a few bucks on something. And I don't see any logical reason to continue storing those things anymore. So over the next few weeks, I intend to post a lot of stuff up for sale on eBay and possibly craigslist. Hopefully, the majority of it will find a new home with somebody who will love it as much as I love the items I've decided to keep. But either way, it will be out of my basement.

The bidding is already open on the first handful of items, some wonderfully sculpted action figures depicting the classic Universal Studios Monsters -- i.e., The Creature from the Black Lagoon, Karloff's Frankenstein, Lon Chaney, Jr., as The Wolf Man, Claude Rains as The Invisible Man, etc. They're truly beautiful items, but after long consideration, I've decided that the classic movie monsters aren't my primary interest when it comes to collecting, so off they go to someone who is more of a monster buff. If you'd like to have a look at them -- and I hope everyone reading this will at least go have a look -- you can click on the "Bennion's eBay auctions" link over there in the sidebar, or click here to take the direct approach. I'll announce here when I put up fresh batches of stuff. Keep checking, because you just might see something you can't live without!

August 24, 2007

Don't Mind Me...

Bad-ass me in the spring of '87

Just scanning a couple of old photos for my upcoming high school reunion, and thought I'd share one that I've always particularly liked. Real tough guy, wasn't I? For the record, that's my first car I'm sitting on, a 1970 Thunderbird that was about the same size as the Starship Enterprise. Well, maybe not that big... maybe the size of the Reliant. Either way, I wish I still had it. And yes, I am wearing a ZZ Top muscle shirt. Hey, give me a break; it was the Awesome '80s, after all...

August 23, 2007

Now We Know Where Starfleet Got Its Inspiration...

So, this afternoon, I've been rummaging through a folder of random crap that I've been meaning to blog about, looking to see if any of it still interests me, and I ran across the following image:

From high fashion in 1967...

I ganked that picture from this site, which identifies the fancy red vest as "The Cosmoboy," a then-cutting-edge design from Pierre Cardin which was featured in the August 1967 issue of Cavalier magazine (which I believe was a nudie mag, ahem, gentleman's lifestyle periodical along the lines of Playboy).

Is it just me, or does that look really familiar? Maybe like... something from the 23rd Century?

...to movie costumes in 1994.

My mom has always told me that if you hold onto an article of clothing long enough, it will eventually come back into style. Guess she was right...

Somebody Was Seriously High When They Came Up with This One...

As best I can recall, my introduction to the medium of comic books came when I was six years old. I was home from school, sick in bed with a bad cold or the flu or something. My dad went to the local drugstore to get some medicine, and when he returned, he also had with him a little treat that he hoped would cheer me up, or at least distract me in between puking sessions: a pair of what he called "funnybooks." Which confused me, because they weren't funny. But that's beside the point. One was a collection of stories about Superman and his various friends, cousins, and pets. The other (which I found much more appealing, probably due to the semi-lurid cover art) was an issue of a series called Marvel Team-Up.

As the title suggests, the premise of this series was to combine two or more characters who wouldn't have ordinarily crossed paths in their own titles, and then send them off on an adventure together. In the issue my dad got for me -- which somehow is the only one of this series I've ever read -- the action was played straight. Apparently, however, not every issue was so serious:

Greatest team-up ever!

Spider-Man and the cast of Saturday Night Live? Wow, I've got to track that one down... that's got to be a hoot. Especially if you read it drunk, which is probably how it was written. Click the pic to go to the image source and a synopsis.

Incidentally, I understand that most issues of Marvel Team-Up were self-contained stories. Naturally, that lone issue my dad got me, the only one I've ever read -- which, to no one's surprise I'm sure, I still have -- was one of the rare two-parters. To this day, I have idea how Spidey manages to free the Scarlet Witch from Cotton Mather's foul mind-controlling cross-power...

August 21, 2007

Shadow's in Remission!

Shadow looks to the future in his stylish, post-chemo bandages.

The title line says it all: after nine weeks of chemotherapy, Shadow, the Bennion Family Dog, is cancer-free. His veterinarian checked several lymph nodes around his body today and found no sign of abnormalities. My parents' big gamble worked, and, needless to say, we're all breathing much easier tonight.

Moving forward, he will continue to receive chemo for several more weeks, just to be sure, but the vet assured my mom and dad that he's responded as well as any dog she's ever seen, and he's got several more years ahead of him. He passed through the whole ordeal with very few problems, aside from picking up a few pounds as a result of the prednisone that was used to shrink his swollen glands. (I suspect the vast amounts of ice cream my folks have been feeding him lately might've had something to do with it, too. Time for this border collie to go on a diet!)

My parents have been surprised and very, very humbled by the support they've received from their friends (and even a few people who aren't so friendly) in the local antique-car scene, and I myself would like to say thank you to everyone who took the time to leave a comment here on Simple Tricks or to e-mail me personally. Yes, Shadow is only a dog, but in our family, dogs are people, too, and your compassion has meant a great deal to me.

The pulp-fictional Shadow knew what evil lurks in the hearts of men; the Bennions know what good lies there as well...

August 20, 2007

Happy 30th to the Voyagers

Thirty years ago today, the Voyager 2 space probe was launched on a groundbreaking mission to explore the gas giants Jupiter and Saturn, followed a couple of weeks later by its twin, Voyager 1. (I never have heard why number two went first...) Like those amazingly durable Mars rovers that appear to have survived even a planetary-scale dust storm, the Voyagers have far outlived their designed lifespan of five years and continue to send back useful data from beyond the orbit of Pluto as they coast toward interstellar space. Lots of interesting information can be had in this article, including the facts that Voyager 1 is currently the most distant human-made object, with a one-way radio message taking 14 hours to reach it, and both craft are getting by on a mere 300 watts of electricity -- equal to the output of just a couple of standard three-way lightbulbs -- which is provided by tiny nuclear powerplants because they're too far away for solar power.

The Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which built and operates the Voyagers, has a website devoted to the ongoing mission, and from there you can download a retrospective about those famous "golden records" afixed to the sides of the two spacecraft -- you know, the "message in a bottle" that invites the alien to Earth so he can become Jeff Bridges and have sex with Karen Allen in Starman...

Which Tarot Card Am I?

Via Jaquandor, I found this weird Internet quiz that tells you which tarot card best represents you. I have little interest in tarot myself -- fortune-telling, ouija boards, and all that "occult" stuff that generated so much hysteria in these parts back in my high-school days have always struck me as eye-rollingly silly -- but I'm always up for a time-wasting Internet quiz-thing. So, here we go:

You are The Devil

Materiality. Material Force. Material temptation; sometimes obsession

The Devil is often a great card for business success; hard work and ambition.

Perhaps the most misunderstood of all the major arcana, the Devil is not really "Satan" at all, but Pan the half-goat nature god and/or Dionysius. These are gods of pleasure and abandon, of wild behavior and unbridled desires. This is a card about ambitions; it is also synonymous with temptation and addiction. On the flip side, however, the card can be a warning to someone who is too restrained, someone who never allows themselves to get passionate or messy or wild - or ambitious. This, too, is a form of enslavement. As a person, the Devil can stand for a man of money or erotic power, aggressive, controlling, or just persuasive. This is not to say a bad man, but certainly a powerful man who is hard to resist. The important thing is to remember that any chain is freely worn. In most cases, you are enslaved only because you allow it.

What Tarot Card are You?
Take the Test to Find Out.


I'm sure this result would come as to no surprise to the parents of several young ladies I used to date...

Fall Must Be Coming...

How do I know that the season is changing?

Well, for one thing, the temperature when I left the house this morning was delightfully cool, somewhere in the upper 60s, the first time it's been that low in several months and a welcome change for this curmudgeonly blogger, who has found this year's record-setting string of 100-plus days to be just about unbearable.

But the real tip-off was the legion of cute young co-eds commuting up to the U of U this morning for their first day of classes... which, of course, goes hand-in-hand with the Utah Transit Authority's asinine annual ritual of shortening their light-rail trains just when a reasonable person would expect that they'd need more capacity. All summer long, the trains have been running with four cars and were mostly empty. Now, this morning, with all these new faces waiting on the platform, there were just two cars, and we ended up wedged in like cattle.

Morons.

August 18, 2007

Random 'Net Crap on a Saturday Afternoon

Well, I've been been accomplishing nothing fast on this lovely Saturday afternoon. The Girlfriend is spending the weekend at her parents' place out in Tooele and I was planning to take care of all kinds of mundane jobs around the Compound that I keep putting off, but instead I've spent much of the day puttering around my office, surfing the web, IM'ing with some buddies, and listening to Pandora.com. (That's been a strange journey today. The algorithms that supposedly determine your tastes started me off with Natalie Imbruglia's "Torn"; now, three hours later, I'm listening to Ozzy Osbourne. That either says something about me, or about Pandora, and I haven't been able to decide which...)

You know what, though? I'm okay with not having done anything noteworthy today. It's felt damn good to just screw around, actually. I've been something of a stress-kitten lately, and I've been suffering for it (briefly, I carry my tension in my back and I also tend to sleep in awkward positions, and those two variables reached critical mass about a week ago and left me with a kinked neck that I couldn't turn to the left without yelping in pain). Well, I just realized that nothing hurts at the moment, for the first time in days. It's luxurious, and it goes a long way toward assuaging my conscience.

And if that's not enough, I've found some amusing stuff out there today, which I will share with you below the fold:

First up, a photo from The Dark Knight, the upcoming sequel to Batman Begins:

Full disclosure: I liked Batman Begins, but I didn't love it. I thought it was probably the most realistic version Batman flick we're ever likely to get, but upon reflection, I'm not sure I want a realistic take on this character. I never once felt the goose-pimply sensation I got from Tim Burton's over-the-top gothic weirdness in the '89 Batman. But I know I'm probably in the minority on that.

My stubborn preference for outdated pop culture aside, however, I think that's a way-cool photo up there, very moody. It kind of looks like Salt Lake, actually, which amuses me to no end. For the record, I am looking forward to seeing The Dark Knight, if for no other reason then to see what Heath Ledger does to make us forget Jack Nicholson's Joker. There's an entire gallery of TDK shots here.

Moving along, here's a picture of one of "Ripley's bad guys" depicted with vegetables:

Actually, to be more precise, it's an Alien depicted with 3D digital models of vegetables. The way some people occupy their time! Details here.

On a more serious, literary note, science fiction author Elizabeth Moon has something to say to the literary snobs who reject commercial fiction out of hand:

Literary snobbism doesn't actually hurt those of us who are its targets...who write books people want to read, rather than have to read in a class. ...What literary snobbism does hurt is the public--people who are taken in by the ignorant assertions of "experts" who don't even read what they claim to despise (or read it so carelessly that they might as well be reading a cereal box.) It hurts the students who think their natural taste for plots that are plots and characters who are interesting is the literary equivalent of original sin and must be excised before they're fit to be called educated.

Anyone who thinks there's no "complexity, depth, and originality" in commercial fiction needs an education. Anyone who thinks mysteries (or any other genre) are all "trashy" needs an education. (Start with Aristotle, whose _Poetics_ lay out the criteria. Continue through centuries of fiction that worked, up to the present day, being sure to take in multiple genres in each era.)

Literary and/or cinematic snobbery is a windmill I've been tilting at since I was a senior in high school and had an AP English teacher tell me that no science fiction was worth considering in an academic manner. I rebelliously wrote a paper on the classics of the genre, earned an A, and later found out that this teacher had used my paper as an example of good writing for subsequent classes. Just to toot my own horn a little.

And finally, here's another video clip. A chain of random hyperlinking events brought me to this, which is the opening credits of an old Saturday-morning cartoon that I very vaguely recall. Apparently, I was a Rick Springfield fan much earlier than I realized:

Video Tours of Crossroads and ZCMI Center

In hunting around YouTube for videos of this morning's implosion, I found a few clips that may be of interest to sentimental slobs such as myself who want to reminisce about the downtown malls. The first is an appropriately titled "last look" that's heavy on schmaltz (warning: Barbera Streisand's "Memories" ahead!) and includes a little too much footage of the parking garages for my tastes, but also nicely encapsulates what's going away in the name of progress:

I haven't mentioned The Inn at Temple Square, which also appears in the above clip. That was one of those buildings we should've fought harder for, an elegant little 1930s-vintage hotel that stood at the corner of West Temple and South Temple, right across from Temple Square, and was very popular with newlyweds. It was the first part of the Crossroads Block to come down when this whole redevelopment project began. I never set foot in the place, to my regret...

Moving on, here's a tourist video that was taken nine years ago, showing the malls in their heyday (well, maybe not their heyday, which was probably in the '80s, but at least when they were still bustling and viable). This one includes lots of footage of that Crossroads atrium I was talking about in the previous entry, as well as a glimpse of the days when Main Street ran all the way north past the Temple instead of terminating in the LDS Church's controversial "little bit of Paris" plaza:

And finally, somebody's video of the Crossroads atrium area coming down:

Key Bank Tower Implosion: The End of Crossroads

At a little after 6.30 this morning, the Key Bank Tower, a 30-year-old high-rise office building in downtown Salt Lake, was imploded to make way for the new City Creek Center redevelopment project. It was the first such implosion in the downtown area since the old Hotel Newhouse was demolished back in '83 (which I didn't care about at the time, but in retrospect seems a deep shame, especially since the place where the hotel stood is now -- can you guess? -- a parking lot! Moreover, a parking lot that is rarely anywhere near capacity! That was really worth taking out a historically interesting and beautiful building, wasn't it?)

I haven't been able to find an embeddable video of the Key Bank's death to post up here, but if you go to KSL-TV's site, there are several nifty clips for your viewing pleasure. I especially like Angle #1, which has a couple of men in the foreground to provide some scale and drama, and Angle #4, which is a long-distance shot that includes the First Security Building I wrote about a while back. (Look for the red glow; that would be the big neon sign I like so well.) With the Key Bank's destruction, the so-called Crossroads Block -- named for the mall that used to wrap around the base of the tower -- is now clear. Meanwhile, across the street, the demolition of the ZCMI Center Mall continues. (Yes, you out-of-towners, Salt Lake used to have two malls right across the street from each other; it actually wasn't as insane as it sounds, as they had a different mix of retailers and catered to different demographics. As with so many other things about Salt Lake culture, it's a little complicated and it reflects the social schism between Mormons and non-Mormons...)

I don't mourn the loss of the Key Bank Tower -- it was just a big white box, with no distinguishing features and no particular history to commend it -- but I am somewhat saddened by the razing of the mall. It was an ugly building, too, at least from the outside, basically just a block-long stretch of blank wall aside from some small window displays for Nordstroms and the grafted-on facade of a historical building I'm not familiar with.

(Side note: One of the weirder phenomena in these parts consists of putting a historic facade on the front of the modern building that replaced the old structure. For example, the fronts of the Promised Valley Playhouse and the Brooks Arcade are now attached to a parking garage and a mixed-use office-condo building, respectively. The whole concept strikes me as bizarre, like Buffalo Bill in The Silence of the Lambs, wearing the skins of his dead victims. Can any out-of-town readers tell me if other cities do this sort, or is it just a Salt Lake thing?)

I always liked the interior of Crossroads, though. The layout consisted of several different wings that all converged on a central atrium that stood five or six stories high. The ceilings in the wings always seemed low to me, although that may have just been a trick of perspective, and I recall that it was very dramatic to emerge from one of these dimly lit wings into the bright sunshine falling through the skylight that capped the atrium. I used to like to stand at the top of the atrium and look down past the criss-crossing escalators to the fountains in the basement food court far below.

As a teenager who lived in the then-rural south end of the Salt Lake Valley, Crossroads was a cosmopolitan destination, an exciting place filled with people and cool shops that we didn't have out my way. I rode the bus up there to see movies at the Crossroads Cinema before I got my driver's license, back when I was just starting to stretch my wings and explore the world beyond the five or six miles I'd always known. And I did a lot of Christmas shopping in the late '80s and early '90s, when I was a college student attending the U of U just up the hill from downtown.

In recent years, however, Crossroads had gotten pretty run down, its business stolen away by newer suburban malls and "lifestyle centers" out on the south end. And if the competition wasn't bad enough, the panhandlers and vagrants who congregated on the sidewalks outside scared away a lot of respectable citizens. The last time I set foot in Crossroads a couple of years ago, it was downright depressing, a warren of vacant storefronts and deserted corridors.

I think City Creek is going to an improvement, at least, I hope it will. It was time for Crossroads to come down, and I doubt I'll miss it the way I would one of the more distinctive (and older) downtown buildings. But I do have a lot of happy memories of the place, and as always, I do think it's too bad that things have to change...

August 17, 2007

Self-Evident Truths...

Well, duh...

Sometimes we need to be reminded of the startingly obvious. Click the image and go read the rest of the strip. Funny and wise, a rare combination...

My First CD(s)

As long as we're talking music, here's an interesting trivia note: the compact disc was introduced 25 years ago today. There's a pretty detailed article about its development here... although I notice it failed to mention that the preliminary work in converting analog music to a digital file was done by a grad student at my very own alma mater, the University of Utah. Granted, the actual physical disc technology was developed later, by other people, but the ground work for the digital music revolution was done right here in my back yard.

Anyhow, primitive tribal chest-thumping aside, my own experience with the CD has been pretty much like every other major new consumer technology that's come down the pike in my adult life: I became vaguely aware of this new tech long after its introduction and resisted getting involved because what I was using -- vinyl LPs and cassettes, in this case -- were perfectly fine for my purposes and I saw no need to "upgrade." The very suggestion that one would need to upgrade, that your possessions are not eternal, offended my nature. Eventually, however, after these new gadgets were nearing universal acceptance, I finally weakened and decided to hop on the bandwagon (which was about a mile down the road by that point), but only to the extent of buying new albums -- I wasn't going to be a damn fool and replace my whole existing collection with these new-fangled shiny silver platters because that would be simply... stupid. And now, of course, with everybody buying an iPod and some people claiming that the CD is on its way out, I'm just getting around to picking up CD copies of ZZ Top's Eliminator and The Traveling Wilburys' self-titled collection, two of the last cassettes from my old collection to be upgraded. Sigh... sometimes, I hate being so predictable...

To answer the question Scalzi posed earlier on his blog, my very first CD purchase was actually (and ironically, given all my talk today about rock and roll) a pair of soundtracks: Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade and the New American Orchestra's recording of music from Blade Runner (as opposed to the original recording by Vangelis, which was unavailable at that time -- 1989 -- because of some legal snafu). I'd heard great things about what these CD thingamabobs could do for instrumental music, especially if if that music had been recorded digitally, whatever that meant; Last Crusade was one of those digital recordings, and Blade Runner was... well, Blade Runner, so I had to pick those two up. And I'll admit, I was impressed. It was amazing, nay, miraculous, to hear music reproduced so cleanly, without any scratches, pops, or background rumble caused by my el cheapo phonograph. It was like music had been invented all over again.

Now, 25 years down the road, that clarity is the default and we're all debating over minutiae like whether the sound of cymbals gets clipped if you rip a track at too low a bit-rate -- you know, that sentence may as well have been in Swahili back in '89 -- and, while some lament that we're losing fidelity in the name of being able to carry our entire music library around in a shirt pocket, I find that I still miss the grubby, organic imperfections of vinyl. Never satisifed, are we?

Like a Boomerang, I Need a Repeat

So, if you weren't following along in the comments, the correct answer to yesterday's "pop quiz" -- i.e., what do the groups ZZ Top, The Pretenders, and The Stray Cats have in common? -- was provided by our esteemed webmaster Jack: those three bands all performed Wednesday night at West Valley City's Usana Amphitheater, and The Girlfriend and I were there for what seems to be turning into an annual tradition for us, namely, seeing one multiple-act, '80s-nostalgia outdoor concert per year. (Last year's entry in this category was Journey and Def Leppard, if you'll recall.)

I was pretty enthusiastic for this show, although it did strike me as a really strange line-up. When I first heard about it, the only thing I could think of that these bands had in common was that they all had hit songs in the year 1983. (That would be the three tunes whose videos I posted yesterday: "(She's) Sexy + 17" by The Stray Cats, "Back on the Chain Gang" by The Pretenders, and "Gimme All Your Lovin'" by ZZ Top.) The more I pondered it, though, the more I realized that it was actually brilliant programming; there was something for everyone! You had the good-time retro rockabilly of The Cats for the neo-swing hipster crowd; the punk-influenced "modern" sound of The Pretenders for the aging New Wavers-turned-suburbanites (easy to spot in their madras shorts and polo shirts); and down-and-dirty, bluesy Tex-Mex rock and roll of ZZ for the former (and current) mulletheads. Guess which category I fall into?

(A quick aside: back when ZZ Top was in the midst of their MTV glory, my best friends were a couple of guys named Chad Skinner and Kurt Stephensen. Somewhere in my high-school freshman yearbook, there is a photo of the band in their "Sharp Dressed Man" finery, and someone -- I think it was Kurt, but I no longer remember for sure -- wrote in our names beside each of the ZZ guys. Chad, being blond and a little more tailored in his appearance, was equated to Frank Beard, the band's drummer who, ironically enough, is the one member of the band who does not have a beard. Kurt and I were the two front men with the outlandish appearance that everyone thinks of when you mention the Little Ol' Trio from Texas.

Another quick aside, just to further embarrass myself by demonstrating the depths of my fanboy lameness: the three well-known ZZ videos that feature the Eliminator hot rod -- the aforementioned "Gimme All Your Lovin'", "Sharp Dressed Man," and "Legs" -- also prominently display a custom silver keychain in the shape of the band's double-Z logo. That keychain serves as a near-magical talisman for the young men in those videos, unlocking the guys' self-confidence and -- most importantly -- their ability to score. I myself picked up one of those keychains when I saw the band back in '86; it's been attached to the keys for my beloved old Ford Galaxie ever since. As to whether it ever had any impact on my ability to score, well, I'll leave that to your imagination.)

Remembering the traffic nightmare we encountered last year on the way to the Def Lep show (which, as you may recall, caused us to miss much of Journey's set), Anne and I tried a different route this time, driving way out to the Bacchus Highway on the far western edge of the valley so we could approach the amphitheater from the back side. It worked like a charm; unlike last year, we were able to park within a mile of the entrance and made it through the gates with plenty of time before the main show began.

The Cats took the stage first for a high-energy set of eight or nine songs that naturally included their three best-known hits: "Sexy + 17," "Stray Cat Strut," and "Rock This Town." I understand that this is the first time the original members of the band have toured together since the '80s; you'd never have known it, though, from the way they played off one another with the easy familiarity of old friends and the enthusiasm of men half their age. I went to this show to see the Top, but to be perfectly honest, I think The Cats put on the best performance of the evening. Anne, who was mostly interested in seeing this group, was not disappointed.

Next up was The Pretenders, a band that neither Anne nor I were too crazy about back in the day. Although they played very well, and Chrissie Hynde's voice still sounds exactly the way it did 25 years ago (she still looks pretty much the same, too, rail-thin despite having at least one child that I know of), their 40-minute performance Wednesday gave us no reason to re-evaluate our opinions. The Girlfriend and I both find their music boring, to be honest; it's just not our cuppa. And it didn't help when Hynde decided to climb up on her soap box and deliver a little harangue about animal rights, either. I suppose the fans of activist bands like The Pretenders or U2 find that sort of thing admirable and heroic, but it annoys the hell out of me. Look, I'm all for reforming our industrial farm industry, which I agree is genuinely disgusting, and for treating our animals humanely, but the truth is, I like wearing leather and eating meat, and every time some concerned rock star interrupts a show to preach at me -- whether it's about the joys of eating vegetables, or the need to help Africans pay off their debts (yes, Bono, you pretentious twerp, I'm talking to you) -- I find myself exponentially less interested in their cause than I was five minutes earlier. Chrissie Hynde's remarks did nothing more for my conscience than make me want to sink my teeth into a big greasy cheeseburger. Look, I get enough of politics on the InterWeb; I don't want it in my music, okay? At least they played "Brass in Pocket," which I've always thought was a nifty little song, despite not caring for the rest for the band's oeuvre.

Moving on to the evening's main attraction (at least for me), ZZ Top surprised me on several counts. For one thing, their playlist included a lot of their older, more blues-oriented songs from the pre-Elimantor days, including "Waiting for a Bus/Jesus Just Left Chicago," "Blue Jean Blues," "Just Got Paid," and even a blistering cover of the old Hendrix classic "Foxy Lady," all of which was fine by me but left some more casual-fan types in the audience (like my darling Girlfriend, for instance) visibly feeling a little lost. Also, their performance was curiously workmanlike -- not bad, not sloppy or disengaged, just not as spectacular as I remember them being in 1986. Maybe it's because they're getting older -- ZZ's been around for nearly 40 years now, as hard as that it to imagine, and the guys have got to be in the neighborhood of 60 -- or maybe it's because I'm older and not as wrapped up in the whole rock-and-roll experience as I used to be. The production design probably had something to do with it, too. Back in '86, when they were on the Afterburner tour and still solidly in their MTV phase, there were lasers and smoke and an elaborate stage set-up that included a giant King Tut head wearing wraparound shades (don't ask; that thing no doubt came from the same overheated zeitgeist that inspired Spinal Tap's Stonehenge set). This time around, there were projected light effects on a scrim behind them, and chaser lights on their mike stands, but that was about it. They did haul out those infamous furry guitars for "Legs," and bits of the three music videos that shot them to fame in the MTV days were shown on the scrim and amplifier stacks while they played the accompanying songs, but in general the special effects were pretty low-key.

The oddest thing, however, was they way they kept ending most of their songs. Granted, in the recorded versions, ZZ Top has veerrrry long fade-outs, but on Wednesday night it was like they were just saying to each other, "And we'll stop playing... NOW!" It was very disconcerting to be lost in the moment, singing or air-guitaring along, and all of a sudden get cut off. Musicus interruptus.

These nitpicks aside, however, ZZ showed us a good time, and the late-in-the-show triple-shot of their Eliminator-era hits followed by a rousing medley that began with "La Grange" and ended with "Tush" left everybody's heart pumping as the concert ended.

One final note: I was surprised and somewhat disheartened to see a lot of empty seats in the reserved section, and even the usually jam-packed lawn seating area was much less crowded than usual. I suspect there are two explanations for this. One is the cost. Tickets prices for this one seemed really high; Anne and I probably wouldn't have gone if not for a one-day promotional deal that enabled us to pick up tickets for about $12 a piece (talk about an '80s flashback!). The other problem, I believe, is that the promoters couldn't figure out how to advertise three bands so diverse in their sound. Which radio station do you even approach? I remember radio back in the '80s being much more diverse than it is now, and it wasn't unusual to hear The Stray Cats, The Pretenders, and ZZ Top all on the same station; these days, however, ZZ is confined to the classic rock station, The Pretenders have been classified as "modern music" (something of a misnomer, considering that what we used to call "modern" is now 20-30 years old), and The Cats... well, I don't know who plays them anymore. Maybe some cities have an '80s station; we don't here in Salt Lake. I don't know if there is a solution to either of these problems, but I hope somebody thinks of one before the next big nostalgia tour comes through...

August 15, 2007

Pop Quiz

Before we begin, yes, that title up there is indeed a play on words, a pun, as it were. Groan if you feel the need. I'll wait...

Finished with that? Good, now let's begin. Tell me -- if you can -- what do the following three items have in common?

I'll provide the answer sometime tomorrow, after I've gotten some sleep...

The Future: Pretty Much More of the Same

Via Boing Boing this morning, I found an interesting New Yorker essay by Adam Gopnik on the late science-fiction novelist Philip K. Dick. Dick has long held a certain amount of fame for writing the novel on which the movie Blade Runner was based, but in recent years he's also become increasingly respected by the Keepers of the Literary Standard, as evidenced by the anthology reprints of his much of his oeuvre in the '90s and the recently published Library of America omnibus edition of his most significant novels. As Gopnik says, "Of all American writers, none have got the genre-hack-to-hidden-genius treatment quite so fully as Philip K. Dick, the California-raised and based science-fiction writer who, beginning in the nineteen-fifties, wrote thirty-six speed-fuelled novels, went crazy in the early seventies, and died in 1982, only fifty-three."

Now, I must be honest, all I really know of Dick's work is some of the movies that have been based on it. I have read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, the novel that inspired Blade Runner, but I was very young at the time, and it confused the hell out of me. I remember being baffled that it didn't follow the movie more closely, and Dick's tendency to invent words caused me no end of frustration. I've always intended to give the book another try, but haven't gotten around to it yet.

In any event, Gopnik's essay -- which covers Dick's fascinating and tumultuous life, and also offers some insightful criticism of his work -- is a good read, and I recommend it to anyone who has even a passing interest in the subject. However, the point I really want to address with this entry actually turns on a single paragraph:

Although “Blade Runner,” with its rainy, ruined Los Angeles, got Dick’s antic tone wrong, making it too noirish and romantic, it got the central idea right: the future will be like the past, in the sense that, no matter how amazing or technologically advanced a society becomes, the basic human rhythm of petty malevolence, sordid moneygrubbing, and official violence, illuminated by occasional bursts of loyalty or desire or tenderness, will go on. Dick’s future worlds are rarely evil and oppressive, exactly; they are banal and a little sordid, run by a demoralized élite at the expense of a deluded population. No matter how mad life gets, it will first of all be life.

The future will be like the past. That so perfectly encapsulates something I've long thought, an idea that, to be honest, has caused my enjoyment of SF to diminish somewhat in recent years. I simply no longer have much faith in any vision of humanity's future that doesn't acknowledge how little we've actually changed, as a species, since Shakespeare's time. As much as I love Star Trek, for example, Gene Roddenberry's utopian vision of a future where human beings all work together for the betterment of the individual and the species, while inspiring and hopeful and greatly appealing to those with a certain romantic outlook, is also rather, well, silly. It assumes too much about the human potential to rise above our essentially selfish natures. It's not that I don't think we have this potential -- on the contrary, I think we exercise it every single day -- but I do think it's always checkmated by our potential to be royally shitty to each other. I have no doubt that human beings 300 years from now will still be the same rotten, selfish, pleasure-seeking, noble, generous, wonderful creatures we've always been, even if we are travelling at warp speed.

This thought -- that the future will basically be more of the same -- applies not just to human beings, but to our environments, as well. Part of why I like Blade Runner so much -- Dick saw it before his death and he liked it, too, incidentally -- is the fact that its production design includes so many old-looking buildings and deliberately retro styles mingled with the futuristic high-tech stuff. I love, for example, how you can see a hulking old '50s-vintage Cadillac in one of the street scenes, sitting in the midst of all the flying Spinners and future cars. Because that's how the world really works. Whether because of economics (people can't afford the latest and greatest) or matters of taste (some people just like old-fashioned styles), people retrofit old things and keep using them, long after more efficient or just plain newer things come along.

Along those lines, I love that Harry Dean Stanton wears a Hawaiian shirt in Alien, and that the shipboard dining room on Firefly is a jumble of mismatched, very 20th-century-looking furniture, centered around a big wooden table. Why wouldn't you have a wooden table on a spaceship? It's a humanizing element, a little bit of warmth in the middle of all that metal and plastic.

Turning to the real world, I think maybe part of the reason why there's so much "where's my jetpack"-type discussion these days is because, generally speaking, it doesn't feel like anything has changed over the last few decades. It has, of course, and in some pretty dramatic ways, but they don't look dramatic. My grandmother, for instance, was old enough to see the invention of air travel, telephones, radio, and television, not to mention the widespread adoption of the automobile. The world she left a few years ago looked extremely different from the one she entered nearly a century before. But for us younger people, the post-Baby Boom generations, things don't look that much different. The iPod is a very different technology from the Sony Walkman, but the form factor and the function -- portable music -- is about the same. Cell phones, while amazing from some perspectives, are still just telephones, a very familiar part of life. Flat-screen TVs are still basically just TVs. DVDs and even video-on-demand aren't the paradigm-changing innovations that video-cassettes were, because we're already used to the idea of watching movies at home. The "at home" part was the big change.

Granted, you never know what new inventions may be right around the corner, but it seems to me that while the specifics of what we're doing may change, the general categories of what we're doing remain the same. We're not living in domes and wearing tinfoil jumpsuits here in the real 21st Century, and I don't think it's realistic to imagine we will be anytime soon, if ever. If anything, the aesthetic trends these days strike me as deliberately old-fashioned; we're attempting to recreate the look of the past, albeit with some modern convenience built in. So maybe Blade Runner, with its 1940s stylings and noir-ish feel, wasn't that far off in its predictions after all.

And maybe, if that's how Philip K. Dick really saw things developing, I ought to give him another look after all.

More on the BHS Class of '87 Reunion

I received an e-mail this morning from Jeff Farr, the president of Bingham High's Class of 1987 and organizer of our upcoming 20-year reunion. Sounds like he could use some help!

I've forwarded his message on to all my former classmates for whom I had e-mail addresses, but maybe there are some more of you lurking silently here that I don't know about. If you're one of those, please read on, and then do what you can to spread the word...

Hello!

The reunion is near (25 days) and we need your help. We need FOUR things:

1. SPREAD THE WORD! We have almost 100 people RSVP and need more. Email everyone you know about the web site. The site is the only way you can RSVP, find out about details, and buy tickets.

The web site is: www.bingham87.myevent.com

If you haven't visited it yourself or RSVP be sure to check it out again. It's been updated too!

2. WE NEED ALL YOUR PICTURES AND VIDEOS! I need them to use as "filler" material on the four plasma screens throughout the night. Email anything you have to me. (If any of you have audio/visual experience we're looking for someone to put together a slide show/movie.)

3. WE NEED DONATED DOOR PRIZES! We plan to hand out raffel tickets at the door. Throughout the night we'll have drawings. If you or your company can contribute ANYTHING - let me know! Perhaps a gift certificate, movie tickets, spa, golf, restaurants, salons, anything you can get with your connections. Contact me with ideas of who I can contact if you can't.

4. BUY YOUR TICKETS - NOW! We're in a money crunch. I've paid almost $3,500 already and need to come up with another $3,000 in deposits in two weeks. To hold the Venue, pay for the food, the band - everyone requires payment up front before the event. Not to mention the money needed to buy supplies, decorations, keep the web site going, etc. If you're able, and are planning to go to the reunion, please go to the web site and buy your tickets now instead of at the door. This will help offset some of these deposit costs and give you a discount on the tickets. Of course if you'd simply like to donate to the class fund you can do that too.

If you know of anyone you can forward this message to - do it! NOW! Only 25 days left!

Contact me with any questions or comments.

Take Care!

Jeff

August 14, 2007

The Sad Saga of the Neighborhood Crazy Lady, Part Two

[Ed. note: Read the first part of this long story here.]

Fast-forward to just a couple years ago. Nearly three decades had passed since the Great Dirt-Pile Fracas. The Crazy Lady was now living alone after losing a second husband and seeing her kids move away -- far away, in a couple of cases. Both she and my father had mellowed somewhat, enough to speak to one another occasionally with some degree of civility, although both of them still tried to keep their distance. But even with such limited contact, it started becoming obvious that something strange was happening to The Crazy Lady. She was becoming... well, nice. Sickeningly sweet, in fact. If she saw my mother out in the front yard, she'd cross the street to complement her on her roses. If Dad was trying to repair that decrepit old whiteboard fence across the front of the pasture just well enough to get through one more summer, she'd come ask him if he wanted a cool drink.

This behavior was... unsettling. It was extremely out of character for her, and it put my parents on guard. They thought at first it must surely be some kind of Trojan horse gambit that would inevitably lead to another fight. But no, The Crazy Lady continued to be nice and no attack ever came. Someone -- Dad, perhaps, who has learned a great deal more compassion than he used to have -- suggested that maybe she was lonely, or that having her children all run as far away as they could get had taught her a lesson. All too soon, however, we started to see other symptoms. And we recognized them for what they were.

A few years earlier, we'd watched another elderly neighbor succumb to the creeping dissolution of Alzheimer's Disease, seen her personality change and ultimately crumble into dust before our horrified eyes, and now The Crazy Lady was acting the exact same way. Before long, she was obviously becoming unusually forgetful, and she seemed to be losing track of time, too. (Every time she spoke to me, for example, she asked how long it would be until I graduated from high school. Apparently, she didn't notice the gray in my beard.) And then she started coming to my father for help because she'd locked herself out of her house, and, oh, by the way, as long as he was over there, would he mind trying to figure out why her car wouldn't start? (That would be because she'd wrecked it years before, and it hadn't moved from her driveway since.)

She began bolting from the house if she noticed someone walking down the street, and pinning the poor slob down in a conversation about nothing. Most people, being basically decent and courteous, would try to talk with her for a while before gradually realizing that she wasn't quite all there and then struggling to politely extricate themselves and get away. It would've been funny if it weren't so sad.

Several times, she set out walking, headed for Utah County to the south, and was brought home by police officers who'd picked her up miles away from home. They explained to my father that, even though it was obvious her mind was impaired, they weren't empowered to take her to any kind of care facility. That was a decision for her children to make. And when Dad tracked them down and told them what was going on, they weren't yet prepared to make it.

I'm not proud to admit this, but I did what I could to avoid The Crazy Lady, just as I had when I was little. She made me incredibly nervous. Earlier this summer, she came across the street while I was doing some yardwork out in front and ended up "helping" me all afternoon. Her help consisted of gathering small twigs together and asking me every 90 seconds if I had a box to put them in.

My father, on the other hand, surprised me. He, too, cringed if he saw her crossing the street or if he was over at the pasture and realized he'd been detected, but he always greeted her -- the woman who had been his mortal enemy for years, the woman with whom he'd once stood nose-to-nose in front of a cop and shouted at the top of his lungs -- with a friendly smile. He'd follow her back to her house and help her inside and never let her know that he'd used a key given to him by her daughter to open the door. He always told her the door had just been stuck.

She's not The Crazy Lady anymore. She doesn't seem to have any memory of the feud, or all the screaming, or all the threats. She doesn't remember throwing garbage over our fence into the pasture, or having my dad throw it right back. She doesn't remember playing petty games with the irrigation water, or recall my dad turning her in to the city council as a nuisance because of the way her goats smelled. She's a different kind of Crazy Lady now, a sweetly confused old woman with skin tough and leathery from years of working under a hot sun, who believes my father's '56 Chevy Nomad is her first husband's station wagon and that I am a high-school senior with my whole life ahead of me. My parents and I have all had trouble wrapping our minds around this change of paradigm, but Dad has done the best with it, I think.

A couple of weeks ago, The Crazy Lady looked to be in especially bad shape. She was wearing the same clothes she'd had on for days, and she didn't appear to have bathed recently. Not long after, I noticed one of her children at the house, loading a La-Z-Boy recliner into the back of a minivan. I wondered at the time if the kids had finally made their decision, but I was preoccupied with my own business and didn't spend too much time thining about it. A few days later, Mom and Dad got a phone call from The Crazy Lady's oldest daughter, informing them that she'd been placed in a nursing home, and thanking them -- my dad, in particular -- for their patience and kindness over the past year or so.

I never would've have wished this fate on anyone, not even my father's mortal enemy, but it's hard to know how to feel about this development. I spent so many years fearing and disliking The Crazy Lady that it's hard to now see her as an object of pity. It's like the sudden deflation that came with learning that Darth Vader, the scariest creature in the galaxy, was just a crippled old man.

And there's something else, too... The Crazy Lady is the last of the neighbors from my childhood. To the north, Mac, the nice old town doctor's widow who lived next door to us, who knitted me Christmas stockings when I was little and who was the other victim of Alzheimer's I mentioned, has been gone for years; Mr. Stephensen, the grandfather of my old buddy Kurt and who claimed to have known Butch Cassidy as a boy, has been gone for years longer; and both of their houses were bulldozed a decade ago. To the south, Jack and Rae are both long dead, too.

I don't expect to ever see The Crazy Lady again, certainly not alive. And when she's gone, a big part of the town I knew growing up will go with her. There isn't much of that town left, these days...

The Sad Saga of the Neighborhood Crazy Lady, Part One

Once, when I was a kid, my father got into a years-long feud with one of our neighbors over -- I kid you not -- a pile of dirt.

The neighbor in question was a widow who lived across the street from us and had a reputation for being irrationally mean. My folks have told me many times how she used to chase her children around her front yard, beating them with a broom; obviously, this was in those bygone libertarian days before the government was empowered to send out its Welfaremobiles to collect unfortunate children. In any event, the grown-ups on my street did their best to avoid confrontations with her, and I -- who at some point had started thinking of her as "The Crazy Lady" -- avoided her altogether.

The Great Dirt-Pile Fracas actually began with a real-estate deal. There was an empty lot next door to The Crazy Lady's place, a lot which belonged, as best as I can recall, to one of her in-laws. The in-law had never done anything with the land, and The Crazy Lady had somehow, over the years, come to think of it as hers.

Then my father bought it, and all hell broke loose.

I remember Dad and The Crazy Lady having a number of minor opening skirmishes over the property, with her apparently thinking that if she just presented her case shrilly enough, my dad would have an eye-opening epiphany, truly see the cosmic injustice of it all, and, in a fit of compassion for a poor widow-woman trying to make her way all alone in the cold world, hand over the deed with no further questions asked.

Needless to say, he did not accept her logic.

Also, being a consummate diplomat who doesn't intimidate easily, he told her what she could do with her logic and her sob-stories. And then he forged ahead with his own plans to turn the lot into a pasture for my mom's horses.

There was a bit of a lull in the war while Dad built a nice whiteboard fence across the front of the lot, cleaned up the trash that had accumulated over the years, and installed an electric "hot wire" around the perimeter to keep the horses contained. He finished his improvements by using his tractor's grader attachment to level out the rutted, hillocky ground so the horses wouldn't stumble... including the front strip between the whiteboard fence and the road. Which is when The Crazy Lady's cherished pile of dirt comes into this tale.

This dirt-pile was nothing special. It wasn't good top soil or rich, black compost, or even anything that The Crazy Lady had purchased or had shipped in. It was simply a heap of swept-up dust composed of the same inhospitable clay that underlies the whole damn town. And it was on our side of the property line, or at least most of it was. So Dad graded it out flat. And the conflict went to DefCon One.

The next thing we knew, we had a furious woman with a murderous, lunatic gleam in her eye pounding on our front door and shaking her fist in my mother's face as she went off about how my father had no right to touch her possessions and she was going to see to it that he paid for his temerity and arrogance. Dad told The Crazy Lady to lower her hands, stop threatening his wife, and get the hell off his property before he carried her off himself. Crazy Lady told him what he could go do with himself, then stomped back across the street for home. Dad, now in a murderous rage of his own, followed her.

I could hear them shouting from inside our house. From across the street.

Someone called the police, and I imagine they came with some reluctance -- as I said, The Crazy Lady had a reputation, and they'd been to her house to break up spats between her and various neighbors before. In the end, the officer used the pencil that came with his service notebook to mark a line down the middle of the fencepost in the corner closest to her driveway. The Crazy Lady was told to stay on her side of that property line from now on, or the officer would come back and arrest her. My father was given the same warning. And at that, the shooting war became a cold war that stretched out over years, with the two superpowers of my neighborhood -- my father and The Crazy Lady -- exchanging dirty looks whenever they saw each other and playing childish games of throwing weeds and trash over the fenceline when they didn't...

To be continued...

Breaking News: Hell Has Just Frozen Over!

That obnoxious buzzing sound you hear? It's gotta be Satan's snowblower, because David Lee Roth is rejoining Van Halen for a concert tour.

(Naturally, the closest this tour is coming to my stupid little backwater is Glendale, Arizona. Sigh.)

The cynic in me gives Eddie and Diamond Dave maybe three performances before they're at each other's throats again and the whole enterprise is disintegrating under the weight of their respective egos. The romantic in me hopes that they somehow manage to hold it together, make a lot of money, and realize they could make even more money by adding additional performances to the roster... like, say, one in Salt Lake City. Hey, it's not so crazy... The Police Reunion Tour is still underway, isn't it? Of course, they passed over my hometown, too, the bastards...

Van Halen was never my favorite band, but they were pretty ubiquitous during my formative years ("Jump," "Panama," and "I'll Wait" are indelible tracks on the soundtrack of my life, and "Dance the Night Away" is simply a perfect little summertime parfait), and I just think it would be way cool to see Dave and Eddie on stage together, as they should be. Nothing against Sammy Hagar, whose stint with the band also generated a lot of good music, but David Lee, as big an ass as he appears to be, is the one true lead singer of this particular group, as far as I'm concerned. I won't travel to catch this tour, but if by some miracle they do add a Utah date, man, I'm so there...

August 13, 2007

Pathetic Earthlings...

Well, the Sci Fi Channel's new Flash Gordon series premiered over the weekend. I didn't see it myself -- I don't have cable, because I'm too cheap to pay a monthly fee for another hundred channels of The Same Old Crap™ just so I can catch the occasional novelty -- but from what I'm finding on the web this morning, I gather it wasn't good. One fellow is even calling for a "jihad against the Sci Fi Channel" before it can "reimagine" any other older properties. (Someone should've thought of that following the crappy Dune miniseries a few years ago -- arg! It still burns!)

I'm reserving final judgment on the show until I manage to see it for myself, but based on what I've been reading, I think it's pretty unlikely I'll approve of it any more than anyone I linked above. I can't say I'm surprised, given the Sci Fi Channel's spotty record and poor reputation among its target audience, but I am disappointed. While I tend to oppose remakes in general, I think Flash Gordon is a hero that can (and perhaps should) be revived and reinterpreted for each new generation, just as Batman and Superman have been revisited many times; as the premiere has inched closer, I've honestly been looking forward to a 21st Century take on what's been called "the original space adventure."

(I'm sure some of my loyal readers are probably crying "hypocrite!" right now because I rail all the time about remakes but I'm okay with a new Flash Gordon. Basically, he rationalized, it's because not all remakes are created equal. It's pretty much a given that most people aren't familiar with the decades-old, original source material for Flash, the Man of Steel, or the Caped Crusader; rather, it's the idea of these characters that is well-known. Which means you can justify trying to create a new interpretation of these characters every so often, because it's not a particular movie or radio show or serial being revisited, it's the idea. I think you can even make the argument that such interpretations don't even deserve the title "remake," at least not in the sense it's usually employed. They're more like fresh productions of time-honored stage plays. No one complains, for instance, that somebody is staging A Streetcar Named Desire with a new cast. They may say that Brando is the definitive -- or at least their preferred -- Stanley, but few people actually say a new production is a bad idea altogether, because it's not the Brando movie that's being revisited, it's the original Arthur Miller play. Same thing here: Flash Gordon is a comic-book character, even though few people remember that nowadays, and a new movie or TV series can be based on that comic rather than the earlier movie -- or other media -- adaptations.

Remakes of landmark movies and TV series are more problematic, because the imagery and actors associated with them tend to have such a strong presence in the public mind. The icons in these cases aren't so much the characters, like Flash Gordon or Batman, but the specific faces that have portrayed those characters. For example, I personally think this new Star Trek movie everyone is buzzing about, which will feature new actors playing young versions of Kirk, Spock, et. al., is a terrible idea, because Kirk has William Shatner's face, and Spock has Leonard Nimoy's voice, and that's all there is to it. But that's a rant for another time. The bottom line is, some remakes are easier for me to swallow than others, and if that makes me a hypocrite, then so be it, I suppose.)

In my opinion, the basic premise of Flash Gordon -- three companions tossed together by circumstance who set out on an impossible mission to save the world and get lost on an alien planet, fighting monsters and enemies of all descriptions, with an implacably evil despot at the heart of all their troubles -- is timeless. I've enjoyed Flash in all his various forms over the years, starting with the 1930s serials (which ran on one of my local TV stations when I was a kid) and continuing through the 1980 movie (yes, it's a bad movie, but it's entertainingly bad and has the virtue of looking and sounding like nothing else made before or since), the '80s-vintage cartoon, a number of paperback novels I've run across over the years, and, most recently, the original newspaper comic strips by Alex Raymond. Each new version has had its strengths and weaknesses, obviously, and I have my favorites among them -- the serial and the 1980 film have stayed with me over the years, the other variants, not so much -- but I'm not so attached to any one version that I would reject out of hand a new attempt at bringing Raymond's hero to life.

Ideally, I'd love to see a version that was as faithful to Raymond as possible, in terms of story and especially the look of his art. That means it would be a period piece set in the 1930s, with the same swashbuckling tone as Raiders of the Lost Ark -- i.e., it takes itself seriously but is not brooding, with enough humor and joie de vivre to say to the audience, "hey, this is fun, isn't it," but not so many yucks as to suggest that this thing is a big campy joke. Basically, I'd like to see the old serials -- which were surprisingly faithful, given the limitations of the time -- done with a decent budget and believable special effects.

I realize, of course, that my personal vision of a new Flash Gordon is probably unrealistic and wouldn't be of much interest to a wide audience. Nevertheless, I think a Flash project could be made that would pay tribute to all its predecessors, remain faithful to its roots, bring something new to an old tale, and remain fun and exciting. But from the sounds of it, that's not what the Sci Fi Channel has produced.

No doubt I'll have more to say after I get a look at the new show...

August 10, 2007

Another Sign We're Living in the Future

Perhaps the cheesiest episode ever of the old 70s-vintage Buck Rogers TV show -- which is saying a lot, considering how that entire series was one long block of yummy, yummy fromage -- was "Space Rockers," wherein evil Jerry Orbach wants to control the minds of the galaxy's youth via subliminal signals embedded in truly awful music. Actually, it probably wasn't such a bad idea for a story, at least not back then, when people still believed there were backmasked Satanic messages underlying "Stairway to Heaven." The way it was executed, however... oy. I thought it was embarrassing even when I was a kid and Buck was don't-miss-viewing.

Part of what made it so dippy was the appearance of the "rock" band Orbach was secretly using for his nefarious scheme. Leaving aside their cringe-inducing costumes -- which consisted of body stockings and rope lights -- their "playing" looked really, well, goofy. The series was set in the 25th Century, so everything had to be electronic and futuristic-looking, right? That meant that the "guitar" had no strings and Bonzo played his "drum kit" by tapping plastic rods with a pencil. But the most ridiculous item was the synthesizer/keyboard doohickey: it was just a table with colored circles on it, which was the musician "played" by passing his hands (or, in an over-the-top eruption of Velveeta, his leg) over them. Have a look at the video, if you dare.

Silly, right? Well, maybe not. Via Scalzi comes word of a new electronic musical instrument called the ReacTable, and I'll be damned if it isn't highly reminiscent of that old Buck Rogers prop:

Wired.com has an article about this new instrument here.

You know, if something from Buck Rogers had to developed out here in the real world, I think I'd have chosen those spandex jumpsuits that Erin Gray always wore. Maybe there's still hope for those...

August 9, 2007

The Compleat Doctor Who

This is kind of fun for people who are fully comfortable with the depths of their geekiness: it's a video compilation of the entire 36-year run of the original Doctor Who series (including the 1999 TV movie that aired on Fox) condensed into a little over five minutes.


(Via)

Fascinating to see how the visual tone of the series (not to mention the production values!) changes over the years...

The interesting thing (I think) about Who is that the show ran for so long and so many people have played the character (seven, in the series' original BBC run, followed by the guy in that Fox movie and now two -- soon to be three, I understand -- actors in the current revival series) that it's entirely possible for a person to consider themselves a big fan of the show without having ever seen a majority of the episodes. I certainly didn't recognize most of the stuff in that video, and I watched the show for years.

In a related phenomenon, it seems that Who fans tend to have "their" Doctor (i.e., they prefer one actor in the lead role over others), usually the first one they were exposed to, and they don't care much for the others. For instance, my experience with the series is largely centered around Tom Baker's stint as the character. I've seen most of the episodes featuring his predecessor, Jon Pertwee, and a few from his successor, Peter Davison, but very little or none of the work of the other four actors who worked on the original series. In fact, I know only one person who has seen them all, and I'm not sure if he has a favorite...

But I'm simply rambling. Watch the video. If you're any kind of Who fan, it should provoke a few pleasant memories. And if you're not a fan, well, prepare to be highly amused by monsters made of tinfoil, carpeting, and rice krispies. And no, I'm not kidding... those are actual materials used by Who's make-up and propmasters over the years...

Oh, one final, quick note about the music in this video: I'm not usually a fan of "mash-ups," i.e., two or more songs sampled and combined into something new, but I think the one here works really nicely. The relentless beat and '80s-vintage synthisizer of "Sweet Dreams" fits nicely with the bizarre, unearthly warble of the series' theme song. The Eurythmics and the Doctor Who theme... who'd have thought?

Bowing to a Master

You know, I like to think of myself as a pretty good writer, able to turn a decent phrase and evoke a mood when it suits me. But there are times when I run across something I wish I'd written, something that so perfectly crystallizes an idea, a moment in time, a cultural scene, that I can only doff my hat, hang my head, and think, "Damn, how does he do that?"

Case in point: John Scalzi's fever dream du jour:

I've mentioned before that there's a musician out there named Mike Scalzi (no relation) who is the leader of a band called Slough Feg, who play unreconstituted pre-hair band-era metal; really, you can taste the bong resin, see the black light Houses of the Holy poster and feel the conversion van plush carpet between your toes when you listen to these dudes.

[Listen to the latest Slough Feg album] and be transported to a land that time forgot: where Poison and Cinderella and Winger were all publicly executed for their crimes against humanity, where Vikings do roam the land, hoisting their mighty warhammers to battle the leather clad, GTO-driving survivors of the nuclear apocalypse, and where all the women look just like Julie Strain, and they're totally hot for you in your Music from "The Elder" t-shirt, and they've got a friend who looks like Little Queen-era Ann Wilson that they want to bring over to your garage loft for a special, special time. You know, before you all have to go out and kill some orcs. With your swords. That eat souls.

Good times, good times.

Good times indeed... and a good trick of exactly capturing the sticky zeitgeist shared by all early-teenage boys circa 1982 or so, back when our hormone-addled imaginations were fueled by endless reruns of John Carpenter movies on HBO, nascent music videos, Heavy Metal magazine, Robert E. Howard reprints, cheap pin-up posters won at state-fair midway games, and rounds of D&D played in our best friend's clammy basement bedroom, not to mention the occasional, furtive glimpse of our dad's Playboy stash and way, way too much sugar delivered by direct Slurpee infusion. God, I do miss those days, sometimes...

August 8, 2007

What a Geek Believes

Courtesy of Eric D. Snider, a former Utahn who now snarks at movies for a living in Portland, Oregon, comes a manifesto written by this guy, a radio DJ from the Pacific Northwest. With only a few minor tweaks, it could've just as easily been written by myself:

What a geek believes
According to Rick Emerson

I believe that Han shot first. I believe that Ally Sheedy was hotter before Molly Ringwald cleaned her up. I believe in miniatures, models, claymation, and not revealing the shark until you absolutely have to. I believe that George Lucas, for better or for worse, change[d] the way we see the world, each other, and ourselves. And I believe that we will someday reach those stars that he himself made visible. I believe that George Lucas is also a narrow-minded, money-grubbing, pig-headed slave to the now, who ought to be locked away from his own creations, lest he do them further harm. I believe that Jean-Luc Picard is the better Starship Captain, but I also believe that James Tiberius Kirk is infinitely cooler. I believe that a child standing in line to buy a book at midnight is fantastic; I believe that reading makes you smart — it’s schools that make you dumb. I believe that any episode of Futurama is better than any program featuring a precocious teenager who’s wise beyond their years. I also believe Buffy the Vampire Slayer to be the sole exception that proves this rule. I believe that comic books are an art form, and will someday be recognized as such. I believe that good shows die too young; and crap shows last too long. I believe that Eddie Izzard is the funniest man alive, and I don’t care whether you’ve ever heard of him or not — it’s still true. I believe that a girl who likes movies about zombies is hotter than whoever is on the cover of Maxim this month. I believe that Belloch ate that fly, I swear to God that I heard Luke call Leia “Carrie,” and I believe that Samwise Gamgee never quite got the credit he really deserved. I believe in magic, I believe in dreams, I believe in the power of music, movies, and the untold worlds inside an everyday library card. And I do not believe that geeks will inherit the earth; I believe that we already have.

So, did you catch all the references? If you're wondering about those tweaks I mentioned, they're after the fold:

  • I could go either way on the Ally Sheedy thing.

  • I'm not quite as harsh in my opinion of G. Lucas (I'd leave off the "money-grubbing," because I'm honestly not convinced he's motivated by cash flow at this point of his life/career; "pig-headed" certainly applies, though, and I also would like to see stewardship of the original trilogy given over to someone who genuinely understands and respects its place in film history).

  • I'm not as huge a fan of Eddie Izzard as this Rick guy, although I have heard of him and he is funny. Just not the funniest man alive. I'd give that award to any number of people, depending on my mood at the moment you asked. At the moment, I'd probably say Ron White. Or maybe John Cleese. How's that for two extremes?

  • Luke did not yell "Carrie!" as he's deplaning after the Death Star battle. How many times do we have to debunk that one?

Otherwise, I'm pretty much in agreement with all of this. Oh, I might also add "I believe that it's not Battlestar Galactica without daggits," but that would probably just start a fight I don't feel like having...

What's with the Shirts Pulled Over the Heads?

Oh, boy... remember what I said earlier about disgust, embarassment, and lingering regrets? What combination of those emotions do you suppose these guys are feeling now that their 20-year-old homemade music video for a goofy novelty song has hit the InterWebs?

Incidentally, the purveyors of "Pac-Man Fever," Buckner and Garcia, have a web site. I'm shocked to discover that you can still get their 1982 album of video-game-themed ditties; download it from the usual sources or order the CD here. (I'd recommend you order the tangible artifact, personally; I've dealt with CD Baby before, and it's a great company, an indie record shop in Oregon that'll send you some of the most deliciously eccentric e-mail you've ever read...)

(My thanks to Scalzi for bringing this to the world's attention.)

Reminder for the Miners

Just a little PSA for any fellow Bingham High School alumni who may be reading: the Class of '87 Twenty-Year Reunion is now only one month away. Details here.

I know many people, perhaps even most people, look back on their high school days with a mixture of disgust, embarassment, unforgotten hurts, and lingering regrets, assuming that they look back at them at all and haven't long since dealt with it all in therapy and moved on with their lives like normal, well-adjusted grown-ups. I, however, am a sentimentalist and a nostalgic (in case you haven't noticed), and the twisted, incredible truth is that I enjoyed my time in high school. Oh, I had my fair share of teenage angst and difficulties -- trouble with girls and bullies and self-confidence and all the other crap you see in cynical, darkly funny movies written by tragically ironic hipster types who smoke too much -- but I also had good friends (most of whom I still see or hear from occasionally) and a cool car, and I emerged from the '80s with a lot of fond memories.

All of which means that, even though I have yet to formally decide whether or not I'm going to my reunion, the odds are very, very good that I'll be there on September 8th. How about you?

August 7, 2007

Approved by the Imperial Tourism Board

Proving that tourism boosters will find a way to appeal to just about any niche or hobby group, here's a poster promoting Tunisia, the North African desert country that, as any good fanboy or 'girl should know, was the real-world stand-in for the planet Tatooine in the Star Wars films (not to mention several key scenes in Raiders of the Lost Ark):

According to this, these posters were being distributed at the Star Wars Celebration Europe convention last week. I'd love to have one for the Archives, and I wouldn't mind watching a sunset from the Hotel Sidi Driss, either. Guess those boosters know what they're doing after all...

[Update: Actually, a little bit of googling has turned up some trivia I didn't know, as shocking as that seems. The "double-sunset scene" in which Luke stands on the rim of the pit he and the Larses called home was actually shot at a place called Chott el Jerid, some distance away from the hotel that served as the interior locations of the Lars homestead.]

August 3, 2007

Happy Birthday, Anne

As you may have surmised from the title of this entry, today is The Girlfriend's birthday. Neither of us are all that keen on birthdays anymore, on account of having had a few too many of them for comfort, but, darling, I hope this will be a good one for you anyhow. I also hope you won't think your presents suck. You'll be receiving them in a few hours.

In the meantime, allow me to embarrass you with this classic image from your past:

Anne napping with a stuffed penguin.

When I think of you, baby, this is the image that often come to mind: you engaged in one of your favorite pastimes -- napping -- with a stuffed penguin...

August 2, 2007

Interview with Danica

Okay, last week I was obsessing over Flash Gordon, and now this week I keep going on about The Wonder Years. So I'm a fanboy, sue me. Well, no, on second thought, don't do that. I'll be nice...

If you're interested, Wired has just posted an interview with Danica McKellar about her new book and "why being a math whiz and a girly girl are not mutually exclusive." It's a pretty interesting read, and it even includes a link to McKellar's published proof, Percolation and Gibbs states multiplicity for ferromagnetic Ashkin–Teller models on Z2.

No, I don't know what that means. And neither do you, so stop trying to show off...

TV Title Sequences: The Wonder Years

I mentioned The Wonder Years yesterday, so it seems appropriate to make that show's opening our TV Title Sequence for this week. My research -- okay, the two minutes I spent perusing YouTube -- indicates that the 30-second version of the opening I've been seeing on those nightly re-runs on the Ion channel is actually cut down from the original sequence, which I had forgotten ran much longer when the show first aired. Here's the full-length, one-minute version as it appeared in the show's first four seasons, circa 1988-1991:


The style of this sequence -- the fake 8mm home movies and the unabashed nostalgic flavor -- has been copied, parodied, and outright mocked a great deal in the years since the show debuted, but I personally think it's brilliant. It perfectly captures the tone and setting of the show and introduces pretty much everything you need to know about the character dynamics -- e.g., Wayne's constant, mindless abuse of Kevin, the tentative feelings between Kevin and Winnie, the lovable goofiness of Paul, etc. -- all without any dialogue or voice-over whatsoever. The sequence was modified in later seasons, incorporating news photos and archival footage from the period, and using a different sampling of the Joe Cocker tune, but the revision wasn't nearly as effective, which is probably why it isn't as well remembered as this simple loop of a late-60s suburban summer afternoon.

Incidentally, I just thought of something somewhat-related that happened to me the summer I lived in Cambridge, England: I was punting with my friends along the river Cam, when we encountered another boat going the opposite direction. The puntsman in that boat caught sight of my shirt -- which sported the show's logo against a plain black background -- and called out, "Pardon me, where does one obtain a Wonder Years t-shirt?" I stammered something lame about a mail-order catalog back in the States and we continued along on our merry way, never to see each other again.

I've often thought in the years since then that I should've whipped the shirt off my back and offered to trade the guy for his snazzy boater hat...

August 1, 2007

It's Our Life, Man

Wil Wheaton on reports that Hollywood execs were using last week's Comic-Con as a focus group:

For those [Hollywood] executives [who almost always seem to screw up movie adaptations of the things fanboys love], I present a very brief, very simple primer in understanding geeks: We want this stuff to be done right because we’ve lived it for our entire lives and know it better than any of you ever will. We’ve played with the action figures and written the fan fiction and crammed fifteen of our friends into the hotel room so we could afford to go to the conventions where we buy T-shirts that say HAN SHOT FIRST because, goddammit, this stuff is our lives. Before we could talk to girls, there was Princess Leia. Before we had cars, there was the Batmobile. Before we could find escape from the horrors of modren life in a bottle, we escaped into the pages of comic books and science fiction magazines.

These stories that you buy and put on the big screen may just be numbers on a yearly accounting to you, but they are more than that to us. To us, they are something that brings us together and makes us part of an exclusive (and frequently stinky, unfortunately) club.

I concur. The whole essay is a passionate battle-cry that's worth reading if you've ever salivated at the thought of your favorite superhero coming to live-action life, only to be crushed when the movie turns out to be colossal dud like, well, 98% of the superhero movies that come out. Be warned, though -- Wil can get pretty potty-mouthed when he's worked up about something, and he's very worked up about the upcoming movie adaptation of Watchmen...

Drive-By Blogging 4: Return of the Blog

A few of the things that've grabbed my attention in the last couple days:

  • First, a non-linky event from Real Life: I got into a dispute with a pandhandler Monday because -- get this -- I gave him too much money. The bum in question was one of the Main Street Regulars, a tall, thin guy with pale blue eyes and a greasy ZZ Top beard. He's one of the friendlier homeless guys, who always has a cheerful "Morning, brother!" (or "sister," as may be appropriate) for anyone who makes eye contact with him. (The "brother" thing always make me think of Desmond on Lost, which could be why I find this particular vagabond non-threatening, because I like Desmond.) Anyway, yesterday "Desmond" asked me if I could spare 35 cents so he could get a Coke. I had a dollar in my pocket and a song in my heart, so I handed over the single, thinking I was giving the guy a great boon. Desmond didn't see it that way. He said he only needed 35 cents. He offered to get me change. I told him that wasn't necessary, he could have it all. He said a dollar was of no use to him, he only needed 35 cents. We went around in this circle two or three times before I finally decided we were having a major failure to communicate and said, "Keep it, man, I've got to get to work." I walked away. I felt his reproachful eyes all the way to the crosswalk. I'm still wondering what his problem was...

  • Moving on, the TV Squad has gotten an early look at the pilot episode of Sci-Fi's Flash Gordon re-do. Their verdict? Cautious optimism. However, the reviewer admits up front that he "went into this updated version of Flash Gordon with basically zero knowledge of the character and its many previous incarnations"; I, of course, will be judging the series with a significantly different set of parameters, so I don't find this reviewer's opinion very trustworthy. But your mileage may vary...

  • I've already been scooped on this next item (Jaquandor, Greenberg, and Wil Wheaton have all posted about it), but you never know who's reading what out there on this series of tubes, so I'm going to mention it, too: Danica McKellar, the woman who played young Winnie Cooper on The Wonder Years (one of my all-time favorite TV shows, incidentally), done grew up to be pretty dang smart (she's got a BS in Mathematics), and she wants today's young girls to follow in her footsteps instead of Paris Hilton's. She's written a book called Math Doesn't Suck, and she advises girls that "cute and dumb isn't as good as cute and smart." I couldn't agree more, Danica. Smart women are hot! Check out Danica's official web site for more information about her book, her recent acting jobs, and, of course, math. Not to mention more photos...

  • I'm a little late on this item as well, so you've probably already heard: famed European directors Ingmar Bergman and Michaelangelo Antonioni both died on Monday. While I respect them and their reputations enough to note their passing, I have to admit -- at risk of losing all credibility as any kind of serious film lover -- that I've never been a fan of either. Even at the height of my college-days film-school-snobbery, I just never got "art films." I could admire their visual beauty and technical creativity, but I never enjoyed them. Not, of course, that they were meant to be enjoyed, at least not in the same sense as a Thin Man comedy-mystery. But when you can describe movies, as Sean Means does in blogging about Antonioni as "slow, deliberate, oblique films with shots that lingered on his star's impassive faces," well, that's just not my bag, baby. I'd much rather see an example of Hollywood craftsmanship at its finest, Casablanca, say, or The Godfather, or even, yes, the original Star Wars. Hell, for that matter, I'd rather watch a Rober Corman B-movie or an old exploitation flick. My personal taste runs much more to movies than cinema.

    But then, there is something to be said for a film whose core image -- that of a man playing chess with Death himself in a desperate attempt to stave off the inevitable -- has become so deeply embedded in our cultural sub-conscious that even people who've never even heard of The Seventh Seal responded to a parody in Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey. For that simple pleasure, we really must thank Bergman...

  • There a web site out there called monsterbymail.com, which is exactly what it sounds like: you can commission an original work of art depicting the monster du jour (flesh-eating Romero-style zombies at the moment), which will then be mailed to you. You can even send the artist a photo of yourself, and he'll transmogrify you into an unspeakable thing. Which is exactly what one of my co-workers did for her husband as a birthday present. Here's a video of the poor guy getting zombified:

    Incidentally, I dig the music playing over the video; it's a song called "Drunk Tonight" By The Bloody Irish Boys.

  • And finally, an item from the local police blotter: Utah County's resident celebrity Gary Coleman was cited for disorderly conduct the other day. You may recall I had a near-encounter with Mr. Coleman myself a while back, and elected not to bother him. I'm thinking perhaps that was a wise decision...