« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

June 29, 2007

Am I a Nerd or a Geek?

Wired.com has a short interview with Patton Oswalt, who voices the lead rat in the new Pixar film, Ratatouille. Oswalt, whom you may recognize from the TV sitcom The King of Queens, is a self-proclaimed geek who is proud of the fact that his midlife crisis consists of taking up Dungeons and Dragons instead of buying a sports car. I like how he differentiates between nerds and geeks:

A lot of nerds aren't aware they're nerds. A geek has thrown his hands up to the universe and gone, "I speak Klingon — who am I fooling? You win! I'm just gonna openly like what I like." Geeks tend to be a little happier with themselves.

Based on his definition of the term, I think I've finally reached the geek stage. During the past ten years, it seems like I've been constantly debating non-geeks and even fellow fanboys over the things that matter to me -- for example, you can search this blog for my entries on Battlestar Galactica and read the comment-war I had with a detractor of the original series -- and I've finally reached the point where I'm sick of feeling like I have to defend the stuff I love. I love the crap that I love. I admit it, and I'm not so worried about trying to justify it anymore.

Patton is right: I feel much better now...

June 28, 2007

Transformers? Meh.

Am I the only thirtysomething fanboy type in the country who couldn't care less about the new Transformers movie opening tomorrow next week? Seriously, I can hardly hear my own typing over the sound of all that saliva pouring into keyboards all across the blogosphere. Wired.com has published no less than three articles and a photo gallery; Boing Boing has already posted a point-counterpoint review entry; and my good friend Steve is alternately doing the Snoopy dance over the concept of photo-realistic Autobots and fulminating against the fact that notorious crap-master Michael Bay directed the film.

Me, I just don't get the fuss. I watched the old cartoon show and found it entertaining enough, and I also think its way cool that Peter Cullen -- the voice actor who played heroic Optimus Prime on the old cartoon -- was asked to reprise the role for this new movie. But I never owned a Transformer toy, I never saw the 1986 animated Transformers movie, and the previews for this new version leave me absolutely cold. I guess I'm just a couple years too old for this particular pop-cultural touchstone to have affected me... and for some reason, that bothers me. I don't know why...

TV Title Sequences: Airwolf

Let's do another one, shall we?

As the decade of the '80s progressed, TV action heroes began to evolve from detectives into characters we can call, for lack of a better word, "troubleshooters." These guys were less concerned with figuring out whodunnit mysteries than with helping the downtrodden find justice. Like the private dicks they descended from, these characters were mavericks and renegades who operated outside the law, occasionally working for shadowy organizations whose exact nature was never disclosed, but just as often functioning as "indepedent contractors." The good-hearted mercenaries who composed The A-Team are one example of these troubleshooter characters; the world's ultimate tinkerer MacGyver is another. But the ones I really grooved on -- naturally -- were the ones that threw some science-fiction hardware into the mix. Knight Rider is probably the best known of these. Personally, I much preferred heavily armed, supersonic-capable, computerized stealth helicopters to silly talking cars:

I hear this theme music in my head everytime I see a helicopter, especially if it's just in the process of powering up and lifting off. Of course, the fact that our local AirMed choppers are the same Bell 222 model used to protray the Airwolf probably has something to do with that...

TV Title Sequences: Riptide

Today's title sequence is actually a suggestion sent along by Chenopup; it's the opening from another of those early '80s detective shows we all loved so much, a Stephen J. Cannell series called Riptide. I've got to be honest, I don't remember this one very well. I know I watched it, and I seem to recall that the three leads had all served together in Vietnam (not that there's anything unique about that; all the early-80s TV detectives were 'Nam vets). I believe at least one of them lived on the boat that gave the show its name, too, but I'm not sure and the Wikipedia entry for the show is unclear on this point. In any event, it's an enjoyable title sequence and another good Mike Post/Pete Carpenter theme song (although it loses a couple of points in my book for sounding so much like the Simon & Simon theme):

June 27, 2007

Book Review: Splinter of the Mind's Eye

So, all my blather a month ago about the early days of the Star Wars phenomenon put me in the mood to revisit a novel I've not read in probably, oh, 25 years or so: Splinter of the Mind's Eye by Alan Dean Foster.

Published in the spring of 1978 while the movie was still playing in many theaters around the country (it seems to me that it played at the Centre here in Salt Lake for well over a year; inconceivable these days when a movie's box-office take is pretty much complete after only two weeks!), Splinter was the very first Star Wars tie-in novel, not counting the novelization of the film itself. (Which, incidentally, was also written by Foster, even though G. Lucas has always been credited as the author.) As such, it is something of a singular curiosity now. Other early tie-ins, such as Brian Daley's trilogy of books about Han Solo's pre-movie adventures, and even L. Neil Smith's eccentric trio of Lando Calrissian tales, fit nicely into the "Expanded Universe" framework of the more recent Star Wars novels. Splinter, however, stands alone, uninformed by important character revelations that came in the second and third movies (Episodes V and VI, if we really must) and a bit off-kilter in tone from the well-established Star Wars formula.

Supposedly based on early screenplay drafts for either Star Wars itself or a possible low-budget sequel (depending on which source you consult), Splinter of the Mind's Eye begins with Luke Skywalker, Princess Leia, and the droids en route to a meeting with an underground cell they hope to recruit into the Rebel Alliance. A mechanical problem forces their ships down on a swamp world called Mimban (which bears more than a passing resemblance to Dagobah, lending credence to the idea that much of the novel was borrowed from Lucas' story notes). There, they discover a secret Imperial mining operation and meet Halla, a local eccentric who claims to be Force-sensitive. She convinces Luke to help her in her quest to find the Kaiburr Crystal, a legendary gemstone that is said to help Force-users like Luke focus and enhance their powers; Luke's party and Halla, along with two alien sidekicks, set off across the foggy wilderness in search of the temple where the crystal resides. They are pursued by the sadistic ruler of the mining colony, Captain-Supervisor Grammel, a whole bunch of his stormtroopers, and a certain Dark Lord of the Sith who would like to possess the Kaiburr Crystal for his own purposes.

I remember that Splinter confounded me when I first read it as a kid, for two very large reasons: Han Solo and Chewbacca are conspicuously absent (they are mentioned in passing -- and not even by name -- only at the very end of the book), and there are no space battles. Indeed, the only scene involving spaceships at all is the very first one; once Luke and Leia crash on Mimban, the rest of the action is entirely planetbound.

These days, however, I actually found these aspects of the tale rather refreshing. The Star Wars novels of recent years, while not without their charms, have become extremely formulaic: the fate of the entire galaxy is always at stake, there are always multiple planetary locations and multiple space battles (both dogfights between one-man fighters and titanic slugfests between capital ships), and, between all our old favorites from the movies and all the new characters that have come to inhabit the Expanded Universe, the cast of the average EU novel is freakin' huge, and (for me, anyway) difficult to keep track of. Splinter, by contrast, is a much simpler, much more focused story. I like that it concerns itself only with a small handful of people (and droids and creatures) in a single location with a single purpose in mind.

More problematic, in terms of the overall saga continuity at least, is the ways in which Splinter flat-out contradicts accepted Star Wars lore. The most obvious issue is that the Luke and Leia we see here are most assuredly not siblings. The sexual tension between them is startling and more than a little icky in light of the way the saga developed in the years following 1978. (However, it does support a pet theory of mine, which is that the sibling thing was not planned from the beginning, as the official history now claims, and only came along when Uncle George needed a convenient way to resolve the Luke-Han-Leia love triangle.) In addition, the droids aren't as fully involved in the action as we've come to expect -- they are hardly present in the story at all, actually -- and Darth Vader demonstrates some odd abilities with the Force that aren't supported in any of the six movies and, to my knowledge, haven't been seen in any other EU novel. The only way to reconcile these things with our fully evolved, 30-years-on conception of these characters is to keep in mind when the book was written: before Empire or Jedi, before the prequels, before anyone really knew anything at all about Jedi or the Empire or anything else in the galaxy far, far away.

Turning to more technical matters, I've got to say that Alan Dean Foster isn't one of our better literary stylists; he often sounds as if he's swallowed a thesaurus and is trying desperately to impress us with his knowledge of big words. Also, Splinter came relatively early in his career, so his writing is rather clunky in places. However, I was surprised at how certain specific images from this book have stayed with me all these years, even a couple of which I'd forgotten the origin. For example, I remembered "clean grains [of sand] pressing into Luke's nostrils" as he's drowning at the bottom of a pond, and blood drying to a black crust on a cave floor after a big battle. And I remembered vividly the scene in which Captain-Supervisor Grammel puts out some poor bastard's eye with a plastic recording rod, then offers to let him see the image of it, as well as the bit when Luke dials down his lightsaber blade into a thin stilleto and uses it to open a locked door. That's something I would've liked to see in one of the movies.

Despite its flaws and anachronisms, Splinter of the Mind's Eye remains a very enjoyable read after all these years. It doesn't jibe at all with the Expanded Universe, or even the later SW movies, but it is a very pleasant way to revisit a time when Star Wars was fresh and its backstory was still an exciting mystery. And I've got to be honest: I think I prefer Luke and Leia as "a princess and a farmboy" who might become lovers, rather than brother and sister separated at birth. Even when I was twelve, that sibling thing was lame...

One final note that may or may not be interesting to anyone: my tattered old first paperback edition of the novel has an ad on the back page that shows large black droplets, conveniently labelled "Oil," dangling from tree branches. The predictable caption: "It doesn't grow on trees." How sad is it that 30 years have passed and that plea for conservation remains as timely -- maybe even moreso -- as it was back in the days of Jimmy Carter and the big OPEC gas crunch?

Morning Dose of Awesomeness

Scalzi points the way this morning to what he calls "the coolest picture you'll see today", and I've got to agree: it's amazing. It's a shot that was taken back in 2003 by the Mars Global Surveyor space probe, in orbit around the Red Planet. Click here, then click the photo for maximum bigness. You'll see the half-phase Earth and moon at the top of the photo; scroll all the way to the bottom and you'll see Jupiter and three of its moons. That's the third and fifth planets of our system seen in the same frame, photographed from the fourth planet. And the photo has a high-enough resolution that both planets are easily identifiable, even by a non-astronomer type. With a little digital massaging, you can even tell which hemisphere of our world was turned toward the camera. Beautiful...

If you're interested in the technical details, go here. But whatever you do, have a look at the photo...

June 26, 2007

iPrecious

Man, the crap just keeps on coming today! Hope Cranky Robert is around, especially for this next item:

Swear on the iPrecious!

I myself seem to be immune to the allure of this particular device -- I can't help but think of how greasy and icky that nifty touch interface will get after you hold it up to your face to make a call on a really hot day -- but I know some people around my place of employment who are salivating like Pavlov's infamous pooch.

As usual, click the pic for a better view...

I Just Got My Wish...

Interesting... just out of curiosity, I ran Simple Tricks through that blog rating thingie again. I'm a PG now. Apparently using the word "whore" bumps you up a notch on the offense-o-meter:

The Stupid Spoiled Whore is Out

Sorry for the crass title, but that episode of South Park so perfectly encapsulated Paris Hilton's low character in that one vulgar phrase that I have a difficult time thinking of her in any other terms.

Anyhow, I've been trying to work up the dudgeon to comment on the media circus that accompanied her release from jail last night -- you'd have thought it was the biggest damn movie premiere in the history of moving pictures, the way EntertainmentExtraAccessTonight was so breathlessly talking about it -- but I just can't seem to summon the words I need to adequately convey my disgust with the media, with the SSW's stupid fanbase for idolizing this vacuous waste of protoplasm, and even with my own inability to leave this story alone while being fully aware that I'm giving the little twit exactly what she craves: attention. (oh, the hurtful prick of irony!) So I'll borrow someone else's observations instead, and let them stand in as reasonably close facsimiles of my own thoughts:

Phil Spector is on trial for murder but nobody notices. The newspapers have been filled with reports that Paris served more time than 80 percent of people accused of similar crimes. They fail to take into account that Paris was pulled over three times. That she was swerving. That she had a signed statement saying she knew she was not allowed to drive. That she failed to show up to mandatory classes. The judges have discretion in these cases for a reason. Paris had flagrantly flouted the law. Several days ago she called Barbara Walters at 2 in the morning, 11 at night West Coast time. Nobody seems to think that's strange. A call to Barbara Walters at 11 at night from a prison cell.

The jail holds 2,200 people. It is full to capacity. There are only eight medical beds. Paris has occupied one of them almost the entire time.

...we shudder and complain about the attention Paris Hilton gets but we talk about her just the same, sometimes in quiet and disparaging tones. We talk about her more than we talk about Iraq and often we talk about how we talk about Paris Hilton when we should be talking about the war in Iraq.

But we don't.

Food for thought, kids. That's all I'm sayin'...

Here They Come, Redux!

Remember that photo of the International Space Station looking like a TIE fighter? Somebody's been playing...

June 25, 2007

Well, Now I Know...

You Should Be a Film Writer
You don't just create compelling stories, you see them as clearly as a movie in your mind.
You have a knack for details and dialogue. You can really make a character come to life.
Chances are, you enjoy creating all types of stories. The joy is in the storytelling.
And nothing would please you more than millions of people seeing your story on the big screen!

Shadow Update

Several people have asked me in the past few days how Shadow, the Bennion Family Dog, is doing with his cancer treatments. It sounds kind of stiff to say it like this, but I want to thank you all for your concern and interest. It really means a lot to me and my folks. The short answer is, he's doing surprisingly well.

He's had two chemo treatments to date, with the third scheduled for this afternoon. (He's probably at the vet's clinic as I type this, actually.) Thus far, his side effects have been mild to the point of barely noticeable. My parents report that he's somewhat lethargic for a couple of hours after he receives his injections, but that could just as easily be due to the miserably hot weather we've been having lately (i.e., he lays around a lot in the middle of the day anyhow, so who knows if it's the drugs or just the heat?), and he's also had some, ahem, soft bowel movements, but nothing catastrophic (i.e., no accidents in the house).

The biggest, most noticeable side effect actually isn't coming from the chemo drugs at all, it's the steroid he's been prescribed to shrink the swelling in his lymph glands. The stuff makes him thirsty, so he drinks lots and lots of water; this, in turn, naturally makes him have to pee. Often. And in copious amounts. He pees for several minutes at a time, in fact. It's actually pretty funny to watch.

He begins in the standard male-dog position, one leg cocked up in the air and a fairly intense expression on his face. But gradually the cocked-up leg begins to waver, then lose a little altitude. Shadow's expression softens, then becomes bored. Finally, the leg comes down to the ground... and he just keeps on peeing. And then the expression changes again from bored to irritated. He begins to look like exactly what he is: an elderly man who's annoyed at the changes he's noticing in how his body functions. I'm a long ways from elderly, but there are days when I know all too well what he must be feeling.

Shadow's chemo regimen consists of four cancer-fighting drugs (I previously said there were only two; I was incorrect). He's had two already, and will get the third today. The vet says you never can tell which one may or may not provoke a reaction, so it's possible that serious side effects are still coming. However, drug number two, which he received a week ago and was a one-time blast, was the most powerful, and it hardly seemed to faze him, so perhaps that's a good sign.

Two very good signs are that the swollen lymph nodes on his neck and behind his legs have gone way down -- they're practically gone, at least to the touch -- and he's been more active in the last week or so than he's been in months previously. At night when it's cooler, anyway.

So, keep your fingers crossed everyone. The signs are all good so far. And once again, thanks for everyone's support. I honestly do appreciate it.

I Obviously Need to Swear More...

So, I decided to participate in the latest meme thing that's sweeping the InterWebs, and I got back this rather surprising result:

Online Dating

A G rating? That's the kiss of death at the box office! I was hoping for at least a PG. Geez, it's not like Simple Tricks and Nonsense is the Pete's Dragon of the blogosphere... or is it? I'm so ashamed...

Random Questions for a Monday Morning

Just some things that have occurred to me in the past couple of days:

  1. When you go shopping for pillows, they come in three categories, for those who sleep on the backs, those who sleep on their stomachs, and those who sleep on their sides. What are you supposed to buy if you tend to sleep somewhere in between two categories?

  2. Why is Pat Benatar's most enduring song (based on how often I hear it on the radio compared with her other hits) "Love is a Battlefield"? If we're talking kick-ass songs about feminine empowerment in the face of male ass-hattery, I much prefer "Treat Me Right." If we're talking just plain kick-ass songs, then "Shadows of the Night" is my vote. And if it's that mushy, mid-80s, proto-new-agey vibe, then I'd rather hear -- god help me -- "We Belong." But "Love is a Battlefield"? Really?

  3. Finally, why do Jedi dress like Tatooine moisture farmers? Or is it that Tatooine moisture farmers are a bunch of backwoods posers who dress like Jedi in hopes of seeming slightly more sophisticated? (The real-world answer, of course, is that Ben, Luke, and Owen all dress like the feudal Japanese characters in the Kurosawa movies that G. Lucas wanted to reference, and the look was retained in the prequels for the sake of continuity. But who's interested in talking about the real world?)

That is all. Discuss amongst yourselves and get back to me...

June 24, 2007

Living on the Edge of Mordor

Driving home from The Girlfriend's tonight, I could see a pair of wildfires burning on the mountain ahead, the one which separates the Salt Lake Valley from Utah Valley to the south. It's a sight I've seen just about every summer for as long as I can remember -- hot weather combined with a careless cigarette butt or a dry lightning strike is a simple equation -- but it never loses its eerie, unworldly quality. That particular mountainside hasn't been developed yet, you see, so there are no street or house lights up there; it's effectively invisible at night, except when there's a fire. Then there's a glowing orange smudge that seems to float in the sky, or sometimes it backlights the hulking shape of the mountain itself. Geek that I am, I can't help but think of Lord of the Rings whenever I see this effect. All the image needs is a psychic vision of a flaming eyeball and a creepy, growling voice telling me that it sees me...

Of course, I was listening to "Every Breath You Take" tonight, so maybe that's close enough to the Voice of Sauron to count. That always seemed like such a nice romantic tune back in the Awesome '80s, before we all noticed the unnerving stalkerish overtones that linger underneath the catchy bass line like the stink of burning sagebrush...

June 22, 2007

Back in Action

Courtesy of Michael May's Adventure Blog, a new image of a familiar face:

Harrison Ford on the set of Indy IV

I've been pretty dubious of the whole idea of doing a fourth Indy movie, but I've got to admit, this picture brought a smile to my lips and injected a little cheer into an otherwise crappy day. It's good to see you again, Dr. Jones...

June 21, 2007

Sobering Truths About Back to the Future

Well, I just seem to be puttering away here today, don't I, posting up my little bits of nothing? Here's some more, courtesy of Lileks:

[Back to the Future], which I still think is a perfect little thing, was made in 1985. Marty was sent back to 1955. If they made the movie today, he’d go back to 1977.

Think about that. 1977 would look like today, minus computers. Same clothes, same Pink Floyd tunes on the classic rock station, same smear of gimcrack commercial architecture interspersed with stalwarts from the 20s. Color TV, Star Wars, angry Iran. Marty could order a Pepsi Free in 1977, and they’d think it was a sugarless brand they hadn’t gotten yet.

How's that for a scary thought? I, and I daresay most of the people reading this blog, are now the age of Marty McFly's parents in Back to the Future, a movie that came out when we were about Marty's age.

This actually parallels an equally scary thought I had the other day: in Back to the Future II, Marty travels 30 years ahead to what is, to him, the fairly distant future. That distant future was the year 2015... which is only eight years away from us now!

On the positive side, maybe this means that self-adjusting sneakers, hoverboards, Mr. Fusion, and the Cafe 80s aren't very far away. That would be nice...

Here They Come!

Squad leaders, we've picked up a new group of signals... enemy fighters, headed your way.

The crew of the space shuttle Atlantis had better angle the deflector shields and charge up the main guns! Oh, wait... that's just the International Space Station, looking rather TIE fighter-ish with its newly symmetical shape following Atlantis's successful construction mission. Just another one of those photos that amuse me...

(For a comparison of how the ISS has changed during this mission, click here for a 2006 photo, then here for a current one.)

The Vatican's "Important Movies"

In light of all the talk today about the AFI's 100 Greatest Movies list, I thought this was an interesting counterpoint:

In 1995, to commemorate 100 years of film-making, the Vatican made a list of what it called "Some Important Films." The list was divided into three areas--Religion, Values and Art.

The list is below the fold...

Religion:

Andrei Rublev
Babette's Feast
Ben-Hur (The Chuck Heston version, I presume, as opposed to the old silent, although I've actually seen both...) *
The Flowers of St. Francis
Francesco
The Gospel According to St. Matthew
La Passion de Notre Seigneur Jesus-Christ
A Man for All Seasons
The Mission
Monsieur Vincent
Nazarin
Ordet
The Passion of Joan of Arc *
The Sacrifice
Therese

Values:
Au Revoir Les Enfants
The Bicycle Thief *
The Burmese Harp
Chariots of Fire
Decalogue
Dersu Uzala
Gandhi
Intolerance
It's a Wonderful Life *
On the Waterfront
Open City
Schindler's List *
The Seventh Seal *
Tree of Wooden Clogs
Wild Strawberries

Art:
Citizen Kane *
8 1/2
Fantasia *
Grand Illusion
La Strada *
The Lavender Hill Mob *
The Leopard
Little Women (Which version? I saw the most recent one with Winona Ryder...)
Metropolis *
Modern Times *
Napoleon
Nosferatu (Presumably the silent version...) *
Stagecoach
2001: A Space Odyssey *
The Wizard of Oz *

As usual when I'm discussing these sorts of lists, I couldn't resist bragging about my depth of cinematic experience, so I've marked the ones I've seen with an asterisk (*). Except in this case, I don't have a lot to brag about. As you can see, I haven't seen many of the Vatican's faves, especially those in the "Religion" category. The biggest reason why I've seen so few has little to do with subject matter, however; the problem is that so many are foreign movies. Foreign movies are a regrettable hole in my movie-going background... aside from the few I had to watch in my History of Film cycle at the U of U, I just haven't seen very many, and I rarely seek them out, either.

Chalk it up to typical American parochialism, I guess. Would it help if I mentioned that several of these are films I've long meant to see and just haven't gotten around to? Even a little?

What Can't the iPhone Do?

I'm not exactly what you'd call an "early adopter." I don't own an iPod or a TiVo, I've never seen the point of having a PDA when a good old notepad works just as well, I only upgrade my cellphone every four or five years, and I've wouldn't begin to know how to BitTorrent a movie. However, I'm thinking I need to get one of these new-fangled iPhone gadgets. It was the condiment-dispensing feature that sold me:

Via.

Speaking of Blade Runner...

Wowsers! Now <i>this</i> is a DVD set!

Cyberpunkreview.com has posted the specs on the upcoming limited edition DVD super-set release that I've been talking about for months, and they are impressive indeed:

Disc 1 - The Final Cut (2007):

* Ridley Scott’s definitive new version of his science-fiction masterpiece includes added & extended scenes, added lines and new and cleaner special effects.

Disc 2 - 3 Complete Film Versions:

* ‘82 U.S. Theatrical version
* ‘82 International Theatrical version
* ‘92 Director’s Cut

Disc 3 - “Dangerous Days: Making Blade Runner” Documentary

* Newly created documentary: Through interviews with the cast and crew, critics and colleagues, this feature-length documentary provides a mainstream-friendly yet meaningful in-depth look at Blade Runner’s literary genesis, its challenging production and controversial legacy. When all is said and done, this will be the definitive documentary on the film.

Disc 4 – Enhanced Content Bonus: (TBC)

* INCEPTION - Featurettes and galleries devoted to Philip K. Dick, the birth of Cyberpunk and adapting the novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep.
* PRE-PRODUCTION - Featurettes and galleries devoted to script development, conceptual design and abandoned sequences.
* PRODUCTION - Featurettes and galleries devoted to principal photography and locations.
* POST-PRODUCTION - Featurettes and galleries devoted to deleted scenes, music and visual effects.
* RELEASE - Featurettes and galleries devoted to marketing and reaction including Trailers, TV Spots and Promotional Featurettes
* LEGACY - Featurettes and galleries devoted to the film’s resurrection and impact.

Disc 5 - Work Print Version & Enhanced Content:

* Including the rarely seen Work Print version and potentially the 52 min. Channel Four (UK) documentary which was the first serious documentary created for the film.

Additionally, the set will come packaged in a limited “Blade Runner” briefcase holding the five-disc digipack with foil-enhanced and embossed slipcase. The goodies inside will include a lenticular motion image from the original feature, a collectible model spinner, an origami unicorn, a collection of photographs and a letter from Ridley Scott.

I could do without the fancy briefcase packaging and the miscellaneous tchotchkes that come with it -- all I'm really interested in is the actual DVDs -- but I'm assuming that there will be a disc-only release at some point, as there has been with other high-end collector's editions.

My biggest concern, of course, is how the earlier versions of the film on Disc 2 have been handled, i.e., are they going to be in anamorphic widescreen so they'll look right on my fancy HDTV? Or are they just perfunctory add-ons that will look no better than 15-year-old laserdisc copies, like some other significant science-fiction movie whose original cut has not been properly respected? (Guess which one!)

I haven't been able to confirm one way or the other; however, I haven't heard that they won't be in anamorphic, and the last DVD release of Ridley Scott's Alien -- which also featured multiple cuts of that movie -- included a very nice anamorphic transfer of the original theatrical cut, so it's logical to assume that Scott will give the same consideration to Blade Runner fans.

As I've said before, I really wish G. Lucas would take note of how this set is being done and come off his high horse about the unrevised version of Star Wars. But that's probably about as likely as unicorns and flying cars, isn't it?

June 20, 2007

Something That Bugs Me: Things That Started "It" All

So, I'm sitting here watching the AFI 100 Greatest Movies of All Time (10th Anniversary Edition) special, and I just saw a commercial for Blade Runner: The Final Cut, coming soon on DVD and (according to this commercial) to theaters this fall. Leaving aside my conviction that acknowledged classics shouldn't be revised or messed with (and also that Ridley Scott is horribly misguided in his efforts to convince us that Deckard is a replicant), it was pretty exciting to see this film being advertised again. However, something about the ad really grated on me: the obligatory slogan, "The One That Started It All."

I say "obligatory" because it seems these days that every single film that has inspired sequels or imitators uses it; for example, it popped up again recently when the original Shrek was aired on TV a few weeks back. I hate this slogan. It's hackneyed and virtually meaningless. What the hell is "it" anyway? "It" is never defined, and there are apparently lots of different "its" out there, since Shrek's "it" most likely is not Blade Runner's "it" (although it'd be interesting if it was -- imagine a dystopian future-noir fairy tale...). Really what "it" is, is lazy marketing. It's a simple, cliche'd fix for a copywriter who's staring down a deadline and doesn't have the slightest original thought in his head about the movie in question. As with all the other stuff that bugs me, this slogan will be forbidden when I become the Unquestioned Ruler of the Universe.

That is all. Back to the AFI list now...

Sniper Cat!

I swiped this image from Danger Room. Why? I dunno... I just thought it was funny. Consider it my contribution to that lolcat thing that's been sweeping the interwebs lately.

Take him out, now!

(If anyone would like to come up with a suitably bizarre and/or funny caption for this in order to make it a true lolcat, by all means, be my guest.)

June 19, 2007

Mmmmmm, Metal Bikini Chains...

The blog Indexed features curious little cartoons and musings sketched on index cards. Usually they illustrate the convergence of several apparently unrelated concepts that add up to some kind of common knowledge or meme. I have to admit that I find many of them utterly indecipherable -- or at least not terribly funny -- but today's entry (titled "Fantasy vs. Frustration") struck a chord:

Fantasy vs. Frustration

Bingham High Class of '87 Reunion -- Already?

Sometimes, it's really hard for me to wrap my head around the truth of just how old I'm getting to be. Maybe that's because I spend so much time writing about my younger days on this blog; keeping my memories stirred up all the time tricks me into feeling like the year 1987 isn't all that far away.

At least it doesn't seem very far away until I really start thinking about what was going on in 1987: Ronald Reagan was in the White House and Margaret Thatcher was living at Number 10 Downing Street; the Soviet Union still existed; the Berlin Wall divided east from west; Iran and Iraq were at war with each other; the names "Gary Hart," "Donna Rice," "Jim Bakker," and "Jessica Hahn" were all over the tabloids; The Simpsons were just short interstitial segments on The Tracy Ullman Show; the Fox Network had just started operation, and 21 Jump Street was its most popular show; and Richard Marx and Tiffany were two of the biggest musical acts in the land. Viewed in that light, 1987 suddenly seems pretty damn distant, doesn't it?

Here's one final salvo to really drive the point home: I've gotten word that my 20-year high school reunion is coming up this fall. It's going to be held at The Depot, a really nifty night club located in the old Union Pacific train station at The Gateway, on September 8th. There's a website with all the details here; it includes a feature where you can leave some info about what you've been up to for the past two decades (it's free, unlike that other reunion-type website you may have heard of).

I happen to know that a number of my fellow Bingham Miners read this blog, so if any of you are still in touch with any of our other classmates, spread the word, will you? And go let everybody know what you've been up to! (Besides reading my humble blog, of course...)

June 18, 2007

Watching the Skies

Last night, just before 11 PM, I walked out of my parents' back door and looked off to the northwest. It was a clear night, but living as close to a good-sized city as my parents and I do, I couldn't see many stars because of all the light pollution. Orion and the Big Dipper always stand out, and a handful of other constellations whose names I don't remember, but the sky over Salt Lake generally looks pretty empty, so I was dubious that I'd be able to see the International Space Station, as the TV weather guy had been breathlessly promising for several days. And really, I wasn't sure why I was bothering.

I've been struggling the last few months with a growing ambivalence toward the subject of manned space exploration. It's something I've been fascinated with and supported as long as I can remember, but just lately... well, I don't know that I'm losing interest in the subject, but maybe I'm losing my faith.

When I was a kid, I was absolutely convinced that some modern form of manifest destiny was inevitably going to pull us "out there," that the human race would just naturally migrate outward to the other planets in our system, to giant orbital space colonies like Gerard O'Neill imagined, and, ultimately, to other stars, whether aboard "sleeper" ships that carried passengers in some form of hibernation, or on multi-generational vessels that would deposit the descendents of the original crew on distant worlds, or even, if some genius somewhere figured out how to do it, via hyperdrive starships, just like in the movies. Moreover, I was certain it would happen soon, within the next couple of decades, certainly by the time I was middle-aged.

It was easy to believe that then, and not just because I still enjoyed the inate gullibility of a child. The memory of the Apollo missions was still fresh in our nation's collective consciousness, and the first few men to fly aboard the shiny space shuttles were accorded with a certain level of hero worship by the media. Much of the pop culture of the 1970s and '80s was set in a future where human beings were travelling among the stars

These days, however... well, let's just say I'm become jaundiced about the whole thing, and that troubles me deeply. It feels very much like I'm losing something that used to define me. Perhaps this is a superficial comparison, but it's a similar feeling to the disappointment I experienced when George Lucas started defending his revisions to the original Star Wars trilogy by dissing the version we all grew up on, in essence telling us we were wrong to have loved it all these years. I think I'm experiencing a paradigm shift.

I now understand things that I didn't when I was younger. I understand that Apollo, while a magnificent and historic achievement that should be remembered and celebrated, was really just a political stunt motivated by a sense of competition with another nation and by sentimentality for the dead president who suggested it.

I understand that living on another world, or even in Earth orbit, that simply reaching those locations, is a helluva lot harder than it always seemed to be to an imaginative adolescent.

I understand that the space shuttle, as thrilling as it still is to watch when it lifts off like a rocket and lands like a plane, was never quite the machine it was intended to be. Indeed, it was -- is -- a mass of compromises that was designed to do several things adequately, but does nothing really well.

And I understand that the International Space Station has no apparent purpose for existing. What is its mission? Is it intended for scientific research? If so, research into what areas? Is it going to become a support base for missions to the moon and beyond? Or is it really just a monument to unfocused ambition, a thing we have to finish building because we've come too far and spent too much on to abandon it now? Damned if I know...

Nevertheless, I found myself standing in my parents' back yard in the middle of the night, searching the skies for a glimpse of the thing. Just out of curiosity, I suppose.

I couldn't see the horizon from where I was standing. There was a clump of trees in my way, a couple of roofs beyond that. And there was a street light in my peripheral vision. I held up my hand to block the glare and fixed my eyes over the top of the trees. I waited... and I waited a little while longer. I saw nothing out of the ordinary. I thought I must've missed it, that it had passed already, or that the same amber haze of cityglow that screens out most of the stars was hiding the station as well.

I was about to go back inside, disappointed. And then I spotted it. A reddish spark rising above that clump of trees in the northwest, just like the weather guy said it would.

It was moving faster than I anticipated. I shouted through the screen door to my parents that I'd found it if they wanted to see. By the time they'd slid the screen aside and joined me, the spark had already risen to a spot directly above me, and it had gotten much, much brighter, presumably because it was high enough to catch the rays of the sun that had departed from my half of the world a couple hours earlier. The ISS looked, for all the world, like a lone LED indicator lamp shining out there in the black.

I had my father's binoculars in my hand, and I had a quick glance through them, hoping to see a silhouette, some regular lines and sharp angles, anything to indicate that I was looking at a manmade object. But the glasses weren't powerful enough. All I saw through them was a larger spark.

No... that wasn't all... I also saw stars. Faint shining stars that were invisible to my naked eye, washed out by the streetlights and cars and parking lots, but still up there, looking back at me and waiting, just where they always have been. Just where they will always be, at least in human terms.

I was so awestruck by the sight of long forgotten stars that I almost let the ISS get away from me. I finally lowered the binocs and watched the red spark of the station start to fall toward the eastern mountain range. Its brilliant glow was fading now as it plunged toward Earth's shadow. It got dimmer and dimmer and then... it just vanished, gone well before it reached the jagged tips of the mountains.

The whole encounter took maybe three or four minutes.

I stood for a time after the station had passed and thought about the fact that human beings had made that light in the sky, that there were human beings inside it, hurtling around the globe every 90 minutes while those faint stars I'd glimpsed through my dad's old Bushnells shone upon them. That's an amazing thing. And it's a thing that I hope we don't turn our backs on, at least not in principle.

I think I've lost my faith in NASA, and I honestly don't believe that the current initiative to return to the moon will pan out. But I still believe in the idea of human beings in space... and maybe that's enough.

Random Observations on This Saturday Past

On Saturday, The Girlfriend and I attended a family reunion/celebration in honor of her maternal grandmother's 90th birthday. The following items are just some things that occured to me as I sat in a public park on a sweltering hot day:

  • The temperature on Saturday was somewhere north of 100 degrees. As much as I love this valley, surrounded by mighty peaks and deep family ties and my very own dead sea just outside the city limits, days like this make me seriously consider where else in the world I might be happy living. Seattle, maybe, or Vancouver, or London, or Edinburgh, or Anchorage. Anyplace that's cool and green...

  • On the positive side, however, I adore the evenings that follow those sweltering days, when the sun has fallen behind the Oquirrh Mountains but the sky remains bright overhead and the breezes start to pick up. That's the perfect time to put the top down and drive, or at least just to stand in a doorway and let your eyes unfocus for a few minutes.

  • During the party, I naturally had to utilize the public restroom there in the park, and as I was, ahem, utilizing, I saw the cliche'd graffito on the wall in front of me: "FOR A GOOD TIME, CALL XXX-XXXX." I found myself wondering, "Has anyone in the history of Alexander Graham Bell's marvel ever actually called one of these numbers? And who writes these things on the walls, anyway?" For the record, I have never been tempted to write anything on a bathroom wall...

  • This, of course, reminded me of something I read years ago in a book about Herculaneum, the less famous of the two Roman Empire towns that were destroyed by the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius in 79 AD. Apparently, among the spectacular mosaics and decoration wall paintings that were preserved by the falling ash, there was also some latrine graffiti that remains perfectly readable after 2000 years. And it's pretty much the same drivel that we're still writing on restroom walls. Well, that somebody is still writing there. Only we have telephone numbers to include with them now...

  • And finally, Anne had the thought to take the small photo printer her parents gave her for Christmas so she could take pictures with her digital camera and print them out on the spot for everyone who wanted them. It was a great idea and most everyone present was impressed, especially Anne's grandma, who was quite frankly blown away by the idea of a camera that can take hundreds of pictures without film (she kept asking if the roll was getting full yet). But it occurred to me that my father was able to do pretty much the exact same thing in 1965 using his Polaroid.

    I guess what they say is true: the more things change...

That is all. You may now move freely about the cabin...

June 15, 2007

Congratulations to Keith and Danielle -- Again!

This is a little after-the-fact, but I just got the news this morning:

My old school chum Keith Jensen and his wife Danielle have welcomed their second child into the world. It's another daughter, Cailee Brynne Jensen (nicely Celtic name there, guys), born May 22. The statistics are as follows, for those who are into that sort of thing (Anne, I'm thinking of you): 7 lbs., 6 oz., 20 inches long.

Mother and daughter are both fine. Congrats to the whole family, and I hope life in Jersey isn't getting you too down...

The Federal War on the Undead!

Best headline of the week: FBI tries to fight zombie hordes

The article is actually about the Feds' efforts to stop cybercriminals who hijack home computers to use in their nefarious activities (such computers are called zombies by those in the tech biz), but damn, for a second there, I was having visions of Elliot Ness in a George Romero scenario, and wouldn't that be cool?

Canine Chemotherapy Trivia

A couple of random factoids about my dog's cancer treatment that I found amusing and/or interesting:

  • In order to administer the chemo drugs, the vet, of course, needs to shave the injection site, which is located on the leg. The course of treatment will run long enough that the vet will need to use several different injection sites to avoid discomfort and/or problems for the dog, so all four legs will end up with shaved spots. Apparently, however, the fur won't grow back at those spots. I don't know if that's a side effect of the drugs or something to do with dog physiology or what, but, assuming he survives the cancer, Shadow will have permanent "battle scars."

    I have asked my folks to try and convince the vet to line up the shaved bits. It will drive me crazy if my dog ends up with asymmetical bald patches.

  • The vet is obtaining the chemo drugs from the Huntsman Cancer Institute, one of the preeminent cancer research and treatment centers in the country, which is conveniently located at the University of Utah here in Salt Lake. Which means that the drugs used to treat dogs with cancer are the very same ones used on humans who have cancer; they just dial back the dosage to account for the differences in body size.

    I don't know why that surprises me, but it does...

June 14, 2007

So Far, So Good...

For anyone who cares, my dog Shadow had his first chemotherapy treatment this afternoon. According to my folks, he was a bit lethargic for a few hours afterwards, but otherwise has shown no sign of side effects from the drug. He's eaten normally and drunk lots of water and became quite active towards evening, just the way he always does on a hot day.

However, one thing to keep in mind is that his treatment consists of two separate drugs, and the one he received today was the milder of the two. He'll get the industrial-strength version on Saturday, so this weekend might be another story when it comes to side effects. But for now at least, my parents and I are all feeling much more optimistic about this process...

TV Title Sequences I Like: Magnum, PI

I mentioned Magnum, PI in the the previous entry and, as best I can recall, it aired on the same night as Simon & Simon (I think it was Thursday, Magnum first, then S&S... and yes, it frightens me that I remember that!), so why don't we have a look at the opening for Tom Selleck's best-known work?

I don't know about you, but that got my heart pounding. I think this opening, along with the one from Miami Vice, are probably the best title sequences of the '80s, brilliant pairings of exciting, memorable music with the perfect visuals.

Oddly, though, this was not Magnum's original opening. For roughly half of the first season, the show had completely different theme music, and a somewhat different montage of visuals beneath it. Have a look:

I'm really glad they changed it. This music is, let's be honest, really lame. It sounds like some kind of cheesy lounge-lizard thing, and doesn't remotely capture the tone of the series. Of course, the tone of the series was somewhat in flux for the first few episodes, ranging from somewhat noir-ish to almost farcical, so I guess it's not surprising it took a while to get the music right.

If nothing else, these two clips serve as a good example of what a difference something like music can make. The visuals in the original opening are essentially the same ones that were used in the more familiar one (although they were reordered when the new theme came along), but the music gives them an entirely different -- and less dynamic -- feel.

TV Title Sequences I Like: Simon & Simon

As I'm sure you can imagine with the news about my dog and all, I've been in kind of a funk the last few days. And where do I turn when I'm feeling down? Where else but to that wondrous opiate of the modern masses, television! Or, as Homer Simpson once called it, "Teacher, mother, secret lover." So, in that spirit, let's take a look at yet another TV title sequence that I've always thought was tres cool, or at the very least, entertaining:

Detective shows were all over the airwaves in the early '80s, a consequence, I believe, of the success of Magnum, PI. It seems like I used to watch all of them, too; I know this blog makes it seem as if the only entertainments I've ever liked involve starships and rayguns, but I've always been big on gumshoes, too. Go figure.

Most of the post-Magnum detective shows seemed to follow the general Magnum formula: a mixture of action and silly comedy centered around a hunky bachelor private eye with a flashy car who somehow manages to live (unrealistically) far beyond his means, given that he so frequently is dealing with deadbeats or charity cases. There was usually at least one goofy sidekick around for good-natured male bonding, and women were present only as damsels in distress, femme fatales, one-episode dates, or the Haunting Woman from the Past.

Simon & Simon added an element of sibling rivalry to this mix by making the titular characters brothers, and later introduced the boys' mother as a regular character. Next to Magnum, this show was probably my favorite of the various detective series, although oddly enough, I don't remember much about it beyond the basic premise. I do recall that I always identified more with facial-haired Rick than preppy, prissy AJ, although I preferred AJ's Camaro to Rick's big cowboy truck. I'm just not a truck kinda guy, I guess...

June 13, 2007

What We Do for Our Pets

The Shadow contemplates a dark and uncertain future.

We've had a lot of dogs around the Bennion Compound over the years. At one point during my childhood, there was a pack of five roaming our back yard. They've been German shepherds mostly, or German-shepherd mixes, as well as a couple of random mutts. All of them have possessed unique personalities, and my parents and I have loved them all while they were here and mourned them all when they died.

But none of them have generated the strong sense of attachment we collectively feel for the dog you see in that photo above. That's Shadow, the current canine member of the Bennion clan. He's a full-breed border collie, a breed that is reputed to be only slightly removed from wolves, genetically speaking, and among the very smartest of all dogs.

I can attest to the latter: only a few weeks after we got him, when he was still an adorably goofy-looking puppy tripping over his own feet, I watched him study the problem of how to retrieve a tennis ball from a high shelf and conclude that a nearby La-Z-Boy would make an excellent trampoline. He took a running leap at the chair and hit it square in the back so it rocked back and put him within range of the ball. He delicately took the ball in his front teeth, then the chair sprang upright again and flipped him back to the floor. He landed as clean as an Olympic gymnast and trotted off with his prize.

As the big-game hunter Muldoon says in Jurassic Park, you can see this one working things out.

Sometimes his intelligence is downright spooky, to be honest. He often seems to understand plain English sentences, spoken in a regular conversational tone. He knows which cars belong to which member of the family, so you can say, "let's go for a ride in my car," and he'll go to the correct one. (He knows which car belongs to The Girlfriend, too, even though she doesn't live on the Compound.) He hides balls all over the Compound, remembers where they are, and often refuses to play with just any old ball because he wants a specific one. He's obsessed with those damn balls, and will literally play catch until he drops from exhaustion. And he sulks when he doesn't get his way or when he's left home alone... neither of which happens very often.

We brought Shadow home on Christmas Eve some eleven years ago, when he was about six weeks old. Supposedly, he was a present for my mom, but, in a fine moment of cosmic irony, he bonded with my dad instead. Now, Dad has always liked our various dogs well enough, but he's never been terribly close with them, if that makes sense. Mom and I were the ones who mostly interacted with them, feeding them and playing with them and such. Dad was usually the disciplinarian who remained somewhat aloof. Until Shadow came along, that is.

Shadow is my Dad's constant companion. Dad rarely goes anywhere without his border collie co-pilot. When Dad buys himself a Whopper, he has to get a second one for Shadow. Dad has yelled at me for yelling at Shadow, and has lectured me more than once on how I need to learn to be more patient. (This from a man who's incapable of watching even half a second of a commercial before changing the channel.)

Mom and I have laughed many times at Dad's fierce and somewhat out-of-character loyalty to that dog. And that's why Dad is the one I've been feeling sorriest for since we got the news.

Last week, my parents took Shadow to the vet to investigate some mysterious swellings on his neck and behind his legs. We all had an unpleasant hunch of what those swellings meant. The hunch was confirmed on Monday when the biopsy results came back.

Shadow has lymphosarcoma, cancer of the lymphoid system. If left untreated, he has three to six months to live.

However, there's no way my parents -- my father especially -- are willing to let him go without a fight. As crazy as it probably sounds, they are now scraping together the funds to pay for chemotherapy. Yes, that's right: dogs can get cancer and be treated with chemo, just like people. Who knew? On the positive side, we've located a nearby veterinary clinic that specializes in canine cancers, and the doctor there has informed us that dogs generally tolerate chemo quite well, with few of the nasty side effects that plague humans. Of course, a lot of that depends on the individual dog, so there's no way to say for certain until we actually give him the drugs.

The treatments consist of an IV drip administered once a week for the next four or five weeks, then a week or two off (Mom couldn't remember the exact numbers), followed by another series using a slightly different cocktail of drugs. Rinse and repeat for the next nineteen weeks, after which, hopefully, Shadow's cancer will be in remission. The treatments may begin as soon as tomorrow, depending on what Mom and Dad are setting up while I type this at work. If they work and the cancer goes into remission, my parents will have bought Shadow another eighteen months to two years of life. We're assured those will be good years, too, with a high quality of life.

Are two more years worth the several thousand dollars that this is going to cost? I know some people, maybe even a lot of people, would say no, that he's just a dog, for god's sake. Just don't say that in front of my father. Not if you value your teeth.

It's going to be an interesting summer...

June 11, 2007

Ha-Ha

Any further comment would be redundant...

Ha-Ha!

More Wars

Oh, and if you can stand one more item on the 30th anniversary of Star Wars, I liked Javier's remarks:

at this point "star wars" is a living thing - a highly complex and still-developing universe that goes well beyond a series of films. it's also the guiding light for a great number of media professionals of my generation: while studying at usc film school, george lucas's alma mater, i used to say that there were two kinds of film school students in my age category, those who freely admitted that they were there because of george lucas's example, and damned liars.

...

if you're like me, and your feelings about uncle george are deeply mixed because of the quality of the prequels, or because of how many damned times you have had to buy the movies in multiple formats, or because of lucasfilm's extremely poor management of the original movies in their original forms, or the excessive merchandising, or because the "dark nest" trilogy of post NJO novels was kinda weak, or what have you...

...well, get over it and raise a glass [of] corellian noale - wherever you are.

some of the prequel trilogy haters have been heard to say "george lucas raped my childhood" but, i'll tell you what, george lucas gave me my childhood. my life changed the day i saw "star wars" and for that - for the moment when i saw what was possible on the screen and said "i want to do that" - i can only be eternally grateful.

happy star wars day!

Justice Stumbles, But Recovers

Hey, kids, hope you haven't missed me too badly during my brief absence from the blogosphere. I've just returned from three days of visiting friends in Sin City. Report to follow, but in the meantime, I offer this visual commentary on the news I missed while I was driving across the Jundland Wastes, er, Nevada:

Yeah, that's the ticket. I was fulminating up a good blog-rant last week about this spoiled little twit's release on account of an "unspecified medical condition" (Whiny Bitch Syndrome would be my guess), but I got distracted by real-life issues and didn't get to it. The short version is that I was utterly disgusted by the whole deal, that I have no doubt a poor or middle-class person guilty of the exact same crimes wouldn't have gotten out of the pokey even a microsecond early, that her "home confinement" -- how awful, trapped in a mansion 30 times the size of the average person's modest shack! -- is emblematic of this country's on-going class war that many people deny exists, and that she should quit her snivelling and just serve her sentence like any other (non-wealthy) citizen would be required to do. I have nothing but contempt for children of privelege who've had the world handed to them on a platter and find it all boring, who contribute nothing to society and arguably harm society with their antics, who are famous for no good reason that I can see, and who expect all us commoners to kiss their lily-white (and they are always white, aren't they?) asses because they were lucky enough to be born with a particular surname. So, needless to say, I was thrilled when public outcry smacked her and the idiot judge who let her out in the head. It's so nice to see the public actually showing some outrage about something, given how little seems to faze us anymore.

Incidentally, if you don't understand the idiom of the picture above, check out the definition of "LOLcat" followed by the pre-eminent distributor of same. I don't know why I find these silly things so amusing, considering that I barely understand most leetspeak, but I do... probably because something about cats' faces lend themselves so well to being made fun of. It's the perpetual air of offended dignity, I think.

In Paris' case, it's funny because of her utter lack of dignity...

June 7, 2007

Quote of the Day

From Lileks' only somewhat-snarky tribute to the recently passed 30th anniversary:

We grew up on "Star Wars." We could outgrow it if we wanted to. But what's the fun in that?

My sentiments exactly, James...

Henry Sr. Not Coming Back

Well, rats: Connery won't be reprising his role as Indy's dad in Indiana Jones IV after all. Sir Sean issued the disappointing news in a classy statement, at least:

"I get asked the question so often, I thought it best to make an announcement. I thought long and hard about it and if anything could have pulled me out of retirement it would have been an Indiana Jones film. I love working with Steven and George, and it goes without saying that it is an honor to have Harrison as my son. But in the end, retirement is just too damned much fun. I, do however, have one bit of advice for Junior: Demand that the critters be digital, the cliffs be low, and for goodness sake keep that whip by your side at all times in case you need to escape from the stunt coordinator! This is a remarkable cast, and I can only say, 'Break a leg, everyone.' I'll see you on May 22, 2008, at the theater!"

I'm not troubled by the idea of Henry not appearing in this new Indy movie -- his character arc was pretty thoroughly finished by the end of Last Crusade -- but it now looks definite that the bleeding-from-the-eyes-awful League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is going to be the final title on Connery's filmography, and that, my friends, is an unbelievable tragedy.

The article I linked above also mentions that Cate Blanchett, Ray Winstone, and John Hurt are in the movie -- this is seconded on the official Lucasfilm Indy site here -- and that rumors that Karen Allen, Kate Capshaw, or both might be on board for a cameo remain unconfirmed one way or the other. (Personally, I'm rooting for at least a glimpse of Allen's Marion, the most logical "Indy girl" for our hero to have had a son with... assuming that Shia LaBouef is actually playing Henry Jones III, that is.)

In other Indy IV news, I've heard that John Rhys-Davies, a.k.a. Indy's favorite Egyptian digger and loyal sidekick Sallah, won't be coming back either, but depending on what Indy IV is actually about, his character might not fit into this particular story or setting, so I'm okay with his absence...

June 6, 2007

Beware of Pterodactyls

Two of my favorite stories in my younger days were Jules Verne's Journey to the Center of the Earth and Edgar Rice Burroughs' At the Earth's Core. (Notice I said stories, because, as it happened, I first knew these tales through their movie incarnations, and only came to the original novels later on, with a detour through the Classic Comics versions in between.) Both works stem from the premise that our planet is hollow, or at least contains vast subterranean open spaces, and that there is life, usually some weird mishmash of prehistoric beasts and highly advanced civilizations, in this interior realm.

It's actually a pretty common idea within a certain subset of fantasy-adventure pulp fiction. But just recently I've learned that there are apparently people out there who think it's more than just a good idea for a story. Some people really think the Hollow Earth theory is possible... and one guy aims to prove it:

A U.S. scientist and a small band of believers are planning a journey to the Canadian Arctic for what they call "the greatest geological expedition in history."

...They're looking for a fog-shrouded hole in the Arctic Ocean that leads -- they say -- to the centre of the Earth, where an unknown civilization is lurking inside the hollow core of the planet.

Um, okay. Bon voyage, guys. I think you're in for a long and disappointing summer.

Just to make this silliness even more delicious, it turns the expedition has a local connection: it was originally planned by a Utah-based adventure guide named Steve Curry. From the article I linked above:

Mr. Currey made a living organizing rafting trips to the world's wildest rivers. He knew how to hype exotic destinations and recruit would-be explorers on trips of a lifetime.

It's not clear whether Mr. Currey was a true hollow-Earth believer, or if he could simply see a good business opportunity. Whatever his beliefs, Mr. Currey somehow pinpointed the Arctic portal at 84.4 degrees north and 41 degrees east, roughly 400 kilometres northwest of Ellesmere Island.

Curry died of cancer a year ago, and the trip's current organizer stepped in to take his place (and the money of the various tourists who are going along with him). But still... remember what I said a while back? If it's weird, it's gotta be Utah.

Suspects of Interest

So, a question occurred to me this morning as I was watching the news: when did the media stop calling people who are suspected of a crime "suspects" and start calling them "persons of interest"? Is it some kind of political correctness thing? Or maybe it's the result of some nervous nelly in the legal department who's afraid they might get sued if somebody feels insulted by being called a suspect? But isn't that what a person of interest is? Why else would they be "of interest" if they weren't suspected of being involved?

I know I obsess too much about this sort of thing, but it seems to me that our language has undergone a major evolution over the past 20 years, and I don't think it's for the better in a lot of cases. Perfectly good words have been replaced by euphemism and spin, and as a result, English is less precise and less colorful, governed more by a perceived need for caution than to accurately describe things. Yeah, we're trying to avoid hurting people's feelings, which is laudable, but maybe our energies would be better spent in strengthening our resistance to being hurt, if that makes sense. To put it another way, I wish people would stop being so damn touchy about everything.

I'm reminded of an old Star Trek episode, actually. The Enterprise has encountered what appears to be Abraham Lincoln. Captain Kirk is willing to accept him as such, anyhow, and offers him a tour of the ship with full honors. During the tour, this 19th Century man spies Lt. Uhura and says, "What a lovely Negress." She gives him an odd look, and he stumbles all over himself to apologize for what he believes has been an anachronistic insult. To which she says something along the lines of, "in our century, we no longer fear words."

How would it be?

June 5, 2007

Something That Bugs Me: The Word "Tot"

In another example of what's likely to become an ongoing feature here at Simple Tricks, allow me to gripe about yet another trivial thing that's been annoying me for some time and has finally built to critical mass: my local newspaper's use of the term "tot" to describe young children.

It's a perfectly valid use of the word, of course -- it's in the dictionary and everything -- but I don't like it. There's the unfortunate association with deep-fried potato products, for one thing, but the bigger problem is that it just sounds dumb, at least to my ear. It's cutesy and cloying and somehow, in a way I can't quite put my finger on, quite smug-sounding. I hate it, and would be perfectly happy to never hear it used in relation to a human child again. So naturally the writers and editors at the Tribune seem to have some kind of sick fascination for it. A quick online search of the paper's web archive shows that it's been used at least four times in the past month, mostly recently this morning, in a headline that I found unbearably obnoxious ("Tot calls dad, saves mom's life"). And that's not even counting the articles about the State-of-Utah-sponsored "Spot the Tot" campaign to reduce driveway accidents. ("Spot the Tot"... good lord, that name is so Utah, all drippy and cutesy. We do love our cutesy here in this state...)

I know it's not rational, my hatred for this little word -- actually, now that I think about it, the paper probably uses it because it is a little word, and thus takes up less space -- but seeing it in a headline or paragraph just stops me dead in my tracks, like a pickup truck hitting a concrete abutment at about 75 mph. When I become Ruler of the Universe, it will be abolished in all instances. Even in reference to those deep-fried potato products, which shall henceforth be known as "yummy carbo-laden grease pods."

That is all.

TV Title Sequences I Like: Jonny Quest

I don't know if anyone else is enjoying this TV Title Sequence thing I've been doing, but I am sure am having fun hunting down this stuff, some of which I haven't seen or thought about in years. Today's selection is from one of my Saturday-morning faves when I was a kid, a 1960s-vintage cartoon that continued running (I believe) well into the 1980s: Jonny Quest. If you don't recall the show, Jonny Quest was just about the perfect series ever created for ten-year-old boys (and a whole lot of girls!). It followed the adventures of the titular character, who is, not surprisingly, about ten or twelve years old, as he travels the world with his father, globally renowned scientist and inventor, Dr. Benton Quest. Along for the ride are Jonny's friend Hadji (who can be read through a modern lens as an unfortunate stereotype, but in simpler, less-uptight times would've been just a damn cool kid to have as a buddy, what with his snake-charming powers and such), the obligatory yappy-dog Bandit for comic relief (which, admittedly, was never terribly funny, even when I was ten), and Dr. Quest's assistant, driver, bodyguard, sidekick, and regular right-hand man, Race Bannon. (Modern-day po-mo ironists take note of the fact that there are no women in the series and speculate about the true nature of Race and Benton's relationship, if you get my meaning. I suppose it's possible they were lovers; I prefer to see them as brothers-in-arms who, in the words of Indiana Jones' sidekick Short Round, have "no time for love." The show is, after all, a ten-year-old boy's vision of the world, as yet uncorrupted by such grown-up things as sexual chemistry.)

The title sequence for the show plays as a montage of greatest hits from previous episodes:

Yeah, that's great stuff with the jazzy, brassy, jangly-guitary, mid-60s-style music and the whole Kennedy-era sense of derring-do and "science will conquer all" attitude. As you can see from the clip, Jonny Quest covered a lot of territory: fantasy (dinosaurs), horror (the mummy episode), high adventure (the jungle stuff), science fiction (the eyeball/spider robot -- which always gave me a major case of The Willies -- and the assorted ray-guns, lasers, and blasters), spy thriller, and just plain old two-fisted, rifle-shooting, manly-man action. I know there have been a couple of attempts to revive and update the show -- one particularly oddball version in the mid-90s featured Jonny entering a CG virtual reality in every episode, as I recall -- but none of them came close to the innocent, pulp-fiction fun of the original. This is one of the very few kiddie cartoons that I'd like to have on DVD...

June 4, 2007

Bummer

Not quite the results one would hope for...

37%Mingle2 - Free Online Dating

Geez, if it's not gas-thieving road-freaks in SUVs, it's zombies. Some days, you just can't win...

The Precious Juice...

Their world crumbled; the cities exploded. A whirlwind of looting; a firestorm of fear. Men began to feed on men. On the roads, it was a white-line nightmare. Only those mobile enough to scavenge, brutal enough to pillage would survive. The gangs took over the highways, ready to wage war for a tank of juice...

--Voiceover prologue, The Road Warrior

Customer Forced at Gunpoint to Pump Gas into Suspect's Vehicle

--Headline from this morning's Salt Lake Tribune

You know how I'm always complaining that things aren't turning out like the movies I liked when I was a kid? Maybe I ought to be more specific about which movies I'm talking about...

Melvin's Latest Setbacks

There were a couple of developments last week in the ongoing saga of Melvin Dummar, the Utah native who claims to have done a good deed for gazillionaire Howard Hughes back in the '60s and has spent the last four decades getting hosed because of it. Neither event was especially good news for poor old Mel.

No doubt the most significant was a decision by U.S. District Judge Bruce Jenkins to deny Dummar's motion to take testimony from key witnesses he needs to hear from in order to push forward with his lawsuit. (Recall if you will that Dummar is trying to sue for the cut of Hughes' fortune he was promised by the infamous "Mormon Will," which a Nevada court decreed was a fraud way back in the '70s.)

Jenkins is the same judge who dismissed Dummar's suit back in January. As I understand his reasoning (and I'm not entirely sure I do), he thinks Melvin can't sue for the money and that he needs to instead work on convincing the Nevada court to reverse its ruling that the Mormon Will was fake; Melvin's attorney says that's not possible or necessary, because the Hughes estate has been disbursed and no longer exists. Instead, the current lawsuit seeks to obtain money from Hughes' cousin William Rice Lummis and former Hughes employee Frank William Gay, who are accused in the suit of defrauding the Nevada court in 1978 and screwing Melvin Dummar out of his fortune.

Dummar and his attorney are concerned that the witnesses they need to speak with are all getting old and may not be around to depose all that much longer. And it's a valid argument, considering that Frank Gay himself died only a few days ago. (That would be the other bit of bad news for Melvin I mentioned in the intro. It's hard to sue a corpse, after all.)

As I've mentioned before, I'm inclined to believe Dummar's story, and that certain powerful individuals (as well as his own naivete) conspired to wreck his credibility in order to keep the Hughes fortune under their control. I suspect, however, that I'm in a minority, that probably a whole lot of the general population, at least the percentage of it that knows who he is, thinks Melvin is a kook. Judge Jenkins certainly appears to. And because of that, I also suspect this lawsuit is a quixotic exercise that will ultimately end in disappointment and frustration for him. People like Jenkins will just keep throwing roadblocks in his way until time and attrition make sure there's no point in the legal system revisiting the case, because no one will be left who cares.

Sad... just once, I'd like to see the real world imitate Hollywood a little bit and let the amiable loser actually win the fight, instead of remaining a schmuck his whole life. It's not over yet, but I don't have high hopes for Melvin. And at this point, he probably doesn't either...

Synchronicity

Hm. This is curious... as John Scalzi reminds us, Saturday was the 40th anniversary of the U.S. release of The Beatles' album Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.

This was also the day when I decided to renounce Beatledom.

You just know there's got to be some kind of grand karmic consequences for something like that. It's like spitting in a church or something...

June 3, 2007

Wherein I Commit Musical Blasphemy

I realized something on Saturday afternoon as I was waxing my car and listening to the radio: "I Am the Walrus" is quite possibly the most aggravating song ever recorded. Yes, even more so than Britney Spears' "Toxic." The nonsensical, deliberately inscrutable lyrics, delivered by John Lennon in a voice that is simultaneously high-pitched, yet whiskey-raspy (two qualities which, combined, suggest to me the way Mickey Mouse might sound if he'd just smoked several bowls of particularly harsh ganja), and set to a plodding, mechanical beat... well, let's just say that the overall effect of the song is to set my teeth on a razor-thin edge.

In fact, when I'm really honest with myself, I have to admit that I really don't like The Beatles that much at all. Oh, I can't deny that they were historically significant, or that they influenced countless bands that followed, or that they did a handful of songs that only a completely joyless churl could criticize -- "Yesterday," "Norweigian Wood," and "Here Comes the Sun" are genuinely wonderful -- but, generally speaking, they just don't do much for me. I can't recall the last time I landed on one of their songs on the radio and happily stayed there without surfing on in search of something I preferred.

And as long as I'm revealing the depths of my philistinism, what the heck is the big deal about U2? Yeah, "Where the Streets Have No Name" is a great song, but why do so many people seem to think listening to this band is akin to communing with Buddha himself? I just don't get it...